[Odrl-version2] Assignee / Assignees - new possible solution

[ri at odrl.net]

On 26 Mar 2010, at 19:50, Daniel Pähler wrote:

> We suggest that the separate association "Assignees" be dropped, and that 
> "Assignee" be enhanced with an additional property which explains how 
> "Assignee" is to be interpreted if the respective Party is a group. The actual 
> names for that property and its values are of course subject to discussion, 
> but my suggestion would be to name the property "scope", with the possible 
> values "group" and "individuals" (which I hope to be self-explaining).

Hi Daniel/Andreas.....this is a good idea.....perhaps we can take it a little further
and make the complete relationship between Party and Permission/Prohibit/Duty:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen shot 2010-03-29 at 11.25.44.png
Type: image/png
Size: 17845 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://odrl.net/pipermail/odrl-version2_odrl.net/attachments/20100329/dadf4bcb/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------


Where:
  role = {Assigner, Assigner}
  scope = {Individual, Group}


Comments?

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net