This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
The recently added tests for higher order functions contain spec-citations with section-number="$$HOFSEC" and section-pointer="$$HOF" The DTD at the top of XQTSCatalog.xml declares these attributes as NMTOKENS: <!ATTLIST spec-citation section-number NMTOKEN #REQUIRED > <!ATTLIST spec-citation section-pointer NMTOKEN #REQUIRED > Thus the catalog is invalid.
Sorry about that, should now be fixed. Anyone know why we have a DTD for the catalog (as well as a schema), and why the DTD imposes constraints that are not present in the schema? We seem to be making our lives unnecessarily difficult. The reason I didn't include the section numbers in the tests is of course that (a) there isn't yet a published spec that integrates the higher-order-functions specification, so the section number isn't known, and (b) if there were, it could presumably change before release.