This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
"var service = new Worker("http://example.com/adorable/service/worker.js");" Olli points out that this will either throw an exception or will need to run in the context of http://example.com, which is not what we expect.
It looks like the way to do this is with an IFRAME. But if you want encapsulation, you need two nested IFRAMEs. Time to buy more RAM.
(In reply to comment #1) > It looks like the way to do this is with an IFRAME. But if you want > encapsulation, you need two nested IFRAMEs. Time to buy more RAM. Perhaps we should just nix this section from explainer? We'll work through this via WebAppSec+WebApps group collaboration and then add to explainer when there's something to report.
Nixed in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/00f6b281ba9b