w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: maryjom@us.ibm.com
This questionnaire was open from 2023-03-30 to 2023-04-06.
2 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Review the Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 1.4.12 to Non-Web Documents and Software.
WCAG 2.1 criteria and understanding links for SC 1.4.12 Text Spacing:
Indicate if you agree with the content of the section. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | 2 |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable with the following changes. | |
I have concerns with the proposed WCAG2ICT guidance. |
Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing | Comments |
---|---|---|
Bruce Bailey | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | |
Laura Carlson | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. |
Review the Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 1.4.13 to Non-Web Documents and Software.
WCAG 2.1 criteria, understanding, and definition links:
Indicate if you agree with the content of the section. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | 2 |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable with the following changes. | |
I have concerns with the proposed WCAG2ICT guidance. |
Responder | Success Criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus | Comments |
---|---|---|
Bruce Bailey | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | |
Laura Carlson | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. |
Review the Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 2.5.2 to Non-Web Documents and Software and the definitions Guidance When Applying "down-event" to Non-Web Documents and Software and Guidance When Applying "up-event" to Non-Web Documents and Software.
WCAG 2.1 criteria, understanding, and definition links for SC 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation:
Indicate if you agree with the content of the section. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | 2 |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable with the following changes. | |
I have concerns with the proposed WCAG2ICT guidance. |
Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation | Comments |
---|---|---|
Bruce Bailey | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | |
Laura Carlson | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. |
Review the Guidance When Applying Success Criterion 2.5.3 to Non-Web Documents and Software as well as the bullet for 2.5.3 Label in Name in the Success Criteria Problematic for Closed Functionality section.
WCAG 2.1 criteria and understanding links:
Indicate if you agree with the content of the section. Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning in the comments field.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | 2 |
The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable with the following changes. | |
I have concerns with the proposed WCAG2ICT guidance. |
Responder | Success Criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name | Comments |
---|---|---|
Bruce Bailey | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. | |
Laura Carlson | The proposed WCAG2ICT guidance is acceptable as-is. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.