This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
A 'HTML4+RDFa' is great. But, please make some more edits of the DTD. E.g. strike this text from it: ]] Authors should use the Strict DTD when possible, but may use the Transitional DTD when support for presentation attribute and elements is required. [[ PS: To have a 'HTML5+RDFa' DTD would be even greater, see Maciej's comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0728.html
May be it would be good to make clear that this is a transitional doctype, w.r.t. content, but strict w.r.t. rendering mode.
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Removed offending text, made it clear that the DTD is Transitional wrt to content, but Strict wrt rendering mode: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/DTD/html401-rdfa11-1.dtd.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&f=h Rationale: I don't quite grok the request, but the submitter seems to know more about the nuances than I do and a change to the text doesn't seem like it would harm anything.
Satisfied.
mass-move component to LC1