W3C

Results of Questionnaire Final issues before FPWD

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-02-08 to 2016-02-22.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Address JB's comment on international perspective #8
  2. Change to focus on ICT more broadly #9
  3. Change to scope and definition #10
  4. Scope and specificity #16
  5. Update requirements.html #18
  6. Separate color from contrast #15
  7. Factual Correction #17
  8. User Needs - specific settings #21

1. Address JB's comment on international perspective #8

Please review changes suggested in pull request #8.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 3
Accept pull request with the following changes 2
Leave open for more discussion

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Address JB's comment on international perspective #8Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick Accept pull request as proposed
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes rewrite at https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/8#issuecomment-181540462
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Accept pull request with the following changes added a bit about legal definition to Shawn's https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/8#issuecomment-181540462

https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/8#issuecomment-181921644
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

2. Change to focus on ICT more broadly #9

Please review changes suggested in pull request #9.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 3
Accept pull request with the following changes 2
Leave open for more discussion

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Change to focus on ICT more broadly #9Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick Accept pull request as proposed
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes Suggest text for first part: https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/9#issuecomment-181433963

Comments and suggestion for last part: https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/9#issuecomment-181436998
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Accept pull request with the following changes shawn's final edit https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/9#issuecomment-181577087
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

3. Change to scope and definition #10

Please review changes suggested in pull request #10.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 1
Accept pull request with the following changes 4
Leave open for more discussion

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Change to scope and definition #10Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick Accept pull request with the following changes Make --> makes
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes comments and tweak suggestion: https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/10#issuecomment-181423618
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Accept pull request with the following changes +1 to Shawn's edit https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/10#issuecomment-181939436
Alan Smith Accept pull request with the following changes Should "make" be "makes" in this sentence: Bright light make ?

4. Scope and specificity #16

Please review changes suggested in pull request #16.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 3
Accept pull request with the following changes 1
Leave open for more discussion

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Scope and specificity #16Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick Accept pull request as proposed
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes comments & suggested tweak: https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/16#issuecomment-181471268
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

5. Update requirements.html #18

Please review changes suggested in pull request #18.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 5
Accept pull request with the following changes 1
Leave open for more discussion

Details

Responder Update requirements.html #18Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick Accept pull request as proposed
Jonathan Avila Accept pull request as proposed
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/18#issuecomment-181484330
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Accept pull request as proposed
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

6. Separate color from contrast #15

Please review changes suggested in pull request #15.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 3
Accept pull request with the following changes 1
Leave open for more discussion

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Separate color from contrast #15Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request with the following changes https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-a11y-tf/pull/15#issuecomment-181607639
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Accept pull request as proposed
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

7. Factual Correction #17

Please review changes suggested in pull request #17.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 2
Accept pull request with the following changes
Leave open for more discussion 2

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Factual Correction #17Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Leave open for more discussion I think this needs tweaking.
Laura Carlson Leave open for more discussion In the sentence, "All people, both with normal and low vision, require larger print for text to be legible as compared to being simply visible", I'm not sure if we want to use the word "normal" to refer to people who do not have a disability as it can tend to infer that people with disabilities are not "normal".

So instead of "All people, both with normal and low vision" would one of the following work?

1. "People without vision loss and people with low vision"

2. "Everyone including people with 20/20 vision"

3. "Everyone including people with no vision loss"

4. "Everyone including people with perfect visual acuity"

5. "All people"
Jim Allan Accept pull request as proposed
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

8. User Needs - specific settings #21

Please review changes suggested in pull request #21.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accept pull request as proposed 3
Accept pull request with the following changes
Leave open for more discussion 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder User Needs - specific settings #21Comments
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Jonathan Avila
Shawn Lawton Henry Accept pull request as proposed
Laura Carlson Accept pull request as proposed
Jim Allan Leave open for more discussion
Alan Smith Accept pull request as proposed

More details on responses

  • Andrew Kirkpatrick: last responded on 8, February 2016 at 14:08 (UTC)
  • Jonathan Avila: last responded on 8, February 2016 at 14:36 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 9, February 2016 at 13:44 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 9, February 2016 at 20:43 (UTC)
  • Jim Allan: last responded on 10, February 2016 at 15:03 (UTC)
  • Alan Smith: last responded on 10, February 2016 at 15:18 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. Bruce Bailey
  3. Alastair Campbell
  4. John Rochford
  5. Scott McCormack
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire