This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Test cases K2-OrderbyExprWithout-22 and K2-OrderbyExprWithout-37 both order the sequence (1, 3, 2) by the value (). I'd like to ask that "1 2 3" be added as an alternative to the existing expected result of "1 3 2".
Just double checking; the part in the specification that allows the requested result is in 3.8.3 Order By and Return Clauses: 2. If stable is not specified, the order of T1 and T2 in the tuple stream is implementation-dependent. Am I right? Anyhow, alternative baselines have been added.