This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 25258 - "The canceled activation steps consist of setting the checkedness and the element's indeterminate IDL attribute back to the values they had before the pre-click activation steps were run." even if it' [...]
Summary: "The canceled activation steps consist of setting the checkedness and the ele...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-04-04 11:03 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2014-05-08 17:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2014-04-04 11:03:36 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/states-of-the-type-attribute.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#checkbox-state-(type=checkbox)
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#checkbox-state-(type=checkbox)
Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-input-element.html

Comment:
"The canceled activation steps consist of setting the checkedness and the
element's indeterminate IDL attribute back to the values they had before the
pre-click activation steps were run." even if it's no longer a checkbox?
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2918

Posted from: 90.230.218.37 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.76 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1432.31 (Edition Next)
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2014-05-07 20:47:58 UTC 
Firefox seems to match the spec here. I don't see much value in making it more complicated; is there a compat need or something?
Comment 2 Simon Pieters 2014-05-08 08:51:47 UTC 
I just found it bogus. But it's actually fine I think.
Comment 3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2014-05-08 17:52:16 UTC 
Ok. Thanks!