W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG2ICT-Review of SC 3.2.6 Consistent Help updated draft

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com

This questionnaire was open from 2024-01-05 to 2024-01-10.

7 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Review of updated proposal for 3.2.6 Consistent Help
Review added note (Note 3)

1. Review of updated proposal for 3.2.6 Consistent Help

Review the updated draft proposal for Applying SC 3.2.6 Consistent Help to Non-Web Documents and Software. Indicate whether this proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft and note any desired changes.

For reference, the proposal was updated based on the previous review of the first draft. See the survey results for those comments.

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.	7
The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, with the following changes.
The proposal isn't ready yet.

Details

Responder	Review of updated proposal for 3.2.6 Consistent Help	Comments
Phil Day	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Thorsten Katzmann	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.	Good work!
Mike Pluke	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.
Bruce Bailey	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.	Small typo: ...they occur in the same order relative to other (content] Left parenthesis should be left bracket.
Fernanda Bonnin	The updated proposal is ready to incorporate into the editor's draft, as-is.

2. Review added note (Note 3)

The previous survey results for the question regarding notes indicated no further notes are needed (Mitch's suggestion was incorporated into the word substitutions). However, as the pull request was created, it was noted that "set of" terms were used. Want to call special attention to the newly proposed Note 3 in the draft proposal for Applying SC 3.2.6 Consistent Help to Non-Web Documents and Software. This note refers the reader to the definitions of these key terms, which is consistent with other SC guidance where "set of" terms are used.

Review the newly proposed Note 3 regarding "sets of non-web documents" and "sets of software programs" which is consistently applied within other SC guidance that uses these terms (e.g 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks). Do you agree with adding this note? Are any further changes needed? If you feel there are additional notes needed, make your proposal in the entry field.

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Include Note 3, as-is.	6
Include Note 3, with edits.	1
Include Note 3 as-is and other notes are needed, provide your proposal.
Do not include Note 3.

Details

Responder	Review added note (Note 3)	Comments
Phil Day	Include Note 3, as-is.
Thorsten Katzmann	Include Note 3, as-is.
Loïc Martínez Normand	Include Note 3, as-is.	I agree. This note is important in any success criterion that refers to "sets of non-web documents" and "sets of software programs".
Mike Pluke	Include Note 3, as-is.
Mary Jo Mueller	Include Note 3, as-is.
Bruce Bailey	Include Note 3, with edits.	Small editorial: I would rather "collection of software" rather than "pieces of software" Also https://deploy-preview-292--wcag2ict.netlify.app/#set-of-software-programs defined term is missing a left bracket: collection of software programs] that... Should be: collection of [software programs] that...
Fernanda Bonnin	Include Note 3, as-is.