w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF Weekly Survey - 22 February 2017
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2017-02-20 to 2017-02-22.
6 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Resolutions of 15 February 2017
- Review Proposal for Issue #29: Section 5.2 Test Cases
- Availability for CSUN Face-to-Face meeting
1. Resolutions of 15 February 2017
Please read the 15 February 2017 ACT teleconference meeting minutes. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the ACT Task Force Minutes wiki page.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | 6 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have questions, explained below. |
Details
| Responder | Resolutions of 15 February 2017 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Wilco Fiers | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Romain Deltour | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Maureen Kraft | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Kathleen Wahlbin | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. |
2. Review Proposal for Issue #29: Section 5.2 Test Cases
Review the proposed content for Issue #29: Draft section 5.2 Test Cases in pull request 54. Should pull request 54 be merged?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 3 |
| Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | 3 |
| No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request. |
Details
| Responder | Review Proposal for Issue #29: Section 5.2 Test Cases | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | |
| Romain Deltour | Yes | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | Working on updating based upon feedback from Wilco. |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | |
| Kathleen Wahlbin | Yes |
3. Availability for CSUN Face-to-Face meeting
We have tentatively set up a face-to-face meeting at CSUN for 1-4PM on Tuesday 28 Feb. 2017. Please indicate your availability to participate and add comments if you wish to provide more detail. The agenda will be posted soon.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I can attend in person. | 5 |
| Yes, I can attend via telephone, if that option is available. | |
| No, I cannot attend. | 1 |
Details
| Responder | Availability for CSUN Face-to-Face meeting | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | Yes, I can attend in person. | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, I can attend in person. | |
| Romain Deltour | No, I cannot attend. | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes, I can attend in person. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, I can attend in person. | |
| Kathleen Wahlbin | Yes, I can attend in person. |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Alastair Campbell
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Kathy Eng
- Daniel Montalvo
- Helen Burge
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project