This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1915 - RQ-141d: Structures changes to align with Datatypes (Requirement)
Summary: RQ-141d: Structures changes to align with Datatypes (Requirement)
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 critical
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: XML Schema WG
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-30 17:58 UTC by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Modified: 2008-03-08 15:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-08-30 17:58:47 UTC
As a followon to RQ-141 (anyAtomic), we have recognized the requirement
to align Structures and Datatypes more thoroughly.

This item (RQ-141d) refers to the whatever changes are needed in the
Structures spec to get the two specs in full alignment as regards
the definition of anySimpleType and anyAtomicType, the definition of
type validity, the XML mapping rules for simple types, etc., etc.

At its ftf meeting in August 2005, the WG asked the editors to provide
wording to resolve this requirement for considertion at our telcon
of 2 September 2005.
Comment 1 Henry S. Thompson 2005-09-05 16:04:04 UTC
I believe this is now completed, using dgs rec12-main and rec12-map, and ready 
to go to the WG for approval
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-09-07 20:07:12 UTC
Note that the paragraph reading "There must not be more than one 
member of {facets} of the same kind" depends on a separate
proposal to make the {value} of pattern set-valued.  If that
proposal (due out rsn) is not adopted, this paragraph will need
amendment.
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-12-17 01:18:56 UTC
A proposal to align parts of the structures spec more closely
with the corresponding portions of the datatypes spec was
considered in Edinburgh in September 2005 and approved as 
amended.  Further amendments were adopted on 16 December 2005.
The proposal as amended has been integrated into the 
status quo documents as of 16 December.