W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 13 January 2017

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2017-01-13 to 2017-01-18.

13 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 13 January 2017
  2. Review & approve Carousels Tutorial **by Tuesday (January 17, 2017)**
  3. Easy Checks Comments
  4. Sorting vs filtering
  5. Policy page mock-up
  6. Data gathering form for policy pages
  7. Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?

1. Resolutions of 13 January 2017

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 13 January 2017 EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The  summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2017 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. 7
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 5
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolutions of 13 January 2017Comments
Adina Halter
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Sylvie Duchateau
Caleb Watson
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Howard Kramer
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
James Green
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
  • Caleb Watson
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Eric Eggert
  • Brent Bakken
  • Susan Hewitt
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Adina Halter
  • Andrew Arch
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Howard Kramer
  • James Green
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Review & approve Carousels Tutorial **by Tuesday (January 17, 2017)**

summary | by responder | by choice

Please take the time to review and complete the approval survey for the Carousels Tutorial by Tuesday (January 17, 2017).

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it and completed the survey. 11
[option of last resort, to be used infrequently] I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Review & approve Carousels Tutorial **by Tuesday (January 17, 2017)**Comments
Adina Halter
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Andrew Arch
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Caleb Watson
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Laura Keen
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Sharron Rush
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • [option of last resort, to be used infrequently] I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
 I'll avoid nitpicking this and let others in EOWG handle thorough review! :-)
Eric Eggert
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
 [Editor]
Howard Kramer
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
 Note: I made a number of comments and edits in Github but I guess I was past the deadline - couldn't submit the survey.
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
James Green
  • I reviewed it and completed the survey.
Susan Hewitt
  • [option of last resort, to be used infrequently] I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
 I'm sorry. I have a very intense deadline this week and missed the review period.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed it and completed the survey.
  • Adina Halter
  • Andrew Arch
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Caleb Watson
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Eric Eggert
  • Howard Kramer
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
[option of last resort, to be used infrequently] I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Susan Hewitt

3. Easy Checks Comments

summary | by responder | by choice

Easy Checks update was published in December! Yeah! We received some comments, and discussed them in the 13 Jan telecon.

These comments are updated since the 13 Jan telecon. Please add your suggestions, or +1, or other, to these 2 GitHub issues:

These comments were addressed in the 13 Jan telecon, and resolutions passed. If you have additional input, feel free to re-open them if needed:

Please indicate:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion. 11
I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I would like to review any changes.
I didn't get to it yet; I will review these by the date in the Comments field.
I can't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Easy Checks CommentsComments
Adina Halter
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Andrew Arch
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
 re the Resize text check, can we say anything about page that don't 'pinch-zoom' on mobile devices? Maybe record in backlog for next review?
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I can't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
Caleb Watson
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Laura Keen
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Sharron Rush
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Eric Eggert
  • I can't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
Howard Kramer
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
Brent Bakken
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
James Green
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
 +1 to Shawn's wording on contrast.
+1 it's a better fit for tips.
Susan Hewitt
  • I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I approve these changes, with any minor tweaks for editor's discretion.
  • Adina Halter
  • Andrew Arch
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Caleb Watson
  • Laura Keen
  • Sharron Rush
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
I commented in GitHub (or the comments below) and I would like to review any changes.
I didn't get to it yet; I will review these by the date in the Comments field.
I can't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Eric Eggert

4. Sorting vs filtering

summary | by responder | by choice

Consider the idea of sorting vs filtering the collected data. There is an option to create an HTML table that is sortable by category. The HTML policy table prototype is on GitHub. Another idea is to create the ability to set filters that will manage the information presentation. Please consider these two options and discuss your preference and the rationale.

There was brief discussion about sorting vs. filtering during the teleconference.

Comments can be submitted via GitHub issue #13 (preferred) or in the space below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have considered and put comments in GitHub. 6
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below. 2
I have considered and have no preference. 3
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group. 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Sorting vs filteringComments
Adina Halter
  • I have considered and have no preference.
Andrew Arch
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
 I reviewed and comments via email before seeing the survey
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2017JanMar/0015.html
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
Caleb Watson
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
 I like both approaches so I will go with Editor’s discretion as long as it is easy to find which countries have actual laws versus something else and be able to get more info about it then it will serve its purpose.
Laura Keen
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sharron Rush
  • I have considered and have no preference.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Eric Eggert
Howard Kramer
  • I have considered and have no preference.
 I don't have a strong opinion either way. A sortable table by column header would seem sufficient and less work.
Brent Bakken
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
James Green
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
 i'd like both sorting and filtering since it's not a lot of work to offer both.
Susan Hewitt
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Caleb Watson
I have considered and have no preference.
  • Adina Halter
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
  • Sylvie Duchateau

5. Policy page mock-up

summary | by responder | by choice

Please review the mock-up sent in Mary Jo's email (the document title is Policy_page_proposal_13_Jan_2016.docx). Consider the level of information per country and the approach presented here.

Comments can be submitted via GitHub Issue #14 (Preferred) or in the space below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have considered and put comments in GitHub. 4
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below. 4
I have considered and have no comments to add.
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below. 2
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group. 3

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Policy page mock-upComments
Adina Halter
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
Andrew Arch
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
 I reviewed and comments via email before seeing the survey
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2017JanMar/0015.html
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
Caleb Watson
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
 Make sure the Status is clear and in the detailed section as well. It should be very easy (at a glance) to find which countries have actual laws versus something else and to what level of WCAG it is.
Laura Keen
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sharron Rush
  • I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
 By Thursday 1/19
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
  • I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
 I looked at it. There are a lot of issues and questions in the comments. I spent all my time on the form. I'm happy to talk through some issues in the teleconference, if that's most efficient. I'll try to get through it all by Wed 25 Jan.
Eric Eggert
Howard Kramer
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
Brent Bakken
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
James Green
  • I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
 in the interest of being brief, I would cut the first for 4 sections (disclaimer, status and updates, intro, terms...) and maybe take one or 2 sentences total from them and add to the Table section. I think the table should be front and center... the specific details can be left at the bottom and linked to throughout the table. if disclaimers or whatever are necessary, i would put them at the bottom, if we must mention them up front, then just link to them.
Susan Hewitt
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Brent Bakken
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Caleb Watson
  • Howard Kramer
  • James Green
I have considered and have no comments to add.
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
  • Sharron Rush
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
  • Adina Halter
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Susan Hewitt

6. Data gathering form for policy pages

summary | by responder | by choice

Finally, consider the questions (data input fields) proposed for the policy data collection form (the document title is Policy_update_form.docx). Are these the right questions and format (types of fields) to collect this data?

Comments can be submitted via GitHub Issue #15 (preferred) or in the space below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have considered and put comments in GitHub. 4
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here. 4
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below. 1
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group. 3

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Data gathering form for policy pagesComments
Adina Halter
  • I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here.
Andrew Arch I reviewed and comments via email before seeing the survey
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2017JanMar/0015.html
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
Caleb Watson
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
Laura Keen
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
Sharron Rush
  • I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
  • I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-policieslist/issues/15#issuecomment-273356657

(I did this first -- partly because it was easier ;-) and partly thinking we might want to prioritize the form so we can get started getting data in the database while we refine the main page...)
Eric Eggert
Howard Kramer
  • I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here.
Brent Bakken
  • I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
James Green
  • I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here.
Susan Hewitt
  • I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have considered and put comments in GitHub.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Brent Bakken
I have considered and put my comments in the comment box below.
I have considered and approve the form as it is presented here.
  • Adina Halter
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
  • James Green
I have not had time to consider but will do so by the date in the box below.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I do not have time for this review and will go with the decision of the group.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Caleb Watson
  • Susan Hewitt

7. Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?

Please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to team-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.

Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:

Thursday - 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
WebEx Link or Audio connection: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number, Meeting number: 314 241 816 Passcode: (same as main EOWG teleconference)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 1
no 10

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?Comments
Adina Halter no
Andrew Arch no
Shadi Abou-Zahra no
Sylvie Duchateau
Caleb Watson no
Laura Keen no
Sharron Rush no
Shawn Lawton Henry no
Eric Eggert
Howard Kramer yes Template for Accessibility Evaluation Reports - https://w3c.github.io/wai-eval-report-templates/.
Updated references to WCAG version and updated the intro.
Brent Bakken no
James Green no
Susan Hewitt no

More details on responses

  • Adina Halter: last responded on 15, January 2017 at 21:06 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 16, January 2017 at 02:30 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 16, January 2017 at 18:01 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 17, January 2017 at 10:51 (UTC)
  • Caleb Watson: last responded on 17, January 2017 at 16:38 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 17, January 2017 at 18:50 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 17, January 2017 at 21:26 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 18, January 2017 at 01:42 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 18, January 2017 at 08:14 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 18, January 2017 at 21:28 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 18, January 2017 at 21:58 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 19, January 2017 at 00:08 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 19, January 2017 at 02:00 (UTC)

Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.