w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Thorough review of ACT Rules Format 1.0 and ACT Rules
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2017-09-21 to 2017-10-10.
2 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft
For detailed review: ACT Rules Format 1.0 WD (12 Sep)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail and have no comments. That is, I would approve it as a final W3C standard as-is. | |
| I reviewed ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail and have comments, which I provided as GitHub issues or in the comments below. | 1 |
| I did not review ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail, and abstain from commenting. I will accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Tobias Christian Jensen | I reviewed ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail and have comments, which I provided as GitHub issues or in the comments below. | See, which I still believe to be quite relevant: https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/109 Would fit better as a kind of Requirement for a test rule. Also we should consider removing the more fluffy "Scripts" and "Templates" from the list of test subject types, as they are more likely to cause confusion than to help. If you come to need these types when developing rules, you will be able to specify them then to properly fit the purpose of your rule. |
| Romain Deltour | I did not review ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail, and abstain from commenting. I will accept the decision of the group. | Sorry, it's been a super busy month. I do intend to review in detail at the very latest before TPAC. |
2. Sample ACT Rules
For detailed review: Sample ACT Rules
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail and have no comments. That is, I would approve it as a final W3C standard as-is. | 1 |
| I reviewed the sample ACT Rules in detail and have comments, which I provided as GitHub issues or in the comments below. | |
| I did not review ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail, and abstain from commenting. I will accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Sample ACT Rules | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Tobias Christian Jensen | I reviewed ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail and have no comments. That is, I would approve it as a final W3C standard as-is. | |
| Romain Deltour | I did not review ACT Rules Format 1.0 in detail, and abstain from commenting. I will accept the decision of the group. |
3. ACT Implementation
Following your review of the ACT Rules Format and the sample ACT Rules, consider how feasible it would be for your organization to develop test rules in this format, or map your existing rules to it. Consider publicly available test rules, if you do not develop test rules.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| The test rules I considered fully map to the ACT Rules Format. | 2 |
| I noticed some mapping issues between the test rules I considered and the ACT Rules Format, which I provided as GitHub issues or in the comments below. | |
| I have no opinions on this matter. I will accept the decision of the group. |
Details
| Responder | ACT Implementation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Tobias Christian Jensen | The test rules I considered fully map to the ACT Rules Format. | |
| Romain Deltour | The test rules I considered fully map to the ACT Rules Format. | Barring anything I could have identified I had actually reviewed the spec in detail, from what I'm aware of the spec it's compatible with DAISY’s work. |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Wilco Fiers
- Alastair Campbell
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Kathy Eng
- Daniel Montalvo
- Helen Burge
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project