[Odrl-version2] Core Model corrected / Input on Duties in wiki

[ri at odrl.net]

Daniel/Andreas - thanks for this great work!

Renato

On 24 Jun 2010, at 23:51, Daniel Pähler wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> since our last Skype conference, the Koblenz fraction has finished several of 
> our tasks, which I'd like to inform you about.
> 
> Andreas and I have gone through the latest Core Model Draft Specification [1], 
> correcting several small errors (e.g., it still referred to the Core Profile in 
> several places) and especially unifying the syntax highlighting. After 
> consulting Renato, we uploaded this document without a new version number, 
> since the actual content was not changed. If you still want the old document, 
> it can be found at [2], but it is not linked to from anywhere else.
> 
> By and large, the document looks like before, but when looked at closely, it 
> should now follow the style guide more accurately. Since this style guide was 
> rather implicit before, we took the liberty of creating an explicit style 
> guide and putting it into the wiki [3].
> 
> Regarding our action points for the Common Vocabulary / Duties, we talked 
> about how the Duties can be realized without the "Object" entity, but with our 
> suggested structure involving an Asset and a "secondAgent" relation. I wrote 
> our results down in the new wiki [4] since the version in the PBworks wiki had 
> not actually been worked on and since we had agreed to migrate to the new wiki 
> as soon as it's available.
> 
> When we talked about the Duties, we did not only add the above mentioned 
> suggestions, but we also tried to make the whole table, i.e. the identifiers, 
> explanations and comments clearer and easier to understand. I think we could 
> benefit from the wiki character by simply working in the article itself; 
> Tikiwiki might even have some other features that could be useful for us to 
> discuss the possible changes (forums?).
> 
> What we have not yet done is create a table for the Duties with three extra 
> columns "Semantics if used as Permission", "Semantics if used as Prohibition", 
> "Semantics if used as Duty", but if we actually agree to have these columns in 
> the Common Vocabulary for each action, they can still be made after we have 
> discussed the semantics in general.
> 
> A final note: before any of you begins editing pages in the new wiki, I'd 
> recommend you read the "Notes for contributors" that I put on the wiki's main 
> page [5], so you hopefully won't have all the trouble with Tikiwiki that 
> Andreas and I had.
> 
> We hope to get some feedback soon!
> Greetings from Koblenz,
> Daniel
> 
> 
> [1] http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090923.html (new version)
> [2] http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090923_oldsyntax.html (old version)
> [3] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Style+Guide
> [4] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Common+Vocabulary+%2F+Duties
> [5] http://odrl.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=HomePage
> -- 
> Dipl.-Inform. Daniel Pähler
> 
> Institute for IS Research
> University of Koblenz-Landau
> Universitaetsstrasse 1
> D-56070 Koblenz
> Fon +49-(0)261-287-2644
> _______________________________________________
> Odrl-version2 mailing list
> Odrl-version2 at odrl.net
> http://odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2_odrl.net

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net