ISSUE-2![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
What commonality should there be among W3C media types? |
2002-01-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-3![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) nsMediaType-3 |
CLOSED |
Relationship between media types and namespaces? |
2002-01-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-4![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xformsReview-4 |
CLOSED |
Request to review XForms Last Call document |
2002-01-18 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-5![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) uncefactLiaison-5 |
CLOSED |
Invitation to create liaison with UN/CEFACT ebTWGArchitecture Group |
2002-01-03 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-6![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 |
CLOSED |
Algorithm for creating a URI from a QName? |
2002-01-22 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-7![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) whenToUseGet-7 |
CLOSED |
(1) GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms(2) How to handle safe queries (New POST-like method?GET plus a body?) |
2002-01-23 |
HTML 5 review |
0 |
ISSUE-9![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) uriMediaType-9 |
CLOSED |
Why does the Web use mime types and not URIs? |
2001-12-17 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-10![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xmlSW-10 |
CLOSED |
Should next version of XML be XML 1.0 - DTDs +namespaces + xml:base + the infoset? |
2002-02-06 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-11![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) soapRPCURI-11 |
CLOSED |
What is the appropriate relationship between SOAP RPCand the Web's reliance on URIs? |
2002-02-08 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-12![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xmlAsText-12 |
CLOSED |
Do proposed changes to XML 1.1 ignore Unicodeconstraints? |
2002-02-11 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-13![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) mixedNamespaceMeaning-13 |
CLOSED |
What is the meaning of a document composed of content inmixed namespaces? |
2002-04-22 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-14![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) httpRange-14 |
CLOSED |
What is the range of the HTTP dereference function? |
2002-03-25 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-15![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) URIEquivalence-15 |
CLOSED |
When are two URI variants considered equivalent? |
2002-02-19 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-17![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) charmodReview-17 |
CLOSED |
Request to review "Character Model for theWeb" Last Call document |
2002-04-16 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-18![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) qnameAsId-18 |
CLOSED |
Is it ok to use Qnames as Identifiers? |
2002-04-19 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-19![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) formattingProperties-19 |
CLOSED |
Reuse existing formatting properties/names, coordinatenew ones |
2002-05-08 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-21![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) RFC3023Charset-21 |
CLOSED |
Do all "shoulds" of RFC 3023 section 7.1apply? |
2002-01-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-22![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) augmentedInfoset-22 |
CLOSED |
Infoset augmentation outside of PSVI? |
2002-06-12 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-23![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xlinkScope-23 |
CLOSED |
What is the scope of using XLink? |
2002-06-14 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-26![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) contentPresentation-26 |
CLOSED |
Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to theextent possible, is architecturally sound. |
2002-08-15 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-28![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) fragmentInXML-28 |
CLOSED |
Use of fragment identifiers in XML |
2002-10-31 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-29![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xmlProfiles-29 |
CLOSED |
When, whither and how to profile W3C specifications inthe XML Family |
2002-11-25 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-30![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) binaryXML-30 |
CLOSED |
Standardize a "binary XML" format? |
2002-10-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-32![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xmlIDSemantics-32 |
CLOSED |
How should the problem of identifying ID semantics inXML languages be addressed in the absence of a DTD? |
2003-01-30 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-33![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) mixedUIXMLNamespace-33 |
CLOSED |
Composability for user interface-oriented XML namespaces |
2003-02-06 |
HTML 5 review |
0 |
ISSUE-35![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) RDFinXHTML-35 |
CLOSED |
Syntax and semantics for embedding RDF in XHTML |
2003-02-06 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-36![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) siteData-36 |
CLOSED |
Web site metadata improving on robots.txt, w3c/p3p and favicon etc. |
2003-02-10 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-38![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) putMediaType-38 |
CLOSED |
Relation of HTTP PUT to GET, and whether client headersto server are authoritative |
2003-05-06 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-44![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xmlChunk-44 |
CLOSED |
Chunk of XML - Canonicalization and equality |
2004-01-12 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-46![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) xml11Names-46 |
CLOSED |
Impact of changes to XML 1.1 on other XML Specifications |
2004-05-19 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-47![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) endPointRefs-47 |
CLOSED |
WS-Addressing SOAP binding & app protocols |
2005-01-03 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-48![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) nameSpaceState-48 |
CLOSED |
Adding terms to a namespace |
2005-02-09 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-52![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) passwordsInTheClear-52 |
CLOSED |
Sending passwords in the clear |
2006-04-18 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-69![(edit)](/2002/09/wbs/icons/stock_edit2) |
CLOSED |
Https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/216 sangwhan, shall i add you to it? |
2017-11-09 |
|
0 |