This document is also available in these non-normative formats: postscript , PDF , XML , and plain text .
Copyright © 2005 W3C ® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability , trademark and document use rules apply.
Web Services Addressing provides transport-neutral mechanisms to address Web services and messages. Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding (this document) defines the binding of the abstract properties defined in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core to SOAP Messages.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is the second <a href= "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#q73"> Public Last Call Working Draft of the Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding specification for review by W3C members and other interested parties. It has been produced by the Web Services Addressing Working Group (WG), which is part of the W3C Web Services Activity .
This Working Draft reflects If the current position of feedback is positive, the Working Group. Group plans to submit this specification for consideration as a W3C Candidate Recommendation .Comments on this document are invited and are to be sent to the public public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org mailing list ( public archive ). Comments can be sent until 11 May 2005 .
A diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is available. For a detailed list of changes since the last publication of this document, please refer to appendix <b> B. Change Log </b> . A <a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/"> list of remaining Issues about this document are documented in the Last Call issues list is also available. maintained by the Working Group.
Discussion of this document takes place on the public-ws-addressing@w3.org mailing list ( public archive ). deleted text: Comments on this specification should be sent to this mailing list.
This document was produced under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy . The Working Group maintains a public list of patent disclosures relevant to this document; that page also includes instructions for disclosing [and excluding] a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification should disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy .
deleted text: Per <a href= "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Exclusion"> section 4 of the W3C Patent Policy </a>, Working Group participants have 150 days from the title page date of this document to exclude essential claims from the W3C RF licensing requirements with respect to this document series. Exclusions are with respect to the exclusion reference document, defined by the W3C Patent Policy to be the latest version of a document in this series that is published no later than 90 days after the title page date of this document. </p> <p> Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
<b> Editorial note </b> | |
The Web Services Addressing Working Group has decided to use XML Schema, where appropriate, to describe constructs defined in this specification. Note that this restricts use of Web Services Addressing to XML 1.0. |
1. <a
href="#tocRange"> Introduction
deleted text:
2. <a href="#_Toc77464317"> Binding
Endpoint References 1.1 Notational
Conventions deleted
text:
3. <a href="#_Toc77464328">
Faults 1.2 Namespaces
deleted text:
4. <a href="#_Toc77464334"> Security
Considerations 2. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0
Feature deleted text:
5. <a href="#_Toc77464336">
References 2.1 Feature Name
deleted text:
A. <a href="#acknowledgments">
Acknowledgements 2.2 Description
deleted text: (Non-Normative)
B. <a href="#changelog"> Change
Log 2.3 Properties
deleted text: (Non-Normative)
</p> </div> <hr /> <div
class="toc"> <h2> <a name="contents" id="contents">
Table of Contents 2.4 Interactions with
Other SOAP Features </h2>
<p class="toc"> 1. <a href="#tocRange">
Introduction
3. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module deleted text:
1.1 <a
href="#_Toc77464315"> Notational Conventions 3.1 Module Name
deleted text:
1.2 <a href=
"#_Toc77464316"> Namespaces 3.2 Description
deleted text:
2. <a href="#_Toc77464317">
3.3 Binding Endpoint
References Message Addressing
Properties deleted text:
3. <a href="#_Toc77464328">
4. SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension
4.1 Extension Name
4.2 Description
5. Faults
deleted text:
3.1 <a
href="#_Toc77464329"> 5.1 Invalid Message Information Header Addressing Property deleted text:
3.2 <a
href="#_Toc77464330"> 5.2 Message Information
Header Addressing Property
Required deleted text:
3.3 <a
href="#_Toc77464331"> 5.3 Destination Unreachable deleted text:
3.4 <a
href="#_Toc55895108"> 5.4 Action Not Supported deleted text:
3.5 <a
href="#_Toc77464333"> 5.5 Endpoint Unavailable deleted text:
4. <a href="#_Toc77464334">
6. Security Considerations deleted text:
5. <a href="#_Toc77464336">
6.1 Additional Considerations for
SOAP Intermediaries
7. References deleted
text:
A. Acknowledgements
(Non-Normative)
B. Change Log (Non-Normative)
B.1 <a
href="#id2272399"> Changes Since
First Second Working Draft deleted text:
B.2 <a
href="#id2272412"> Changes Since First Working Draft
B.3 Changes Since Submission deleted text:
Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core[ WS-Addressing-Core ] defines a set of abstract properties and an XML Infoset [ XML Information Set ] representation thereof to reference Web service endpoints and to facilitate end-to-end addressing of endpoints in messages. Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding (this document) defines the binding of the abstract properties defined in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core to SOAP Messages.
The following example illustrates the use of these mechanisms in a SOAP 1.2 message being sent from http://example.com/business/client1 to http://example.com/fabrikam/Purchasing:
<i> Example 1-1. Use of message addressing properties in a SOAP 1.2 message. </i>
(001) <S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing"> xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing"> (002) <S:Header> (003) <wsa:MessageID> (004) http://example.com/6B29FC40-CA47-1067-B31D-00DD010662DA (005) </wsa:MessageID> (006) <wsa:ReplyTo> (007) <wsa:Address>http://example.com/business/client1</wsa:Address> (008) </wsa:ReplyTo> (009) <wsa:To>http://example.com/fabrikam/Purchasing</wsa:To> (010) <wsa:Action>http://example.com/fabrikam/SubmitPO</wsa:Action> (011) </S:Header> (012) <S:Body> (013) ... (014) </S:Body> (015) </S:Envelope>
Lines (002) to (011) represent the header of the SOAP message where the mechanisms defined in the specification are used. The body is represented by lines (012) to (014).
Lines (003) to (010) contain the message information addressing properties serialized as SOAP header blocks. Specifically, lines (003) to (005) specify the identifier for this message and lines (006) to (008) specify the endpoint to which replies to this message should be sent as an Endpoint Reference. Line (009) specifies the address URI of the ultimate receiver of this message. Line (010) specifies an Action URI IRI identifying expected semantics.
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [ IETF RFC 2119 ].
When describing abstract data models, this specification uses the notational convention used by XML Infoset [ XML Information Set ]. Specifically, abstract property names always appear in square brackets (e.g., [some property]).
When describing concrete XML schemas [ XML Schema Structures , XML Schema Datatypes ], this specification uses the notational convention of WS-Security [ WS-Security ]. Specifically, each member of an element's [children] or [attributes] property is described using an XPath-like notation (e.g., /x:MyHeader/x:SomeProperty/@value1). The use of {any} indicates the presence of an element wildcard (<xs:any/>). The use of @{any} indicates the presence of an attribute wildcard (<xs:anyAttribute/>).
This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes throughout; they are listed in Table 1-1 . Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant (see [ XML Namespaces ]).
Prefix | Namespace |
---|---|
S | http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope |
S11 | http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope |
wsa | http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing |
wsaw | http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/wsdl |
xs | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema |
WS-Addressing is defined in terms of the XML Information Set [ XML Information Set ]. WS-Addressing is conformant to the SOAP 1.2 [ SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework ] processing model and is also compatible with SOAP 1.1[ SOAP 1.1 ] for backwards compatibility. WS-Addressing may be used with WSDL [ WSDL 2.0 ] described services as described in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - WSDL Binding[ WS-Addressing-WSDL ]. The examples in this specification use an XML 1.0 [ XML 1.0 ] representation but this is not a requirement.
All information items defined by WS-Addressing this specification are identified by the XML namespace URI [ XML Namespaces ] "http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing". "http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing". A normative XML Schema [ XML Schema Structures , XML Schema Datatypes ] document can be obtained by dereferencing the XML namespace URI.
This section defines the deleted text: binding of Endpoint references to SOAP messages. 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature.
The SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature is named using the following IRI:
When http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/feature
The SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature provides a SOAP-specific expression of the abstract message needs to addressing properties defined by Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core[ WS-Addressing-Core ].
This feature may be addressed used with any SOAP MEP. A binding that supports this feature MUST provide a means to transmit the endpoint, properties listed above with a message and to reconstitute their values on receipt of a message.
The SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature defines the information contained in following properties:
Corresponds to the endpoint reference is mapped abstract [destination] property.
Corresponds to the message according abstract [source endpoint] property.
Corresponds to deleted text: a transformation that is dependent on the protocol and data representation used abstract [reply endpoint] property.
Corresponds to deleted text: send the message. Protocol-specific mappings (or bindings) will define how abstract [fault endpoint] property.
Corresponds to the information in abstract [message id] property.
Corresponds to the endpoint reference is copied abstract [relationship] property.
Corresponds to deleted text: message and protocol fields. This specification defines the abstract [reference parameters] property.
Corresponds to the abstract [action] property.
If the absence http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/Action property of an applicable policy stating that the SOAP Action feature SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts has a different mapping must be used, value, then the value of the http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/feature/Action property of the SOAP binding defined here is assumed 1.2 Addressing 1.0 feature MUST be identical to apply. it.
The SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module defines a set of SOAP header blocks to support the SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature described in 2. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature . To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all conformant implementations that include support for SOAP 1.2 MUST support the SOAP binding. 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module.
The SOAP binding for endpoint references 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module is defined by identified using the following three rules: IRI:
http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/module
The [address] property in the endpoint reference is copied in SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature (see 2. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature ) defines a set of SOAP properties and their correspondence to the [destination] abstract message information property. addressing properties defined by Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core[ WS-Addressing-Core ]. The infoset SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module uses the XML Infoset representation of the [destination] abstract message addressing properties defined in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core.
When sending a message each property becomes is represented using the appropriate element information item as a SOAP header block block. The resulting header blocks are targetted at the ultimate recipient in the SOAP message. message path (note that extensions to WS-Addressing could be written to specify different targetting). 3.3 Binding Message Addressing Properties describes additional processing required when binding message addressing properties to SOAP header blocks.
deleted text: </li> <li>Each [reference parameter] When receiving a message, the abstract properties are populated from their corresponding element becomes information items in the message. Note that the message addressing properties gathered by an intermediary when receiving a SOAP message do not necessarily get replayed as MAPs when resending the message along the message path.
When a message is be addressed to an endpoint, the values of the SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature properties are mapped to the message as SOAP header block in blocks with the following additional modifications:
The value of the http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/feature/ReferenceParameters property is added to the SOAP message. message header. The element information item of each [reference parameter] (including all of its [children], [attributes] and [in-scope namespaces]) is deleted text: to be added as a SOAP header block in the new message.
Each header block added as a result of the above rule is annotated with a wsa:Type wsa:isReferenceParameter attribute whose value is "parameter". "true".
Each property that is of type IRI MUST be serialized as an absolute IRI in the SOAP message.
The next following example shows how the deleted text: default SOAP binding for endpoint references 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module is used to construct a message addressed to the endpoint:
<i> Example 2-1. 3-1. Example endpoint reference. </i>
<wsa:EndpointReference xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing" xmlns:fabrikam="http://example.com/fabrikam" xmlns:wsdli="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl-instance" wsdli:wsdlLocation="http://example.com/fabrikam http://example.com/fabrikam/fabrikam.wsdl"> <wsa:Address>http://example.com/fabrikam/acct</wsa:Address> <wsa:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsa:InterfaceName> <wsa:Metadata> <wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName> <wsa:Metadata> <wsa:ReferenceParameters> <fabrikam:CustomerKey>123456789</fabrikam:CustomerKey> <fabrikam:ShoppingCart>ABCDEFG</fabrikam:ShoppingCart> </wsa:ReferenceParameters> </wsa:EndpointReference>
According to the mapping rules stated above, the The address value is copied in the "To" header block and the "CustomerKey" and "ShoppingCart" elements should be are copied literally as a header blocks in a SOAP message addressed to this endpoint. The resulting SOAP message would look as follows:
<i> Example 2-2. 3-2. Example endpoint reference mapped to SOAP message header blocks. </i>
<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing" xmlns:fabrikam="http://example.com/fabrikam"> <S:Header> ... <wsa:To>http://example.com/fabrikam/acct</wsa:To> <fabrikam:CustomerKey wsa:Type='parameter'>123456789</fabrikam:CustomerKey> <fabrikam:ShoppingCart wsa:Type='parameter'>ABCDEFG</fabrikam:ShoppingCart> <wsa:Action>...</wsa:Action> <fabrikam:CustomerKey wsa:isReferenceParameter='true'>123456789</fabrikam:CustomerKey> <fabrikam:ShoppingCart wsa:isReferenceParameter='true'>ABCDEFG</fabrikam:ShoppingCart> ... </S:Header> <S:Body> ... </S:Body> </S:Envelope>
The SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension defines a set of SOAP header blocks to support the SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature described in 2. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature .To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all conformant implementations that include support for SOAP 1.1 MUST support the SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension. This SOAP 1.1 extension is provided for backwards compatibility only.
The SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension is identified using the following IRI:
http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/module
The SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature (see 2. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature ) defines a set of SOAP properties and their correspondence to the abstract message addressing properties defined by Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core[ WS-Addressing-Core ]. The SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension uses the XML Infoset representation of the abstract message addressing properties defined in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core and binds each element information item to a SOAP header block. The SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension operates as described in 3. SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module with the following exceptions:
Use of the SOAPAction HTTP header is required when using the SOAP 1.1 HTTP binding. The value of the SOAPAction HTTP header SHOULD be identical to the value of the http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/feature/Action property of the Web Services Addressing 1.0 feature.
The faults defined in this section are generated if the condition stated in the preamble in each subsection is met.
Endpoints compliant with this specification MUST include the required message information addressing properties serialized as SOAP headers on in all fault messages. Fault messages are correlated as replies using the [relationship] property as defined in Section 3. The [action] property below designates WS-Addressing fault messages:
http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/fault http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/fault
The definitions of faults use the following properties:
[Code] The fault code.
[Subcode] The fault subcode.
[Reason] The English language reason element.
[Detail] The detail element. If absent, no detail element is defined for the fault.
The properties above bind to a SOAP 1.2 fault as follows:
<i> Example 3-1. 5-1. Binding of fault properties to SOAP 1.2 messages. </i>
<S:Envelope> <S:Header> <wsa:Action> http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/fault http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/fault </wsa:Action> <!-- Headers elided for clarity. --> </S:Header> <S:Body> <S:Fault> <S:Code> <S:Value>[Code]</S:Value> <S:Subcode> <S:Value>[Subcode]</S:Value> </S:Subcode> </S:Code> <S:Reason> <S:Text xml:lang="en">[Reason]</S:Text> </S:Reason> <S:Detail> [Detail] </S:Detail> </S:Fault> </S:Body> </S:Envelope>
The SOAP 1.1 fault is less expressive and map only [Subcode] and [Reason]. These the properties bind to a SOAP 1.1 fault as follows:
<i> Example 3-2. 5-2. Binding of fault properties to SOAP 1.1 messages. </i>
<S11:Envelope> <S11:Body> <S11:Fault> <faultcode>[Subcode]</faultcode> <faultstring xml:lang="en">[Reason]</faultstring> </S11:Fault> </S11:Body> </S11:Envelope>
A message information header property cannot be processed.
[Code] S:Sender
[Subcode] wsa:InvalidMessageInformationHeader wsa:InvalidMessageAddressingProperty
[Reason] A message information header addressing property is not valid and the message cannot be processed. The validity failure can be either structural or semantic, e.g. a [destination] that is not a URI an IRI or a [relationship] to a [message id] that was never issued.
[Detail] [invalid header] property]
A required message information header addressing property is absent.
[Code] S:Sender
[Subcode] wsa:MessageInformationHeaderRequired wsa:MessageAddressingPropertyRequired
[Reason] A required message information header, To, MessageID, or Action, addressing property is not present.
[Detail] [Missing Header Property QName]
No endpoint can be found capable of acting in the role of the [destination] property.
[Code] S:Sender
[Subcode] wsa:DestinationUnreachable
[Reason] No route can be determined to reach the destination role defined by the WS-Addressing To. [destination].
[Detail] empty
The [action] property in the message is not supported at this endpoint.
The contents of this fault are as follows:
[Code] S:Sender
[Subcode] wsa:ActionNotSupported
[Reason] The [action] cannot be processed at the receiver.
[Detail] [action]
The endpoint is unable to process the message at this time either due to some transient issue or a permanent failure.
The endpoint may optionally include a RetryAfter parameter in the detail. The source should not retransmit the message until this duration has passed.
[Code] S:Receiver
[Subcode] wsa:EndpointUnavailable
[Reason] The endpoint is unable to process the message at this time.
[Detail] <wsa:RetryAfter ...>[xs:NonNegativeInteger]</wsa:RetryAfter>
The following describes the attributes and elements listed above:
This element (of type xs:NonNegativeInteger) xs:nonNegativeInteger) is a suggested minimum duration in milliseconds to wait before retransmitting the message. If this element is omitted from the detail, the value is infinite.
Editorial note: M Hadley | |
The WG seeks feedback on the choice of nonNegativeInteger for this element. Other types considered included unsignedLong, unsignedInt and duration. |
These optional Optional extensibility attributes that do not affect processing.
It is strongly recommended that WS-Addressing message addressing properties serialized as SOAP headers (wsa:To, wsa:Action et al.) including those headers present as a result of the communication between services [reference parameters] property SHOULD be secured using the mechanisms described integrity protected as explained in WS-Security [ Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core[ <a href="#WS-Security"> WS-Security WS-Addressing-Core ]. deleted text: In order to properly secure messages, the body and all relevant headers need to be included in the signature. Specifically, the message information headers described in this specification (e.g. <wsa:To>) need to be signed with the body in order to "bind" the two together. It should be noted that for messages traveling through intermediaries, it is possible that some or all of the message information headers may have multiple signatures when the message arrives at the ultimate receiver. It is strongly recommended that the initial sender include a signature to prevent any spoofing by intermediaries.
Whenever an address is specified (e.g. <wsa:From>, <wsa:ReplyTo>, <wsa:FaultTo>, ...), the processor should ensure that When receiving a signature is provided with claims allowing it to speak for the specified target in order to prevent certain classes of attacks (e.g. redirects). As well, care should be taken if the specified endpoint contains reference parameters as unverified endpoint references could cause SOAP message, certain classes of header insertion attacks. </p> <p> The message information SOAP headers deleted text: blocks may have their contents encrypted in order to obtain end-to-end privacy, but care should be taken to ensure that intermediary processors have access to required information (e.g. <wsa:To>). </p> <p> Some processors may use message identifiers (<wsa:MessageID>) as part of a uniqueness metric in order to detect replays of messages. Care should be taken to ensure that a unique identifier is actually used. For example, it may be appropriate in some scenarios to combine resulting from the message identifier with a timestamp. </p> <p> The following list summarizes common classes serialization of attacks that apply to this protocol an EPR's [reference parameters] property. The SOAP message receiver MAY perform additional security and identifies the mechanism sanity checks to prevent/mitigate the attacks: </p> <ul> <li> <p> Message alteration – Alteration is prevented by including signatures of the message information using WS-Security. </p> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p> Message disclosure – Confidentiality is preserved by encrypting sensitive data using WS-Security. prevent unintended actions.
</li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p> Address spoofing – Address spoofing is prevented by ensuring that all address are signed by a party authorized to speakAccountability – Accountability is a function of To avoid breaking signatures, intermediaries MUST NOT change the type of and strength XML representation of the key WS-Addressing headers. Specifically, intermediaries MUST NOT remove XML content that explicitly indicates otherwise-implied content, and algorithms being used. In many cases, a strong symmetric key provides sufficient accountability. However, in some environments, strong PKI signatures are required. </p> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p> Availability – All reliable messaging services are subject intermediaries MUST NOT insert XML content to make implied values explicit. For instance, if a variety of availability attacks. Replay detection RelationshipType attribute is present with a common attack and it is recommended that this be addressed by the mechanisms described in WS-Security and/or caching of message identifiers. Other attacks, such as network-level denial of service attacks are harder to avoid and are outside the scope value of this specification. That said, care should be taken to ensure that minimal state "http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing/reply", an intermediary MUST NOT remove it; similarly, if there is saved prior to any authenticating sequences. </p> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p> Replay – Messages may be replayed for a variety of reasons. To detect and eliminate this attack, mechanisms should be used to identify replayed messages such as the timestamp/nonce outlined in WS-Security. Alternatively, and optionally, other technologies, such as sequencing, can also be used to prevent replay of application messages. no RelationshipType attribute, an intermediary MUST NOT add one.
</li> </ul>This document is the work of the W3C Web Service Addressing Working Group .
Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by alphabetical order): Abbie Barbir (Nortel Networks), Rebecca Bergersen (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Andreas Bjärlestam (ERICSSON), Ugo Corda (SeeBeyond Technology Corporation), Francisco Curbera (IBM Corporation), Glen Daniels (Sonic Software), Paul Downey (BT), Jacques Durand (Fujitsu Limited), Michael Eder (Nokia), Robert Freund (Hitachi, Ltd.), Yaron Goland (BEA Systems, Inc.), Martin Gudgin (Microsoft Corporation), Arun Gupta (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Hugo Haas (W3C/ERCIM), Marc Hadley (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), David Hull (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Yin-Leng Husband (HP), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle Corporation), Paul Knight (Nortel Networks), Philippe Le Hégaret (W3C/MIT), Mark Little (Arjuna Technologies Ltd.), Jonathan Marsh (Microsoft Corporation), Jeff Mischkinsky (Oracle Corporation), Nilo Mitra (ERICSSON), Eisaku Nishiyama (Hitachi, Ltd.), Mark Nottingham (BEA Systems, Inc.), Ales Novy (Systinet Inc.), David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.), Mark Peel (Novell, Inc.), deleted text: Harris Reynolds (webMethods, Inc.), Tony Rogers (Computer Associates), Tom Rutt (Fujitsu Limited), Rich Salz (DataPower Technology, Inc.), Davanum Srinivas (Computer Associates), Jiri Tejkl (Systinet Inc.), Greg Truty (IBM Corporation), Steve Vinoski (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Pete Wenzel (SeeBeyond Technology Corporation), Steve Winkler (SAP AG), Ümit Yalçınalp (SAP AG). AG), Prasad Yendluri (webMethods, Inc.).
Previous members of the Working Group were: @@@. Lisa Bahler (SAIC - Telcordia Technologies), Marc Goodner (SAP AG), Harris Reynolds (webMethods, Inc.).
The people who have contributed to discussions on public-ws-addressing@w3.org are also gratefully acknowledged.
Date | Editor | Description |
---|---|---|
2005-03-21 @ 23:15 | mgudgin | Added sentence about SOAP 1.1 to section 4 |
2005-03-18 @ 23:21 | mgudgin | s/Addresssing/Addressing |
2005-03-10 @ 03:40 | mhadley | Incorporated additional editorial fixes from J. Marsh. |
2005-03-10 @ 03:16 | mhadley | Incorporated additional issue resolution text for issues 7 and 44 from H. Haas. |
2005-03-10 @ 02:06 | mhadley | Incorporated editorial fixes from J. Marsh. |
2005-03-09 @ 07:11 | mhadley | Fixed example that didn't reflect the chnage from wsa:Type to wsa:isReferenceParameter |
2005-03-08 @ 20:50 | mhadley | Added resolution to issue 53 (schema tweaks) |
2005-03-02 @ 21:18 | mhadley | Added resolution to issue 4 |
2005-03-02 @ 20:30 | mhadley | Added resolution to issue 7 |
2005-03-02 @ 19:36 | mhadley | Added resolution to issues 22 and 51/ |
2005-02-28 @ 22:08 | mhadley | Added resolution to issues 24 and 26 |
2005-02-27 @ 19:42 | mhadley | Changed URI to IRI where appropriate. |
2005-02-17 @ 15:37 | mhadley | Added issue 47 resolution |
2005-02-15 @ 22:06 | mhadley | Fixed some references to message information headers to message information properties |
Date | Editor | Description |
---|---|---|
2005-02-01 @ 19:49 | mhadley | Removed several occurances of the word 'identify' when used with endpoint references. Replaced with 'reference' or 'address' as appropriate. |
2005-01-24 @ 20:22 | mgudgin | Removed spurious reference to section 3.3.2 from Section 3 |
2005-01-23 @ 21:11 | mgudgin | Incorporated resolution of issue i008; added wsa:Type attribute to reference parameters |
2005-01-20 @ 13:10 | mgudgin | Removed text from first paragraph of section 3 per resolution of issue i040 |
2005-01-16 @ 22:41 | mgudgin | s/PortType/InterfaceName in certain examples |
2004-12-16 @ 18:20 | mhadley | Added resolution to issue 19 - WSDL version neutrality |
2004-12-16 @ 16:50 | mhadley | Added issue 33 resolution |
2004-12-14 @ 20:10 | mhadley | Switched back to edcopy formatting |
2004-12-14 @ 20:02 | mhadley | Enhanced auto-changelog generation to allow specification of data ranges for logs. Split change log to show changes between early draft and first working draft and changes since first working draft. |
2004-12-14 @ 18:13 | mhadley | Added resolutions for issues 12 (EPR lifecycle), 37 (relationship from QName to URI) and 39 (spec name versioning) |
Date | Editor | Description |
---|---|---|
2004-11-24 @ 15:32 | mhadley | Added note that addressing is backwards compatible with SOAP 1.1 |
2004-11-23 @ 21:38 | mhadley | Updated titles of examples. Fixed table formatting and references. Replaced uuid URIs with http URIs in examples. Added document status. |
2004-11-07 @ 02:03 | mhadley | Second more detailed run through to separate core, SOAP and WSDL document contents. Removed dependency on WS-Policy. Removed references to WS-Trust and WS-SecurityPolicy |
2004-11-02 @ 22:25 | mhadley | Removed static change log and added dynamically generated change log from cvs. |
2004-10-28 @ 17:05 | mhadley | Initial cut of separating specification into core, soap and wsdl |