W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire WCAG 3.0 Weekly Responses Survey

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2021-04-15 to 2021-04-20.

14 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Weekly Responses

1. Weekly Responses

This survey covers a list of simple and (hopefully) non controversial responses to various issued logged for the WCAG 3.0 First Public Working Draft.

Please review the draft responses for the issues available from the following link: WCAG 3.0 Weekly Responses

Either note your agreement with all responses, or choose "something else" and note in comments the specific issues that you do not agree with along with your concerns or recommended changes.

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Agree with the responses	13
Something else (please note in comments the issues and the concerns or recommended changes)	1

Details

Responder	Weekly Responses	Comments
Peter Korn	Agree with the responses
Jennifer Strickland	Agree with the responses
Gundula Niemann	Agree with the responses
Ben Tillyer	Agree with the responses
Rachael Bradley Montgomery	Agree with the responses	Including Alastair's suggested addition on ITI Comments on First Public Working Draft of W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0
Rain Breaw Michaels	Something else (please note in comments the issues and the concerns or recommended changes)	For #458, agree with the response with Alastair's addition. For the two from SiteImprove, the responses are good, but they feel like they lack a commitment to followup. Is it possible to add a statement similar to the one Alastair has added to #458 to these two comments, that lets SiteImprove know how these issues will be tracked and followed up on?
Jake Abma	Agree with the responses
Michael Gower	Agree with the responses
Laura Carlson	Agree with the responses
Jeanne F Spellman	Agree with the responses	510: I agree with the answer. I think we need to research the Site Improve comment #510 that the titles are unprofessional in the EU. I recommend that we flag this issue for further followup such as approaching the appropriate regulators to ask if the names Bronze Silver Gold would be considered unprofessional. Is the Leeds Green Building model accepted in the EU and does it have different names? 507: IMO I don't think we are ready to answer this yet. I think we need to look more deeply at this concern at the 29 April meeting. I recommend removing this issue from In survey and re-assign it to editors. 495: agree 458: agreed with Alastair's suggestion in the Issue.
Bruce Bailey	Agree with the responses	@Jeanne, I was also surprised by #510. The Bronze/Silver/Gold analog was, of course, chosen to help with internationalization (as compared to A/AA/AAA). Are the Olympics "unprofessional"? We have active working group members from Site Improve, so I am looking forward to the live conversations about this.
John Kirkwood	Agree with the responses
Kim Dirks	Agree with the responses
Andrew Kirkpatrick	Agree with the responses