Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Teleconference.2008.04.16/Agenda
From OWL
Contents
Call in details
If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
- Date of Call: Wednesday April 16, 2008
- Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
- Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
- Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
- Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
- Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
- IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
- Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
- Duration: 90 minutes
- Chair: Ian Horrocks
- Scribe: Uli Sattler (Scribe List)
- Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2008.04.16/Agenda
Agenda
- ADMIN (20 min)
- Roll call
- Agenda amendments
- Mention OWL-RDF compatibility draft http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#OWL_Compatibility
- F2F3 - where and when? (remember 8 weeks advance notice requirement)
- Minutes of Monday's UFDTF meeting, where are they?
- PROPOSED: Accept F2F2 Minutes
- PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (9 April)
- Action items status
- Pending Review Actions
- Action 76 Arrange HP review of OWL Prime page / Jeremy Carroll
- Action 86 Send proposal for issue-91 ontology property / Jeremy Carroll
- Action 90 Summarize problem with bnodes in ISSUE-3 vs bnodes in OWL list / Jeremy Carroll
- Action 100 Put n3 version of rules on wiki with pointer to documentation. All to review and discuss via email / James Hendler
- Action 102 Work with Michael to clarify semantics of deprecatedclass so that Peter becomes happy / James Hendler
- Action 115 Update the RDF mapping with the accepted resolution of ISSUE-12 as per Peter's suggestion / Boris Motik
- Action 116 Add a note to the fragments document regarding possible later extension of DL Lite / Boris Motik
- Action 117 RAISE issue on relationship between OWL-R non-entailments and OWL-Full entailments, and link to it from Fragments as EDITORIAL NOTE / Jeremy Carroll
- Action 125 Draft the "humble" editor's note / SOTD request for comments for Primer / Bijan Parsia
- Action 126 Add a from-community section for OWL 1.0 users, to Primer / Bijan Parsia
- Action 130 Propose a way to reintroduce annotations into the structural specification and to provide RDF mappings / Boris Motik
- Due and overdue Actions
- Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremy, Alan / Sandro Hawke
- Action 112 Review syntax document as reference - what is needed? / Evan Wallace
- Action 119 Review Carsten's charge / Bernardo Cuenca Grau
- Action 120 Add sentence "Although we don't specifically document OWL lite in this document, it is the intention of the WG that all OWL Lite ontologiies witll be OWL 1.1 DL ontologies" to Fragments / Alan Ruttenberg
- Action 124 Make sure that namespaces work right in the hello world example, and that the "separate document" link goes to the schema rather than the wiki page / Sandro Hawke
- Action 127 Review primer+editorial changes after Bijan is done making them / Deborah McGuinness
- Action 133 Update the structural spec to add anonymous individuals; no mention about semantics so far / Boris Motik
- Action 134 Set up F2F calendar poll / Sandro Hawke
- Pending Review Actions
- Issues (65 minutes)
- Raised Issues
- Issue 110 Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification
- Issue 111 There's no way to signal the intended semantics of an OWL document
- Issue 112 Universal property (a.k.a. universal role) missing in current OWL2 documents
- Issue 113 Some OWL-R nonentailments are OWL-Full entailments
- Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be allowed?
- Issue 115 Icon needed for the WG pages
- Issue 116 Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full?
- Resolved Editorial Issues
- Proposals to Resolve Issues
- Issue 76 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0165.html
- Issue 77 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0165.html
- Issue 80 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0165.html
- Issue 67 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0236.html
- Issue 81 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0227.html (revised)
- Issue 9 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0174.html
- Issue 60 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0174.html
- Other Issue Discussions
- Issue 71 create datarange of literals matching given language range
- Issue 16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Mar/0168.html
- Raised Issues
- General Discussions (0 min)
- Additional other business (5 min)
Next Week(s)
- General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
- Fragments and Conformance
- Imports
- OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility)
- Versioning
- Easy Keys
- Rich Annotations
- Test Cases
Regrets
JeffPan
back to Meetings