[Odrl-version2] Core Model: Roles, Parties and Assets

[ri at odrl.net]

On 6 Nov 2010, at 02:54, Francis Cave wrote:
> 3. Given the rationale for allowing multiple Parties associated with a Permission / Prohibition, by analogy would it not make sense to allow multiple Assets to be associated with a Permission / Prohibition, with the Role entity used to define the association between Permission / Prohibition and Asset? This would make it possible to express such things as “it is permitted/prohibited to perform Action X on Asset A, where Action X involves Asset B”. The fact that this would also improve the symmetry of Figure 2.1 is a bonus, but probably not significant.

Francis - can you give a real-world-ish example of the above? 
It is not clear in my mind (at the moment!)

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20101108/7a73dcaa/attachment.html>