This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 10424 - Permit <details> to take "roles that use the aria-expanded state"
Summary: Permit <details> to take "roles that use the aria-expanded state"
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: steve faulkner
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: a11y, aria
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-08-25 01:54 UTC by Leif Halvard Silli
Modified: 2010-12-15 14:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Leif Halvard Silli 2010-08-25 01:54:18 UTC
REQUEST: clarify that <details> can take _all_ roles that use the aria-expanded state.

Bug 9623 added strong semantics to <details> by linking presence/absence of the @open attribute to the aria-expanded="true/false" state. The new spec text says:

]]
(The role can be changed as described in the next table, but is restricted to roles that use the aria-expanded state.)
[[

But the above sentence is unclear: Is it the _complete_ subset of "roles that use the aria-expanded state" that makes up the permitted roles? Or is it "the next table" that decides? The list in "the next table" anyhow permits only a subset-of-the-subset of roles that use the aria-expanded state:

]]
Role must be either form, group, navigation, note, or search
[[

Thus the table e.g. forbids <details role="img" >. Despite that role="img" _does_ use the aria-expanded state. 

It is unclear whether "the second table" simply fails to list all the roles that use the aria-expanded state. Or whether the spec simply fails to describe the principles/criteria behind the selection of permitted roles.
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-08-26 18:57:40 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Partially Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Clarified.
Comment 2 contributor 2010-08-26 18:58:18 UTC
Checked in as WHATWG revision r5361.
Check-in comment: Clarify non-normative sentence.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5360&to=5361
Comment 3 Michael Cooper 2010-12-15 14:37:10 UTC
Big triage sub-team thinks the ARIA mapping team should review and update this bug as the mappings are prepared, but no need for entire HTML A11Y TF to review. Assigning to Steve Faulkner to track.