W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 10 June 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-06-10 to 2016-06-16.

10 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. 10 June Minutes
  2. Contributions to the WAI web site redesign
  3. Add to the redesign team?
  4. Resource Development Life Cycle
  5. Resource Management - Current status of my assigned resources
  6. Resource Management - Do you want to bring any items for discussion to the next meeting?

1. 10 June Minutes

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 10 June EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the meeting as recorded. There were no resolutions. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate, 7
I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions. 3
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns or questions explained below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder 10 June MinutesComments
Laura Keen
  • I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions.
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
Caleb Watson
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions.
 I was in the meeting. I just skimmed the minutes, not read them in detail.
Howard Kramer
  • I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions.
Andrew Arch
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate,
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Caleb Watson
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes and have no questions.
  • Laura Keen
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns or questions explained below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Contributions to the WAI web site redesign

summary | by responder | by choice

In addition to working on your resources, what tasks are you most interested in helping with for the redesign? This is not a firm commitment; it's like saying you're willing to be on the bench for when the time comes. Some possibilities are included below and feel free to improvise in the open text box.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Analytics analysis 6
Brainstorming 7
Information Architecture 2
Programming/development 3
UX research 4
Visual design 2
Wireframing 3
Other (listed below) 5
I will do my resource management tasks, but not able to commit beyond that

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Contributions to the WAI web site redesignComments
Laura Keen
  • Programming/development
Eric Eggert
  • Analytics analysis
  • Programming/development
  • UX research
  • Visual design
  • Wireframing
  • Other (listed below)
 I’m happy to dip my toes in everything I’m needed to look at, mainly technical stuff :)
Sharron Rush
  • Analytics analysis
  • Brainstorming
  • UX research
  • Other (listed below)
 Provide review and feedback at all stages, general project support as needed.
Susan Hewitt
  • Other (listed below)
 I've already answered this in the wiki: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_Site_Redesign_Notes#Leadership
Caleb Watson
  • Analytics analysis
  • Brainstorming
  • Programming/development
  • Wireframing
  • Other (listed below)
 I want to make myself available to James and Anna Belle on this resource - please reach out to see how I can make the best contribution.
James Green
  • Analytics analysis
  • Brainstorming
Brent Bakken
  • Analytics analysis
  • Brainstorming
  • Visual design
  • Other (listed below)
 User testing, User feedback
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Analytics analysis
  • Brainstorming
  • Information Architecture
  • UX research
  • Wireframing
Howard Kramer
  • Brainstorming
Andrew Arch
  • Brainstorming
  • Information Architecture
  • UX research

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Analytics analysis
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Caleb Watson
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
Brainstorming
  • Sharron Rush
  • Caleb Watson
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer
  • Andrew Arch
Information Architecture
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Andrew Arch
Programming/development
  • Laura Keen
  • Eric Eggert
  • Caleb Watson
UX research
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Andrew Arch
Visual design
  • Eric Eggert
  • Brent Bakken
Wireframing
  • Eric Eggert
  • Caleb Watson
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
Other (listed below)
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Caleb Watson
  • Brent Bakken
I will do my resource management tasks, but not able to commit beyond that

3. Add to the redesign team?

Do you want to suggest others who do not currently participate in EO but might be willing to be on the bench for some of these tasks? If you do, check Yes and include in the comment box how Task Force Facilitators James and Anna Belle should follow up with you.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 5
no 4

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Add to the redesign team?Comments
Laura Keen no
Eric Eggert no
Sharron Rush yes Elle Waters volunteered design resources from Simply Accessible
Susan Hewitt yes I only put yes because there's no maybe box . I would like to but I need to think of some possibilities.
Caleb Watson yes Noah Watson (UI Engineer)
Justin Cox (Designer)
I will try to brainstorm some more folks as well.

Contact me to get in touch with each of these folks.
James Green yes Charlotte Wise - IA
Brent Bakken no
Shawn Lawton Henry
Howard Kramer no
Andrew Arch yes check in with me via email and I'll provide details / introductions as appropriate

4. Resource Development Life Cycle

The completed draft of the Resource Development Life Cycle (RDLC) is ready for review and approval. Please take time to give a thorough review of the RDLC and provide your feedback below.

Important Note: Each of the six stages have a sub-page that can be accessed by the link in the table column headings. These pages are not meant to be complete at this time. While Resource Managers start to use this RDLC site, examples, tips, and other helpful bits will be added by everyone to these sub-pages. The pages are meant to be dynamic and updated with helpful ideas and templates.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is. 7
I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for Chair, Staff and Editor's discretion. 2
I do not accept the Resource Development Life Cycle unless the comments in the Comments section below are addressed. 1
I abstain.

Details

Responder Resource Development Life CycleComments
Laura Keen I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.
Eric Eggert I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.
Sharron Rush I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.
Susan Hewitt I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for Chair, Staff and Editor's discretion. "Resource backlog" under Deliverables for stage 1 and "Plan" as the task for stage 2 need to be more clearly defined.

I may just not know what resource backlog is but what exactly is being planned in step 2? Are we scoping the entire document in terms of timeline, roles, etc?
Caleb Watson I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is. It would be great if people who have already created the artifacts required for each phase to create and attach template documents to each stage.
James Green I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.
Brent Bakken I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for Chair, Staff and Editor's discretion. RDLC looks good.

On the Sub-pages there needs to be some updating to the section that says and links to the next stage. Some have not been updated from previous RDLC draft. Not an issue for approving RDLC main page.
Shawn Lawton Henry I do not accept the Resource Development Life Cycle unless the comments in the Comments section below are addressed. Comment key:
* [suggested] below is "I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for Chair, Staff and Editor's discretion."
* [required] below is "I do not accept the Resource Development Life Cycle unless the comments in the Comments section below are addressed."
---

[required] Under Stage 1, I don't know what is "Resource Backlog"? Maybe "EOWG Resource Management Tool"? Even if so, I don't understand why it's a deliverable of this stage – and it's not listed in the sub-page at all.

[suggested] Not a big deal, but I don't think the Outreach Plan needs to be completed in Stage 2. Good to get it started early; however, don't really need it done until Stage 4. It might actually be better to wait until the resource is better developed to put too much effort into an Outreach Plan – because resources tend to morph after early drafts, and that might impact the Outreach Plan.

[required] "Develop Internal Draft(s)" -> "Develop Drafts" or "Develop WG Drafts" or "Iterate drafts" or such ("Internal" could be mis-read as not public)

[strongly suggested :-] I think it would be good to make it clearer that Stage 5 includes: publishing a first version, addressing public comments, getting EOWG approval to publish updated version, and publishing the updated version.

[suggested] In the Maintenance stage, the options for results from a resource review are "(*Maintain, Update, or Retire?)". "Maintain" seems active, but I think this options is really "Leave as it" - yes? It might be clearer if called something other than Maintain. Totally a minor issue, though, so fine if others want to leave it as is.

---sub-pages---

[fix] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Stage_4._Draft says "EO Decision: Move to Concept Stage" but I think it should be move to Publication Stage.

[fix] In https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Stage_5._Publication I don't know what "Updated Backlog" is? Maybe "EOWG Resource Management Tool"?

[required] https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Stage_6._Maintenance "which are the 3 choices a resource manager can choose from when conducting the annual review of each resource." -> "which are the 3 choices a resource manager can suggest when conducting the annual review of each resource."
Howard Kramer I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.
Andrew Arch I accept the Resource Development Life Cycle as it is.

5. Resource Management - Current status of my assigned resources

summary | by responder | by choice

The Resource Management Tool, our internal resource overview list, is now in a workable state.

During the teleconference, Eric gave an overview of the page and a quick demonstration of how to edit content for listed resources and how to add new resources. If after testing out the tool you need further assistance, please reach out to Eric or Brent to set up a time for instruction.

Note: Not all resources are listed in the tool yet (still gathering the information), but you can edit the ones which are present and you can add files for new resources.

The previous listing of Resources with indication of Resource Manager is WAI Pages.

To edit, click the "Edit" link underneath every resource title. To add, use the form on the page to create a new file with placeholders that should help you fill out the file. A minimal amount of form documentation is available.

Important: If you get a notice that you need to fork the repository to edit, send Eric an email with your GitHub user name to get direct write access.

Question: How are you coming with your assigned resources? Indicate with a selection below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below. 5
I have completed my review and I am starting to use the new Resource Management Tool to provide status and updates. 2
I'm working on it. I expect to complete my review of my assigned resources and enter status in the new tool by the date in the comment section below. 2
I am having trouble understanding or completing my task and would like some help.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resource Management - Current status of my assigned resourcesComments
Laura Keen
Eric Eggert
  • I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
 End of July
Sharron Rush
  • I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
 Friday, 17 Jun
Susan Hewitt
  • I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
 By this Friday or Monday at the latest.
Caleb Watson
  • I have completed my review and I am starting to use the new Resource Management Tool to provide status and updates.
 I am not currently a resource manager but have indicated my interest in the redesign resource as a contributor.
James Green
  • I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
 June 30
Brent Bakken
  • I'm working on it. I expect to complete my review of my assigned resources and enter status in the new tool by the date in the comment section below.
 23 June, 2016
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have completed my review and I am starting to use the new Resource Management Tool to provide status and updates.
 I love the tool! I put all my resources into it.
Howard Kramer
  • I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
 6/22/16
Andrew Arch
  • I'm working on it. I expect to complete my review of my assigned resources and enter status in the new tool by the date in the comment section below.
 next week (before annual holiday)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I had already completed the review and entered recommendations in the Resource Documentation Survey. I will transfer my status update to the new Resource Management Tool by the date in the comment section below.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Susan Hewitt
  • James Green
  • Howard Kramer
I have completed my review and I am starting to use the new Resource Management Tool to provide status and updates.
  • Caleb Watson
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I'm working on it. I expect to complete my review of my assigned resources and enter status in the new tool by the date in the comment section below.
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
I am having trouble understanding or completing my task and would like some help.

6. Resource Management - Do you want to bring any items for discussion to the next meeting?

Please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Also note how much time you think you need.

If you would like to discuss your resource and ideas for next steps with Chairs and W3C Staff, please indicate in the comment field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 1
no 8

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Resource Management - Do you want to bring any items for discussion to the next meeting?Comments
Laura Keen no
Eric Eggert no [out of office for the meeting]
Sharron Rush yes Disposition of 3 general intro to Accessibility documents.
Susan Hewitt no I'm a tentative yes because a. although it is in my queue right now I'm unsure if I'll have the RA finished by Friday morning. And I need to know what resource backlog is.

It is my goal to have that doc completed this week.
Caleb Watson no
James Green no
Brent Bakken no
Shawn Lawton Henry no
Howard Kramer no
Andrew Arch

More details on responses

  • Laura Keen: last responded on 13, June 2016 at 18:18 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 14, June 2016 at 09:22 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 14, June 2016 at 17:22 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 14, June 2016 at 19:43 (UTC)
  • Caleb Watson: last responded on 14, June 2016 at 21:34 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 14, June 2016 at 23:00 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 15, June 2016 at 21:12 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 15, June 2016 at 22:05 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 16, June 2016 at 04:05 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 16, June 2016 at 12:24 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Sarah Pulis
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Jade Matos Carew
  25. Sonsoles López Pernas
  26. Greta Krafsig
  27. Jayne Schurick
  28. Michele Williams
  29. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  30. Brian Elton
  31. Julianna Rowsell
  32. Tabitha Mahoney
  33. Fred Edora
  34. Rabab Gomaa
  35. Marcelo Paiva
  36. Eloisa Guerrero
  37. Leonard Beasley
  38. Frankie Wolf
  39. Supriya Makude
  40. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  41. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.