This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2
The accessors of the data model The accessors sometimes rely on the data type xs:anyURI, i.e. baseURI (5.2), document-uri (5.4), unparsed-entity-system-id (5.16). xs:anyURI itself in its latest version is defined in terms of IRI. I would be good if you could refer to IRI itself, in addition to anyURI. Based on Martin's review, comment [20]
(In reply to comment #0) > http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2 Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI, hopefully it will be.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2 > > Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI, > hopefully it will be. consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: approved by i18n-core-wg.
I think this should be closed per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-query-editors/2005Jun/0011.html Which says, briefly, that we'll apply a systematic change to the documents explaining why we use URI and how it relates to IRI.
consensus of the 1i8n-core-wg (telecon 21 May 2005): We regard the issue as closed. Best regards, Felix Sasaki