ISSUE-27: Should we deprecate rdf:value?
Deprecate rdf:value
Should we deprecate rdf:value?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Cleanup tasks
- Raised by:
- Sandro Hawke
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-07
- Description:
- The 1999 and 2004 RDF Recommendations included a property called
"rdf:value" to support one style of n-ary modeling. Some experts
recommend avoiding using it. Should the WG align with this advice and
say rdf:value is only to be used for backward compatibility?
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF_Core_Work_Items#Data_Model_Issues
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/#rdfvalue
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27) (from danbri@google.com on 2013-12-14)
- Re: rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-12-14)
- Re: rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27) (from tom@tombaker.org on 2013-12-13)
- Re: rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-12-13)
- rdf:value in Primer? (re: ISSUE-27) (from tom@tombaker.org on 2013-12-13)
- Danbri's writeup regarding rdf:value (ISSUE-27) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-10)
- RDF-ISSUE-27 (Deprecate rdf:value): Should we deprecate rdf:value? [Cleanup tasks] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-07)
Related notes:
Resolution at Amsterdam FTF: Close ISSUE-27, not marking rdf:value as archaic, but with the understand that the modeling advice in RDF Primer will be revisited.
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-04-14#resolution_3
Display change log