A small change was made to the "Answer to issue 2" part of the proposed answer for Issue 257 which is noted by a comment from Mary Jo. Review the Proposed TF answer to Issue 257.

Indicate whether this issue answer is sufficient. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in the Google doc.

For reference, here is a link to Issue 257: Clarity on testing 1.4.10 Reflow on mobile devices.

Summary

Details

The previous survey (that was due on 8 May) had a review the Proposed TF answer to Issue 221.

That survey had 5 answers - 4 answered it was sufficient as-is, and one had a "something else" answer but no proposed changes. There have been no further proposed changes, so once again, please indicate whether the proposed answer is sufficient as-is. If edits are needed, provide the detailed edits in the survey or in the Google doc.

For reference, here is a link to Issue 221: 1.4.10 Reflow applied to self-service terminals/kiosks.

Summary

Details

Point 6 which is one of the topics raised in Issue 4 described as: We've long held that PC magnifier programs are assistive technology and therefore not a method of meeting 1.4.4 Resize Text. Is the same true on other platforms?

Based on last week's discussion and survey results regarding Point 6, please review the new proposed response Option 5: Sam's proposal.

For reference, here are links to background information:

• Google doc - description of Point 6
• survey results on previously proposed answers
• 9 May discussion on survey results

Indicate whether proposal 5's answer is sufficient to address the concern. If edits are needed, provide detailed edits in the survey or in the Google doc.

Summary

Details