W3C

Edit comment LC-2680 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-2679 Next: LC-2681

Comment LC-2680
:
Commenter: Duff Johnson <djohnson@commonlook.com>

or
SC 2.4.5 - No advice is given here, and I'n not sure what advice could be given. Individual pages are themselves rarely "locations" in the same sense as web-pages. After all, no-one ever produces a table of contents that lists every page in a document unless (for example) headings are present on every page.

For this reason the idea of having "more than one way… to locate a web page" is inapplicable in instances where the _only_ "way" is the physical and/or logical page number. Speaking of which… would this SC be referring (in electronic documents) to "locating" the physical page or the logical page?, if any? I'm guessing it's the physical page, but I just don't know.
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2680.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:40:44 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org