This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Section 4.2 of the PolicyAttachment document gives an example of a domainExpression. First, this is a non-example as it says little about the domainExpression. In fact, it says less than the example at the end of 3.4. Second, there is no reason for this example to be separated from section 3.4. SUGGESTION: Remove section 4.2. It serves no purpose.
Confirming that I would like the example in section 4.2 removed. This indeed the psuedo-schema. Here are the two psuedo-schemas: Section 3.4 <wsp:PolicyAttachment > <wsp:AppliesTo> <x:DomainExpression/> + </wsp:AppliesTo> ( <wsp:Policy></wsp:Policy> | <wsp:PolicyReference></wsp:PolicyReference> ) + <wsse:Security></wsse:Security> ? </wsp:PolicyAttachment> Section 4.2 <wsp:PolicyAttachment> <wsp:AppliesTo> <wsa:EndpointReference> </wsa:EndpointReference> </wsp:AppliesTo> ( <wsp:Policy></wsp:Policy> | <wsp:PolicyReference></wsp:PolicyReference> ) + </wsp:PolicyAttachment> The need for a better example I have added as a separate issue 3557.
On the August 9, 2006 telcon the WG agreed to close this issue by removing the example from section 4.2.
The minutes of the August 9 telcon are at http://www.w3.org/2006/08/09-ws-policy-minutes.html