ISSUE-14: Which aggregates to include
Which aggregates to include
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2009-05-07
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-18)
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-05-18)
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-17)
- Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-05-17)
- issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-16)
- Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-08)
- Summary of open issues on query. (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
- just before we start... agenda now reflecting last TC's agreements (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-11-02)
Related notes:
[LeeF]: we're talking about which aggregate functions to include in SPARQL/Query
7 May 2009, 14:57:13[LeeF]: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Aggregate
29 Sep 2009, 03:20:40[LeeF]: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE
25 May 2010, 14:20:05Display change log
