ISSUE-226: Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context
JSON-LD @context
Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Holger Knublauch
- Opened on:
- 2017-02-09
- Description:
- (This is entirely optional and not to hold off any W3C process)
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2017Feb/0010.html there will likely be some value for the adoption of SHACL if there was a de-facto standard ("recommended") JSON-LD serialization context, possibly with framing.
This ticket is to organize the discussion around this topic. - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-48 on Pano Maria to Produce a json-ld @context draft - due 2017-02-22, closed- Related emails:
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-02-09)
- shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-02-09)
Related notes:
Resolution: https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-shapes-minutes.html#item03
Holger Knublauch, 2 Mar 2017, 05:33:20Display change log