ISSUE-123: Third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties.
Third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties.
- State:
- POSTPONED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Thomas Lowenthal
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-01
- Description:
- The point here is that if I am "the tracking company" then I should not publish my beacons while hiding under 1st party rules. In particular (for current response header proposal) I should not be allowed to publish a widget/beacon that signals "I am intended for 1st party use (and follow the corresponding rules)" while actually only being designed for 3rd party use as an embedded element.
- Related Actions Items:
- ACTION-116 on Thomas Lowenthal to Draft text prohibitng third parties from acting or representing themselves as first parties - due 2012-03-06, pending review
- Related emails:
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-09-04)
- Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- FW: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2012-09-04)
- Agenda for 5 September 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-09-04)
- Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from ifette@google.com on 2012-08-01)
- Re: agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-08-01)
- agenda for 1 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-07-31)
- ACTION-116 ISSUE-123 Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-03-07)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-01)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-01)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-01)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-03-01)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-01)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from singer@apple.com on 2012-03-01)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from jfurtsch@truste.com on 2012-02-29)
- RE: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-29)
- Third parties should not pretend to be first parties (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-29)
- tracking-ISSUE-123: Third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties. [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-01)
Related notes:
- Issue-123, third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties
STATUS: postponed while we work through party definitions
Display change log