Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2016.02.18
From RDF Data Shapes Working Group
Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes The US and Europe should be back on the usual time offset, but please effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20160218T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2f433ba94951cf59f6da984c15500e5e To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360 IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link) To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Contents
- 1 Admin
- 2 ISSUE-68: pre-binding
- 3 ISSUE-92: additive repeated properties
- 4 ISSUE-47: sparqling-shape-graph
- 5 ISSUE-121: # in graph name
- 6 ISSUE-99: special cases
- 7 ISSUE-105: defined prefixes
- 8 ISSUE-106: annotations properties
- 9 ISSUE-107: annotations v. arguments
- 10 Other open issues, time permitting
- 11 AOB
Admin
- Chair: Arnaud
- Scribe: Dimitris Kontokostas, or first available on the scribe list.
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 11 February 2016 Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-shapes-minutes.html
Next meeting
- 2016.02.25
ISSUE-68: pre-binding
Can we close ISSUE-68: pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec?
ISSUE-92: additive repeated properties
Discuss ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive?
ISSUE-47: sparqling-shape-graph
Discuss ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?
ISSUE-121: # in graph name
Discuss ISSUE-121: Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character
- Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies which might be useful for solving this issue (esp. Appendix B: URI namespaces)
ISSUE-99: special cases
Discuss ISSUE-99: special treatment of rdfs:Resource and rdf:List in sh:valueClass (and possibly elsewhere)
ISSUE-105: defined prefixes
Discuss ISSUE-105: SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined
ISSUE-106: annotations properties
Discuss ISSUE-106: Annotation properties are not defined well