W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Review ACT TF draft decision-making process

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-10-06 to 2020-10-22.

7 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Review for completeness
  3. Review for clarity
  4. Review for editorial changes
  5. Other questions or concerns
  6. Readiness to take to AG WG

1. Instructions

Review the draft of the ACT TF decision making process and answer the questions in this survey.

If you find issues, provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Wilco Fiers
Trevor Bostic
Mary Jo Mueller
Daniel Montalvo
Levon Spradlin
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Kathy Eng

2. Review for completeness

Does the decision making process explain all of the processes the ACT TF uses for decision-making, or is something missing?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making. 7
No. I think there are some things missing, documented below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Review for completeness Comments
Wilco Fiers Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Trevor Bostic Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Daniel Montalvo Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Levon Spradlin Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.
Kathy Eng Yes. It covers the processes we use for decision-making.

3. Review for clarity

Is the decision-making process clear, or are there elements described that are confusing?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable. 7
No. I find some things confusing which I have documented below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

Details

Responder Review for clarityComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Trevor Bostic Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Daniel Montalvo Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Levon Spradlin Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.
Kathy Eng Yes, the decision-making process is clear and understandable.

4. Review for editorial changes

Do you have any editorial changes?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have some changes to suggest, documented in comments below. 1
No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes. 6

Details

Responder Review for editorial changesComments
Wilco Fiers No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.
Trevor Bostic No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.
Mary Jo Mueller No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.
Daniel Montalvo No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.
Levon Spradlin No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes, I have some changes to suggest, documented in comments below. As discussed, I moved the Decisions Policy here:
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/blob/master/ACT-Task-Force-Decision-Policy.md

And propose the following editorial updates:
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/494
Kathy Eng No. I think the document is fine as-is and have no further changes.

5. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about the decision-making process?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below.
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 7

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Daniel Montalvo No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Levon Spradlin No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Shadi Abou-Zahra No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Kathy Eng No, I have no further questions or concerns.

6. Readiness to take to AG WG

The Accessibility Guidelines Working Group needs to approve the process before it is considered complete. Do you think the ACT TF Decision Making Process is ready to take to the AGWG for their approval?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is. 6
Yes, it is ready to to get approved by the AG WG with the following changes. 1
No, it is not ready to take to the AG WG. The reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness to take to AG WGComments
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.
Daniel Montalvo Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.
Levon Spradlin Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.
Shadi Abou-Zahra Yes, it is ready to to get approved by the AG WG with the following changes. See question #4 above with proposed changes (for editors' discretion)
Kathy Eng Yes, it is ready to get approved by the AG WG as-is.

More details on responses

  • Trevor Bostic: last responded on 15, October 2020 at 12:21 (UTC)
  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 15, October 2020 at 12:45 (UTC)
  • Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 15, October 2020 at 12:55 (UTC)
  • Levon Spradlin: last responded on 15, October 2020 at 12:58 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 20, October 2020 at 11:43 (UTC)
  • Kathy Eng: last responded on 22, October 2020 at 02:11 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Alastair Campbell
  5. Detlev Fischer
  6. Chris Loiselle
  7. Jonathan Avila
  8. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  9. Charles Adams
  10. Helen Burge
  11. Todd Libby
  12. Thomas Brunet
  13. Catherine Droege
  14. Suji Sreerama
  15. Shane Dittmar
  16. Nayan Padrai
  17. Sage Keriazes
  18. Shunguo Yan

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.