[Odrl-version2] How to Specify Attribution?

[Francis Cave]

Yes, this accords with what I understood we discussed and agreed in Namur.

 

Francis Cave

 

 

 

From: odrl-version2-bounces at odrl.net [mailto:odrl-version2-bounces at odrl.net]
On Behalf Of ri at odrl.net
Sent: 10 January 2011 05:44
To: ODRL-Version2
Subject: Re: [Odrl-version2] How to Specify Attribution?

 

 

On 29 Dec 2010, at 07:02, Myles, Stuart wrote:





In looking at
http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?comments_parentId=3
<http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?comments_parentId=3&forumId
=1> &forumId=1 it appears that we toyed with specifying the exact string to
use for attribution.

 

We decided at Namur to not support the internal asset - and let the
communities decide how to "package" ODRL with other content.



However, the thread ends up by saying "Files that have to be transported
along with a Policy should be combined with it with mechanisms that are
defined elsewhere." I think that this means that when there is a duty of
attribution (or attribute) then the exact string to use for attribution is
not specified in the ODRL.  Is that right?

Yes. We currently say that "attribute" may link to an Asset for the
attribution information.



Is there an example anywhere of the right way to do it?

Something like:

 

  ....

   <o:duty uid="d1">

            <o:action name="o:attribute"/>

            <o:asset uid="#attributeAsset"/>

   </o:duty>

  .....

<dc:creator xml:id="attributeAsset">Mary Smith</dc:creator>

 ....

 

Does that seem ok?

 

Cheers

 

Renato Iannella

ODRL Initiative

http://odrl.net

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20110110/97308530/attachment.html>