W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Update to rule writing & publication process

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2021-03-25 to 2021-03-30.

9 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. About this Review
  2. ACT Publication steps
  3. Public feedback
  4. Anual Review
  5. Other comments

1. About this Review

Please take time to review the updated ACT Publication Process. Did you:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it thoroughly. 3
I skimmed it. 4
I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. 2

Details

Responder About this ReviewComment
Mary Jo Mueller I reviewed it thoroughly.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I reviewed it thoroughly.
Sarah Horton I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group.
Michael Gower I didn't get to it. I abstain (not vote). Accept the decision of the group. Mary Jo reviewed this material on behalf of IBM.
Michael Cooper I reviewed it thoroughly. "the author is free to merge the pull request" - change to "an editor can merge the pull request" - I think the practice of allowing merges into the main branch should restricted to a few people with elevated access, as is becoming a norm in many W3C repositories.
Alastair Campbell I skimmed it. From the changes, I concluded that:
- Creating rules is becoming a more shared, wider thing between TF & CG (and possibly anyone can create a proposal/draft?).
- Refining the (partly github) workflow for creating new rules.
- Adds call for implementation.
- Adds annual review
John Foliot I skimmed it.
Gundula Niemann I skimmed it. I reviewed the first half thoroughly.
Laura Carlson I skimmed it.

2. ACT Publication steps

Please review the update to the ACT rule publication process section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 3
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 3
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder ACT Publication stepsComments
Mary Jo Mueller I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. Simply editorial changes. I added comments to the PR.
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The new text refers people not in the taskforce to speak to the facilitators. I expected a light process of what happens after that to be included since these individuals were addressed in the previous version.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. The timeframe for the review should depend on the impact of the change, which is not identical to the number of rules affected.
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

3. Public feedback

Please review the update to the Public Feedback section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below.
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Public feedbackComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

4. Anual Review

Please review the update to the Annual Review section. Do you have any suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 5
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Anual ReviewComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery Looks good, no changes to suggest
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper This looks like the same content as the previous question, formatted differently. I did not look closely for diffs.

Note annual review is a commitment that can be difficult to keep. Does the TF / CG have a plan to ensure it can deliver on this, especially as the ruleset grows?
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. It's merely a question:
Does the liaison decide on his/her own whether or not needs to be updated?
I feel this is not symmetric to that a proposed change needs to be approved by three independent reviewers to go to the next step.
Shouldn't the decision that no change is needed also be approved?
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

5. Other comments

Do you have any other comments or suggested changes you want to see?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks good, no changes to suggest 4
I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. 1
I have a strong suggestion and do not approve the section without this change, entered below

(4 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Other commentsComments
Mary Jo Mueller Looks good, no changes to suggest
Rachael Bradley Montgomery I have a suggestion for editor's discretion entered below. I am slightly concerned that there is no process to move to consensus over an objection. While this is needed only very rarely and should be used extremely sparingly I think it is an important part of the consensus process that isn't built in here.
Sarah Horton
Michael Gower
Michael Cooper
Alastair Campbell Looks good, no changes to suggest
John Foliot Looks good, no changes to suggest
Gundula Niemann
Laura Carlson Looks good, no changes to suggest

More details on responses

  • Mary Jo Mueller: last responded on 29, March 2021 at 18:39 (UTC)
  • Rachael Bradley Montgomery: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 10:53 (UTC)
  • Sarah Horton: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 12:49 (UTC)
  • Michael Gower: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 13:24 (UTC)
  • Michael Cooper: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:26 (UTC)
  • Alastair Campbell: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:42 (UTC)
  • John Foliot: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 14:53 (UTC)
  • Gundula Niemann: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:09 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 30, March 2021 at 15:10 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Chris Wilson
  3. Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
  4. Janina Sajka
  5. Shawn Lawton Henry
  6. Katie Haritos-Shea
  7. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  8. Chus Garcia
  9. Steve Faulkner
  10. Patrick Lauke
  11. David MacDonald
  12. Gez Lemon
  13. Makoto Ueki
  14. Peter Korn
  15. Preety Kumar
  16. Bruce Bailey
  17. Georgios Grigoriadis
  18. Stefan Schnabel
  19. Romain Deltour
  20. Chris Blouch
  21. Jedi Lin
  22. Jeanne F Spellman
  23. Wilco Fiers
  24. Kimberly Patch
  25. Glenda Sims
  26. Ian Pouncey
  27. Léonie Watson
  28. David Sloan
  29. John Kirkwood
  30. Detlev Fischer
  31. Reinaldo Ferraz
  32. Matt Garrish
  33. Mike Gifford
  34. Loïc Martínez Normand
  35. Mike Pluke
  36. Justine Pascalides
  37. Chris Loiselle
  38. Tzviya Siegman
  39. Jan McSorley
  40. Sailesh Panchang
  41. Cristina Mussinelli
  42. Jonathan Avila
  43. John Rochford
  44. Sujasree Kurapati
  45. Jatin Vaishnav
  46. Sam Ogami
  47. Kevin White
  48. E.A. Draffan
  49. Paul Bohman
  50. JaEun Jemma Ku
  51. 骅 杨
  52. Victoria Clark
  53. Avneesh Singh
  54. Mitchell Evan
  55. biao liu
  56. Scott McCormack
  57. Francis Storr
  58. Rick Johnson
  59. David Swallow
  60. Aparna Pasi
  61. Gregorio Pellegrino
  62. Melanie Philipp
  63. Jake Abma
  64. Nicole Windmann
  65. Oliver Keim
  66. Ruoxi Ran
  67. Wendy Reid
  68. Scott O'Hara
  69. Charles Adams
  70. Muhammad Saleem
  71. Amani Ali
  72. Trevor Bostic
  73. Jamie Herrera
  74. Shinya Takami
  75. Karen Herr
  76. Kathy Eng
  77. Cybele Sack
  78. Audrey Maniez
  79. Jennifer Delisi
  80. Arthur Soroken
  81. Daniel Bjorge
  82. Kai Recke
  83. David Fazio
  84. Daniel Montalvo
  85. Mario Chacón-Rivas
  86. Michael Gilbert
  87. Caryn Pagel
  88. Achraf Othman
  89. Helen Burge
  90. Fernanda Bonnin
  91. Jared Batterman
  92. Raja Kushalnagar
  93. Jan Williams
  94. Todd Libby
  95. Isabel Holdsworth
  96. Julia Chen
  97. Marcos Franco Murillo
  98. Yutaka Suzuki
  99. Azlan Cuttilan
  100. Jennifer Strickland
  101. Joe Humbert
  102. Ben Tillyer
  103. Charu Pandhi
  104. Poornima Badhan Subramanian
  105. Alain Vagner
  106. Roberto Scano
  107. Rain Breaw Michaels
  108. Kun Zhang
  109. Jaunita George
  110. Regina Sanchez
  111. Shawn Thompson
  112. Thomas Brunet
  113. Kenny Dunsin
  114. Jen Goulden
  115. Mike Beganyi
  116. Ronny Hendriks
  117. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  118. Rashmi Katakwar
  119. Julie Rawe
  120. Duff Johnson
  121. Laura Miller
  122. Will Creedle
  123. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  124. Marie Csanady
  125. Meenakshi Das
  126. Perrin Anto
  127. Rachele DiTullio
  128. Jan Jaap de Groot
  129. Rebecca Monteleone
  130. Ian Kersey
  131. Peter Bossley
  132. Anastasia Lanz
  133. Michael Keane
  134. Chiara De Martin
  135. Giacomo Petri
  136. Andrew Barakat
  137. Devanshu Chandra
  138. Xiao (Helen) Zhou
  139. Joe Lamyman
  140. Bryan Trogdon
  141. Mary Ann (MJ) Jawili
  142. 禹佳 陶
  143. 锦澄 王
  144. Stephen James
  145. Jay Mullen
  146. Thorsten Katzmann
  147. Tony Holland
  148. Kent Boucher
  149. Abbey Davis
  150. Phil Day
  151. Julia Kim
  152. Michelle Lana
  153. David Williams
  154. Mikayla Thompson
  155. Catherine Droege
  156. James Edwards
  157. Eric Hind
  158. Quintin Balsdon
  159. Mario Batušić
  160. David Cox
  161. Sazzad Mahamud
  162. Katy Brickley
  163. Kimberly Sarabia
  164. Corey Hinshaw
  165. Ashley Firth
  166. Daniel Harper-Wain
  167. Kiara Stewart
  168. DJ Chase
  169. Suji Sreerama
  170. Lori Oakley
  171. David Middleton
  172. Alyssa Priddy
  173. Young Choi
  174. Nichole Bui
  175. Julie Romanowski
  176. Eloisa Guerrero
  177. Daniel Henderson-Ede
  178. George Kuan
  179. YAPING LIN
  180. Justin Wilson
  181. Leonard Beasley
  182. Tiffany Burtin
  183. Shane Dittmar
  184. Nayan Padrai
  185. Niamh Kelly
  186. Matt Argomaniz Matthew Argomaniz
  187. Frankie Wolf
  188. Kimberly McGee
  189. Ahson Rana
  190. Carolina Crespo
  191. humor927 humor927
  192. Samantha McDaniel
  193. Matthäus Rojek
  194. Phong Tony Le
  195. Bram Janssens
  196. Graham Ritchie
  197. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  198. Jeroen Hulscher
  199. Alina Vayntrub
  200. Marco Sabidussi
  201. John Toles
  202. Jeanne Erickson Cooley
  203. Theo Hale
  204. Gert-Jan Vercauteren
  205. Karla Rubiano
  206. Aashutosh K
  207. Hidde de Vries
  208. Julian Kittelson-Aldred
  209. Roland Buss
  210. Aditya Surendranath
  211. Avon Kuo
  212. Elizabeth Patrick
  213. Tj Squires
  214. Nat Tarnoff
  215. Illai Zeevi
  216. Filippo Zorzi
  217. Gleidson Ramos
  218. Mike Pedersen
  219. Rachael Yomtoob
  220. Oliver Habersetzer
  221. Irfan Mukhtar

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.