This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Other specs in this tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2426 LC-2427 LC-2428 LC-2430 LC-2431 LC-2432 LC-2433 LC-2434 LC-2435 LC-2436 LC-2437 LC-2438 LC-2439 LC-2440 LC-2441 LC-2442 LC-2443 LC-2444 LC-2445 LC-2446 LC-2447 LC-2448 LC-2449 LC-2450 LC-2451 LC-2456 LC-2457 LC-2458 LC-2459 LC-2460 LC-2465 LC-2466 LC-2467 LC-2469 LC-2471 LC-2475 LC-2481 LC-2482 LC-2483 LC-2491 LC-2492 LC-2493 LC-2494 LC-2496 LC-2500
Previous: LC-2442 Next: LC-2466
The test as it stands is not particularly useful as it does not specify the viewport size, which will have an effect on scalability and occurrence of clipped text and text overlapping. It also does not specify what it means that "text size can be increased to 200% of the original size" - is the requirement that the text is still legible / not clipped? Proposed Change: If the test is to determine whether enlarged text is still usable / legible (and this is the only meaningful test), the viewport / window size to be used in the test must be specified (WAT and Web developer toolbar allow the setting of the window to 1024 x 768 px, for example), and criteria for compliance must be given (e.g. "the text is still fully legible (i.e. no parts are clipped, boxed do not overlap).