w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF Weekly Survey - 18 January 2017
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2017-01-11 to 2017-01-18.
3 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Resolutions of 11 January 2017
- Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft Section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data
- Review Proposal for Issue #33: Draft Section 6.1 Output Data
- Review Proposal for Issue #39: Rework Rule Description section
1. Resolutions of 11 January 2017
Please read the 11 January 2017 ACT teleconference meeting minutes. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the ACT Task Force Minutes wiki page.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | 3 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have questions, explained below. |
Details
| Responder | Resolutions of 11 January 2017 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. | |
| Maureen Kraft | I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. |
2. Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft Section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data
Review the proposed content for section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data in pull request 32. Wilco is looking for feedback and suggestions for changes.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| The text is fine as-is. | |
| My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request. | 3 |
Details
| Responder | Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft Section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request. | Comments were left last week, have nothing additional. |
| Maureen Kraft | My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request. | Not sure why a rule "must take accessibility support data, and use it in addition to the test page (or other test subject) to determine passing of failing of the rule" especially when it should be written independently of accessibility support. |
3. Review Proposal for Issue #33: Draft Section 6.1 Output Data
Review the proposed content for Section 6.1 Output Data in pull request 41. Should pull request 41 be merged?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes. | 1 |
| Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | 1 |
| No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request. |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Review Proposal for Issue #33: Draft Section 6.1 Output Data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | Yes. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | |
| Maureen Kraft |
4. Review Proposal for Issue #39: Rework Rule Description section
Review the proposed content for the Rule Description section in pull request 42. Should pull request 42 be merged?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes. | 1 |
| Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | 1 |
| No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request. |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Review Proposal for Issue #39: Rework Rule Description section | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | Yes. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. | Editorial comments left in pull request. |
| Maureen Kraft |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Romain Deltour
- Wilco Fiers
- Alastair Campbell
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Kathy Eng
- Daniel Montalvo
- Helen Burge
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
- Sage Keriazes
- Shunguo Yan
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project