W3C

Results of Questionnaire ACT TF Weekly Survey - 11 January 2017

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2017-01-04 to 2017-01-11.

3 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 4 January 2017
  2. Review Proposal for Issue #17: Need instructions for contributing to WCAG-ACT repository
  3. Review Proposal for Issue #26: Draft section 4.1 Test Input Types
  4. Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data

1. Resolutions of 4 January 2017

Please read the 4 January 2017 ACT teleconference meeting minutes. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the ACT Task Force Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear. 3
I have reviewed the minutes but have questions, explained below.

Details

Responder Resolutions of 4 January 2017Comments
Shadi Abou-Zahra I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear.
Maureen Kraft I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear.
Mary Jo Mueller I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions, they seem clear.

2. Review Proposal for Issue #17: Need instructions for contributing to WCAG-ACT repository

Review the proposed content in pull request 30. Should pull request 30 be merged?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes. 1
Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. 2
No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request.

Details

Responder Review Proposal for Issue #17: Need instructions for contributing to WCAG-ACT repositoryComments
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes.
Maureen Kraft Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. See review in pull request. https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/30
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.

3. Review Proposal for Issue #26: Draft section 4.1 Test Input Types

Review the proposed content for Section 4.1 Test Input Types in pull request 31. Should pull request 31 be merged?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes.
Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. 3
No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request.

Details

Responder Review Proposal for Issue #26: Draft section 4.1 Test Input Types Comments
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.
Maureen Kraft Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request. Feedback in the pull request.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.

4. Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data

Review the proposed content for section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data in pull request 32. Wilco is looking for feedback and suggestions for changes.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
The text is fine as-is. 1
My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request. 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Review Proposal for Issue #27: Draft section 4.2 Accessibility Support Data Comments
Shadi Abou-Zahra The text is fine as-is.
Maureen Kraft
Mary Jo Mueller My feedback and suggestions for improvements are in the comments of the pull request.

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Wilco Fiers
  5. Alastair Campbell
  6. Detlev Fischer
  7. Chris Loiselle
  8. Jonathan Avila
  9. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  10. Charles Adams
  11. Kathy Eng
  12. Daniel Montalvo
  13. Helen Burge
  14. Todd Libby
  15. Thomas Brunet
  16. Catherine Droege
  17. Suji Sreerama
  18. Shane Dittmar
  19. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire