w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-01-19 to 2018-01-30.
21 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
summary | by responder | by choice
Please thoroughly review this revision, and indicate your comments and position on publication.
Note: We have made changes as comments came in. All changes since the opening of this survey are documented here: Changes since 18 January (wiki), so you can review them without having to go over the entire document.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I approve publication. I have no comments. | 11 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion. | 8 |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Intro to Accessibility Revision | Comments |
---|---|---|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Very nice - well done. |
Laura Keen |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
Looks good! Issue is editor's discretion about Page Contents. |
Jes Pulido |
|
|
Stéphane Deschamps |
|
|
Chris O'Brien |
|
Nice work, everyone. |
Judy Brewer | Please ping me during meeting discussion if you'd like to discuss my comments at: https://github.com/w3c/wai-intro-accessibility/issues/20 None of the checkboxes above exactly match the intent of my vote. I could be convinced to a different point of view through discussion, and am not a regular part of the approval process, but this seems like an important resource and I have a strong concern on this that I hope can be addressed. Thanks. | |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Matthew Putland |
|
|
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Vivienne Conway |
|
|
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
|
Andrew Arch |
|
Looking excellent - just a couple of suggestions: 1. the link to the 7-min video (Web Accessibility Perspectives Video) might be better as a link to the perspectives landing page so people can dip in and out of the different shorter videos? 2. consider "Web accessibility is required by law in some countries" (rather than "... in some cases") |
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Eric Eggert |
|
See GitHub pull request, comments |
Robert Jolly |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
[Editor] |
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
This document is absolutely great, and I'm very happy with it. The following suggestions are totally for Editors' discretion: Is the "Introduction" section really necessary? It seems to merely repeat what is in the immediately following section "Accessibility in Context". Also, if the "Introduction" section is removed, do we need the *heading* "Accessibility in Context"? Might be nice to dive right into the content - seems more engaging. |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I approve publication. I have no comments. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion. |
|
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.