ISSUE-1![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Inferencing |
CLOSED |
What inferencing can or must be used? |
2014-11-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-2![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Audience skills |
CLOSED |
What skills are expected/required from our audience? |
2014-11-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-3![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Shape association |
CLOSED |
How is a shape associated with a graph? |
2014-11-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-4![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Test |
CLOSED |
Test - please ignore |
2014-11-26 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-5![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Resource Shape Association |
CLOSED |
How is a resource associated with shapes? |
2014-12-04 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-6![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ShExC example |
CLOSED |
Story S2 - upgrade ShExC part |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-7![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S4 no story |
CLOSED |
Story S4 is missing a story |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-8![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S6 Clarification |
CLOSED |
S6 doesn't clearly state what feature is required |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-9![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S7 no story |
CLOSED |
S7 does not appear to have a story |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-10![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S8 no story |
CLOSED |
S8 does not have a story |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-11![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S9 impossible |
CLOSED |
S9 is about existing but unspecified values |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-12![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S10 story upgrade |
CLOSED |
S10 needs a better story |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-13![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S12 no constraints |
CLOSED |
it is not apparent where S12 involves constraints |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-14![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S14 constraints? |
CLOSED |
S14 might be about change not constraints |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-15![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S17 constraint? |
CLOSED |
S17 is about access not constraints |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-16![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S18 constraints? |
CLOSED |
S18 does not appear to be about constraints |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-17![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S19 and S20 ontologies |
CLOSED |
S19 and S20 need information to distinguish from ontology recognition |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-18![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S35 examples |
CLOSED |
S35 needs to state what constraints are required |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-19![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S35 not RDF |
CLOSED |
S35 appeals to something that is not RDF |
2014-12-19 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-20![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) S2 ShExC calling |
CLOSED |
ShExC example in S2 doesn't indicate how to set it up |
2014-12-29 |
User Stories |
0 |
ISSUE-21![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Shape Expressions? |
CLOSED |
What is shape expressions? |
2015-02-24 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-22![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) recursion |
CLOSED |
Treatment of recursive shape definitions |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-23![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ShapeClass |
CLOSED |
Shapes as classes |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-24![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) specialisation |
CLOSED |
Can shapes specialise other shapes? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-25![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) core/lite |
CLOSED |
What's in Core/Lite? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-26![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) invoke-highlevel |
CLOSED |
Can extensions invoke the high-level language? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-27![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) extensions-in-highlevel |
CLOSED |
Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-28![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) macros |
CLOSED |
Is the macro facility part of the high-level language or of the extension mechanism? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-29![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) formalism |
CLOSED |
Formalism for definition of high-level language |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-30![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) shape-and-data-graphs |
CLOSED |
Are shapes and data in the same graph? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-31![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) unitary semantics |
CLOSED |
Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-32![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SHACL+- |
CLOSED |
SHACL = high-level + extensions ? |
2015-03-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-33![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) shape selection |
CLOSED |
Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? |
2015-04-01 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-34![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) OrConstraint |
CLOSED |
2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint |
2015-04-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-35![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Language-tags Req |
CLOSED |
Language-tags Requirement |
2015-04-02 |
Requirements |
0 |
ISSUE-36![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Value type facet |
CLOSED |
Naming of value type facet |
2015-04-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-37![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Node kind facet |
CLOSED |
Naming of node kind facet |
2015-04-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-38![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Cardinality facet |
CLOSED |
Naming of cardinality facets |
2015-04-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-39![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Value shape facet |
CLOSED |
Naming of value shape facet |
2015-04-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-40![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property Cardinality |
CLOSED |
sh:min/max constrains properties, not values |
2015-04-05 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-41![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) property paths (sh:path?) |
CLOSED |
Using property paths to refer to values/types? |
2015-04-07 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-42![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:notEqual |
CLOSED |
Adding sh:notEqual to potential datatype properties? |
2015-04-07 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-43![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SHACL-Part-1-FPWD |
CLOSED |
Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 |
2015-04-09 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-44![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Graph dependencies |
CLOSED |
How to express dependencies between graphs |
2015-04-15 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-45![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SPARQL-extension |
CLOSED |
Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language |
2015-04-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-46![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) RDF lists |
CLOSED |
Support for RDF Collections? |
2015-04-22 |
Requirements |
0 |
ISSUE-47![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sparqling-shape-graph |
CLOSED |
Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? |
2015-04-23 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-48![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) scope-of-shape |
CLOSED |
How do we limit the scope for a shape? |
2015-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-49![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) scoped/unscoped shapes |
CLOSED |
Distinction between scoped and unscoped shapes |
2015-05-13 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-50![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) presentation requirements |
CLOSED |
Presentations to the working group |
2015-05-21 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-51![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Results Vocabulary |
CLOSED |
What types of validation results should be returned |
2015-05-22 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-52![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) abstract syntax |
CLOSED |
Define an Abstract Syntax for SHACL |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-53![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) multi-occurence |
CLOSED |
Multi-occurrence of the same predicate |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-54![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) labra |
CLOSED |
OneOf vs. SomeOf |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-55![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) labra |
CLOSED |
Triple constraints (drop me) |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-56![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) labra |
CLOSED |
Inverse triple constraints (drop me) |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-57![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) group cardinality |
CLOSED |
Cardinalities on expressions or groups of triple constraints |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-58![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Closed shapes |
CLOSED |
Signalling closed shapes/Defining closed shapes |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-59![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) default cardinalities |
CLOSED |
What are the default values for cardinalities? |
2015-05-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-60![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Other Extension Languages |
CLOSED |
Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? |
2015-05-30 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-61![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Direction of sh:nodeShape |
CLOSED |
Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope |
2015-05-30 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-62![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) General selection or filtering |
CLOSED |
Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes |
2015-05-30 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-63![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:hasShape |
CLOSED |
Nested shapes: sh:hasShape function versus recursive SPARQL code generation |
2015-06-01 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-64![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) XSD Datatype facets |
CLOSED |
Should the Core vocabulary support datatype facets such as sh:minInclusive and sh:maxLength? |
2015-06-01 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-65![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) nomenclature consistency |
CLOSED |
Consistency and cohesiveness of nomenclature (e.g., shapes, scopes, and constraints) |
2015-06-01 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-66![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) non-convergence |
CLOSED |
SHACL spec ill-founded due to non-convergence on data loops |
2015-06-10 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-67![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
Http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/66 |
2015-06-11 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-68![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) pre-binding |
CLOSED |
pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec |
2015-06-12 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-69![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdf:langString |
CLOSED |
status of rdf:langString values with xsd:string datatype |
2015-06-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-70![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) blank node default type |
CLOSED |
special treatment of blank node types |
2015-06-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-71![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Protocol |
CLOSED |
SHACL Endpoint Protocol |
2015-06-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-72![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) QCRs |
CLOSED |
Qualified Cardinality Restrictions |
2015-06-25 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-73![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:hasShape error handling |
CLOSED |
how do recursion errors from sh:hasShape interact with SPARQL |
2015-07-10 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-74![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SPARQL endpoint support |
CLOSED |
Should SHACL support validating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints |
2015-07-12 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-75![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) error vs violation |
CLOSED |
How to distinguish constraint violations from errors |
2015-07-13 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-76![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) commutability |
CLOSED |
Specifying execution order and commutativity of AND and OR |
2015-07-13 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-77![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:pattern flags |
CLOSED |
Shall sh:pattern also support sh:flags? |
2015-07-24 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-78![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:abstract |
CLOSED |
Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract |
2015-08-04 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-79![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Validation functions |
CLOSED |
Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration |
2015-08-13 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-80![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Scheme URIs |
CLOSED |
Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing |
2015-08-13 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-81![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property pair constraints |
CLOSED |
Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? |
2015-08-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-82![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Unique language |
CLOSED |
Shall SHACL Core include support for unique language constraints? |
2015-08-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-83![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes |
CLOSED |
How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? |
2015-08-21 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-84![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Allowed IRIs |
CLOSED |
Constraint to limit IRIs of focus nodes to a given enumeration (similar to owl:oneOf) |
2015-09-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-85![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) only one xor |
CLOSED |
what is the definition of XOR? |
2015-09-09 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-86![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ontology association |
CLOSED |
Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies |
2015-09-10 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-87![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Turtle file |
CLOSED |
Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? |
2015-09-11 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-88![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) qualifiedValue |
CLOSED |
Should we add sh:qualifiedValue ? |
2015-09-11 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-89![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) recursion without properties |
CLOSED |
How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? |
2015-09-15 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-90![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Literal focus nodes |
CLOSED |
Can the focus node be a literal? |
2015-09-21 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-91![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) default cardinality |
CLOSED |
Default Cardinality in property constraints |
2015-09-24 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-92![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) additive repeated properties |
CLOSED |
Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? |
2015-09-24 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-93![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) engine / language |
CLOSED |
SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements |
2015-09-24 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-94![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) separate syntax and semantics |
CLOSED |
Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics |
2015-09-24 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-95![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Template Simplifications |
CLOSED |
Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism |
2015-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-96![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Violation IDs |
CLOSED |
Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation |
2015-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-97![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:derivedValues |
CLOSED |
Shall SHACL include a mechanism to define constraints using derived values |
2015-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-98![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Node constraints |
CLOSED |
Can property constraints also apply to focus nodes? |
2015-10-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-99![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) special cases |
CLOSED |
special treatment of rdfs:Resource and rdf:List in sh:valueClass (and possibly elsewhere) |
2015-10-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-100![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:index |
CLOSED |
Specifying the order of property constraints (e.g. with sh:index) |
2015-10-07 |
SHACL - UI |
0 |
ISSUE-101![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) templates as classes |
CLOSED |
use of rdfs:subClassOf for template inheritance |
2015-10-08 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-102![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Specifying defaults |
CLOSED |
Missing a way to explicitly code unbound cardinality and open shapes |
2015-10-14 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-103![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Syntax simplifications |
CLOSED |
Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? |
2015-10-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-104![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Union ranges |
CLOSED |
Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? |
2015-10-23 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-105![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) defined prefixes |
CLOSED |
SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined |
2015-10-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-106![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) annotation properties |
CLOSED |
Annotation properties are not defined well |
2015-10-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-107![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) annotations v. arguments |
CLOSED |
annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name |
2015-10-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-108![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) operations |
CLOSED |
Should operations be specified? |
2015-10-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-109![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) function calling |
CLOSED |
SHACL requires that SPARQL implementations be able to call functions defined on the fly |
2015-11-04 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-110![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) single-property constraints |
CLOSED |
relationship between sh:constraint and sh:property and sh:inverseProperty |
2015-11-04 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-111![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) charter issues |
CLOSED |
How should the working group address the issues called out in the WG charter? |
2015-11-05 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-112![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) misuse of some RDFS properties |
CLOSED |
SHACL uses rdfs:label and rdfs:comment in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning |
2015-11-05 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-113![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SHACL and user interfaces |
CLOSED |
Let a user interface group design the connection between SHACL and UI tools |
2015-11-12 |
SHACL - UI |
0 |
ISSUE-114![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property Groups |
CLOSED |
Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) |
2015-11-12 |
SHACL - UI |
0 |
ISSUE-115![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ClosedShape |
CLOSED |
Closeness is an aspect of a Shape, but the current syntax treats it like all other constraints. |
2015-12-16 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-116![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
108 |
2015-12-17 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-117![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) non-classes as classes |
CLOSED |
sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class |
2016-01-11 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-118![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) syntax errors |
CLOSED |
syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results |
2016-01-11 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-119![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdf:Lists |
CLOSED |
Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists |
2016-01-27 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-120![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) shape-class-instance-defs |
CLOSED |
The spec must be more precise and consistent about when a resource is a shape, a class, and an instance of a class |
2016-01-28 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-121![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) # in graph name |
CLOSED |
Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character |
2016-02-04 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-122![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) no-shapes-file |
CLOSED |
Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? |
2016-02-10 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-123![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) DirectType syntax |
CLOSED |
Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? |
2016-02-28 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-124![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:group |
CLOSED |
sh:group is only mentioned in examples |
2016-03-06 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-125![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:NodeConstraint missing |
CLOSED |
sh:NodeConstraint is mentioned but never defined |
2016-03-06 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-126![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:TemplateConstraint undefined |
CLOSED |
sh:TemplateConstraint is used in examples but not defined |
2016-03-06 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-127![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:TemplateScope undefined |
CLOSED |
sh:TemplateScope is mentioned but not defined |
2016-03-06 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-128![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdfs:range |
CLOSED |
sh:defaultValueType is rdfs:range |
2016-03-06 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-129![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) existential constraints |
CLOSED |
Existential constraints should be consistent |
2016-03-07 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-130![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdf dataset assumption |
CLOSED |
SHACL should not assume that the data graph is in an RDF dataset |
2016-03-07 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-131![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:hasShape ill defined |
CLOSED |
The definition of sh:hasShape has errors and holes |
2016-03-07 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-132![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:predicate in constraints |
CLOSED |
sh:predicate is used in many constraints but not always available |
2016-03-07 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-133![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) syntax |
CLOSED |
syntax simplification and regularization |
2016-03-08 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-134![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) knowing inverse |
CLOSED |
does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints |
2016-03-10 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-135![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) and/or syntactic sugar |
CLOSED |
Should sh:and/sh:or/sh:not/sh:valueShape support constraints too? |
2016-03-10 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-136![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property pair names |
CLOSED |
Can we clarify the names of property pair constraint types? |
2016-03-13 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-137![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) language tag |
CLOSED |
Missing constraint for language tag |
2016-03-14 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-138![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property constraints as lists |
CLOSED |
Should property constraints use rdf:Lists? |
2016-03-18 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-139![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Universal applicability |
CLOSED |
Can all constraint properties be applied in all scenarios? |
2016-03-18 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-140![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Individual validation |
CLOSED |
SHACL needs to support validation of individual nodes |
2016-03-21 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-141![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Mixed ranges |
CLOSED |
How to represent mixed datatype-or-class ranges |
2016-03-22 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-142![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) loose terminology |
CLOSED |
SHACL spec is too loose with its uses of terminology |
2016-03-30 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-143![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) pre-binding in core |
CLOSED |
more pre-binding is needed in Section 3 |
2016-04-08 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-144![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) substitution |
CLOSED |
substitution is sometimes used instead of pre-binding |
2016-04-08 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-145![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) minExclusive code incorrect |
CLOSED |
the SPARQL code for sh:minExclusive is incorrect |
2016-04-08 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-146![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:qualifiedMinCount |
CLOSED |
treatment of unbound results from sh:hasShape in sh:qualifiedMinCount (and elsewhere) |
2016-04-08 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-147![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) vocabulary typos |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] misspelled vocabulary in specification document |
2016-04-10 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-148![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) scope syntax |
CLOSED |
non-uniform syntax in scopes |
2016-04-15 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-149![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ? vs $ in nodeKind |
CLOSED |
the SPARQL codefor nodeKind uses both ?value and $value |
2016-04-18 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-150![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) nested severities |
CLOSED |
Treatment of nested severities |
2016-04-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-151![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) illegal shapes |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] shape for sh:and is illegal |
2016-04-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-152![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:labelTemplate not defined |
CLOSED |
sh:labelTemplate should be defined for all its uses |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-153![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:sourceConstraintComponent modality |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] sh:sourceConstraintComponent is not required but some wording indicates that it is |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-154![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) value set not defined |
CLOSED |
the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-155![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) property pair constraints |
CLOSED |
problems in the description of property pair constraints |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-156![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) property pair constraints |
CLOSED |
problems in the description of property pair constraints |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-157![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) constraint component support |
CLOSED |
the support for constraint components is incorrectly stated |
2016-04-28 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-158![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) ill-typed literals and sh:datatype |
CLOSED |
ill-typed literals do not always trigger a validation result |
2016-04-29 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-159![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Eliminate "scope class" from 2.1.3.n |
2016-05-01 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-160![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Generalize sh:valueShape |
CLOSED |
Shall we generalize sh:valueShape to sh:shape |
2016-05-11 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-161![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) terminology |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] terminology fixups |
2016-05-14 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-162![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) section 1.2 editorial |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] Section 1.2 |
2016-05-14 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-163![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) "constraining" |
CLOSED |
should "constraining" and other forms of "constraint" be used less in the specification |
2016-05-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-164![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) mutable graphs |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] Section 1.4 (and maybe other places) looks as if graphs are mutable |
2016-05-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-165![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) shapes and scopes introduction |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] The introduction of shapes and scopes has confused a reader |
2016-05-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-166![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) two documents |
CLOSED |
separate out advanced part of specification |
2016-05-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-167![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) implicit class scope |
CLOSED |
[EDITORIAL] implicit class scope gives impression of inferencing |
2016-05-19 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-168![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) instance count |
CLOSED |
How to constrain number of instances of a class in a graph |
2016-06-13 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-169![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:scopeProperty naming |
CLOSED |
Should we rename sh:scopeProperty/InverseProperty |
2016-06-18 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-170![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) exists blank nodes |
CLOSED |
SPARQL specifies a different reading for exists and blank nodes than needed for SHACL |
2016-06-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-171![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) negated sh:classIn |
CLOSED |
sh:classIn SPARQL definition incorrect |
2016-06-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-172![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition |
CLOSED |
the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex |
2016-06-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-173![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Hiding SPARQL |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Text related to SPARQL definitions needs to be hidden together with query |
2016-07-08 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-174![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Scopenode |
CLOSED |
Scopenode does not use RDF node definition |
2016-07-11 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-175![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) scope naming |
CLOSED |
Alternate naming for term for scope / in-scope |
2016-07-22 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-176![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Rules |
CLOSED |
Should SHACL include a (simple) rules feature |
2016-08-20 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-177![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) abstract-syntax-disconnected |
CLOSED |
Abstract Syntax is disconnected from concrete syntax |
2016-09-07 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-178![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:message constraints |
CLOSED |
Should sh:message be permitted at constraints, too? |
2016-09-21 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-179![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) label annotations |
CLOSED |
Should SHACL include a mechanism to specify display labels? |
2016-09-22 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-180![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Path bnodes |
CLOSED |
Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? |
2016-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-181![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
SHACL conformance for partial validation reports |
2016-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-182![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Validation report |
CLOSED |
Clarifications needed to section 3.0 |
2016-09-29 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-183![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) undefined term |
CLOSED |
Eliminating the term "Undefined" |
2016-10-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-184![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) paths & value nodes |
CLOSED |
Property paths and value nodes |
2016-10-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-185![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) processing order |
CLOSED |
Processing order for filters and constraints |
2016-10-02 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-186![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) validation report properties |
CLOSED |
Properties in validation report mis-use shapes graph properties |
2016-10-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-187![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) severity and message |
CLOSED |
sh:severity and sh:message are not defined as shapes graph properties |
2016-10-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-188![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) define validation |
CLOSED |
"Validation" needs to be defined |
2016-10-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-189![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) validation trigger |
CLOSED |
Clarify validation report trigger in section 3 |
2016-10-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-190![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Shape identification |
CLOSED |
Identifying the shapes in a SHACL Full shapes graph |
2016-10-13 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-191![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Parameter value types |
CLOSED |
Should the value types of parameters be constraints |
2016-10-18 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-192![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Are filter shapes shapes? |
CLOSED |
Should filter shapes be of type sh:Shape? if not, then what? |
2016-10-19 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-193![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Focus nodes |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change |
2016-10-27 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-194![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) valueStem |
CLOSED |
stems in value sets |
2016-11-08 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-195![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) TTL File |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Prepare TTL file for publication |
2016-11-15 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-196![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Delete filters |
CLOSED |
Should we delete filter shapes? |
2016-11-16 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-197![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Defined |
CLOSED |
"Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-198![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdf:langString |
CLOSED |
rdf:langString not included in datatypes |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-199![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Constraint component IRIs |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-200![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Processors/ing |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Processors, processing not defined |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-201![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) node target |
CLOSED |
how does node target specify targets for a shape? |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-202![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Remove pre-binding from core |
CLOSED |
Suggestion to remove pre-binding from core |
2016-11-17 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-203![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Constraint components |
CLOSED |
Constraint component is an IRI |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-204![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Constraint node |
CLOSED |
Fourth node is unclear |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-205![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Validation report |
CLOSED |
Section 1.4 - graph is the result of validation |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-206![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Target node |
CLOSED |
Not clear how a node target specifies targets for a shape |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-207![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Parameters |
CLOSED |
Parameter descriptions for constraint components |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-208![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) $THIS |
CLOSED |
$this in aggregations |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-209![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) What is a shape? |
CLOSED |
What is a shape |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-210![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Expected type |
CLOSED |
value types and expected types |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-211![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) property constraints |
CLOSED |
Eliminate property constraints |
2016-11-20 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-212![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Property constraints |
CLOSED |
Property constraints and focus node constraints |
2016-11-22 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-213![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Finding shapes |
CLOSED |
Finding shapes |
2016-11-22 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-214![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) must & may |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Read through for "must" and "may" |
2016-11-30 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-215![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) literal parameters |
CLOSED |
parameters with a value type that is a datatype |
2016-12-01 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-216![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Style |
CLOSED |
[Editorial] Shall we switch to the (mathematical) style of definitions suggested by Peter? |
2016-12-06 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-217![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Path vs predicate clean up |
CLOSED |
Further clean up of paths versus predicate |
2016-12-09 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-218![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Move annotations |
CLOSED |
Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? |
2017-01-17 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-219![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) One-of shapes |
CLOSED |
Should we add a one-of-a-list-of-shapes operator |
2017-01-24 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-220![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) what is a shape |
CLOSED |
defining shapes in a shapes graph |
2017-01-25 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-221![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:Shape hierarchy |
CLOSED |
Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes |
2017-01-25 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-222![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Pre-binding 2 |
CLOSED |
Response to "On pre-binding" |
2017-01-31 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-223![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Shapes mismatching type |
CLOSED |
Should we disallow shapes with mismatching type |
2017-02-05 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-224![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Improved shape type definitions |
CLOSED |
Can we improve the language around the use of rdf:types for shapes |
2017-02-05 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-225![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Validation Report details |
CLOSED |
Respond to "Validation results and reports" - part 1 |
2017-02-08 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-226![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) JSON-LD @context |
CLOSED |
Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context |
2017-02-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-227![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS |
CLOSED |
Behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS |
2017-02-09 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-228![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Form of the validation report |
CLOSED |
Respond to the comment about the form of the validation report |
2017-02-10 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-229![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) results included in a validation report |
CLOSED |
Respond to the comment about what results to be included in a validation report |
2017-02-10 |
SHACL - Core |
0 |
ISSUE-230![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) $this and $PATH in sh:sparql |
CLOSED |
Inconsistency in the use of $this and $PATH in sh:sparql vs constraint components |
2017-02-10 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-231![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) sh:message in components |
CLOSED |
Could we allow sh:message for constraint components, not just validators? |
2017-02-15 |
SHACL - SPARQL |
0 |
ISSUE-232![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Privacy and Security |
CLOSED |
Respec suggests a section on privacy and security |
2017-02-15 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-233![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Shapes syntax checking |
CLOSED |
Should we require support for checking of well-formed shapes graphs? |
2017-02-21 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |
ISSUE-234![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) Peter 2017-02-22 |
CLOSED |
Public comment https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Feb/0165.html |
2017-02-27 |
SHACL Spec |
0 |