This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 9764 - several bugs and comments on the draft by mike foskett
Summary: several bugs and comments on the draft by mike foskett
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 alt techniques (editor: Steven Faulkner) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: steve faulkner
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-18 10:05 UTC by steve faulkner
Modified: 2010-11-28 07:45 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description steve faulkner 2010-05-18 10:05:00 UTC
A minor amend and a "to do" for consideration:
 
Example 3.2;  Example code:
Current: <p><img src="sale.gif" alt="The BIG sale ...ends friday."></p>
The repeated period is for visual effect and conveys no actual meaning to a screen reader.
Suggested: <p><img src="sale.gif" alt="The BIG sale ends friday."></p>
 
 
 
Using an empty altattribute alt=""
If the image has no contextual meaning use an empty or null alt text.
If the image conveys the same contextual meaning as written in the content, then use the shortest description possible, to the point of being curt. Or, if the image is not specifically mentioned in the text, use an empty or null alt text.

from mike.foskett@websemantics.co.uk
Comment 1 steve faulkner 2010-11-28 07:45:52 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: rejected
Change Description: none
Rationale: the '...' do have meaning, they are an ellipsis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis) Just because screen readers do not interpret them correctly, does not mean they should not be inlcuded.

The current explanations for the use of the empty alt attribute cover the contexts you mention.