[Odrl-version2] Dates and times in constraints

Alapan alapan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 15 20:45:41 EST 2011


What is the reason for the ±HH:MM?

Also - how does this format represent timezone?

Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance


On 10 January 2011 21:03, Francis Cave <francis at franciscave.com> wrote:

> Following discussion in Namur, the Common Vocabulary now states that a
> dateTime should conform to ISO 8601 as represented in W3C XML Schema. Stuart
> Myles has suggested to me that in the ACAP profile we should consider
> constraining this further so that date-times conform to
> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime, i.e. making on the following forms
> valid:
>
>
>
> YYYY-MM-DD for dates
>
> YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS±HH:MM for date-times
>
>
>
> [In case this is garbled by your email reader, that’s a plus-minus between
> ‘SS’ and ‘HH’].
>
>
>
> It may be that this additional constraint won’t make sense for the Common
> Vocabulary, but I thought it worth mentioning.
>
>
>
> Francis Cave
>
> _______________________________________________
> Odrl-version2 mailing list
> Odrl-version2 at odrl.net
> http://odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2_odrl.net
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20110115/1728a8ca/attachment.html>


More information about the Odrl-version2 mailing list