[Odrl-version2] Dates and times in constraints
Francis Cave
francis at franciscave.com
Sun Jan 16 04:20:41 EST 2011
The format in the W3C note mandates the inclusion of the time zone, i.e.
+01:00 for UTC+1 hr, -01:00 for UTC-1hr, etc. I was simply abbreviating this
requirement.
Francis
From: Alapan [mailto:alapan at gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2011 09:46
To: francis at franciscave.com; ODRL-Version2
Subject: Re: [Odrl-version2] Dates and times in constraints
What is the reason for the ±HH:MM?
Also - how does this format represent timezone?
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance
On 10 January 2011 21:03, Francis Cave <francis at franciscave.com> wrote:
Following discussion in Namur, the Common Vocabulary now states that a
dateTime should conform to ISO 8601 as represented in W3C XML Schema. Stuart
Myles has suggested to me that in the ACAP profile we should consider
constraining this further so that date-times conform to
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime, i.e. making on the following forms
valid:
YYYY-MM-DD for dates
YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS±HH:MM for date-times
[In case this is garbled by your email reader, thats a plus-minus between
SS and HH].
It may be that this additional constraint wont make sense for the Common
Vocabulary, but I thought it worth mentioning.
Francis Cave
_______________________________________________
Odrl-version2 mailing list
Odrl-version2 at odrl.net
http://odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2_odrl.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20110115/601c9487/attachment.html>
More information about the Odrl-version2
mailing list