w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: www-archive@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2015-10-27 to 2015-10-31.
2 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Choose your preference below.
Note: User toggles will require JS and/or markup changes, which are not in scope for 2016, but could happen in the future.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required. | 2 |
Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great, but only acceptable if there's also a user toggle. | |
Side-by-side ToC is acceptable only if it's triggered by the user. | |
No side-by-side ToC, ever. |
Responder | Feedback |
---|---|
Peter Linss | Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required. |
Tab Atkins Jr. | Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required. |
If you are a specification editor, please tell us whether you can make the necessary markup change happen are a for publications in 2016.
Note: ReSpec and Bikeshed will be automatically updated.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. | 2 |
No, we cannot generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. |
Responder | 2016 deployment (optional) |
---|---|
Peter Linss | Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. |
Tab Atkins Jr. | Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. |
If you have other comments, please indicate those below.
Responder | Other comments |
---|---|
Peter Linss | |
Tab Atkins Jr. |
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.