ISSUE-55 AC-WG-Meeting-Overlap |
OPEN |
AC Meetings should not be scheduled to overlap All WG meetings |
2013-11-22 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-93 joint specs |
OPEN |
What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG? |
2014-04-23 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-131 meetings and workshops |
OPEN |
Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops |
2014-09-14 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-133 TAG role |
OPEN |
Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined? |
2014-09-14 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-141 Errata |
OPEN |
Improve Errata management in W3C |
2014-09-18 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-142 AB role/structure |
OPEN |
Are the role and structure of the AB adequately defined? |
2014-09-19 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-144 Wide Review |
OPEN |
Chairs are asking for clarification for Wide Review |
2014-10-02 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-157 editorial CR revision |
OPEN |
Requirements for republishing a CR with non-substantive changes |
2015-02-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-162 Representing multiple groups |
OPEN |
Should participants in Working Groups be allowed to represent more than one organisation? |
2015-05-04 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-168 member hosts? |
OPEN |
Are W3C hosts members of W3C? |
2016-08-03 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-170 PatPol for guests |
OPEN |
Meeting guests need to respect patent policy |
2016-08-03 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-172 Define MoU |
OPEN |
What is a "Memorandum of Understanding"? |
2016-08-14 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-7 EASYAPPEAL |
CLOSED |
Make appealing decisions more believably possible and available |
2013-06-06 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-34 good standing |
CLOSED |
Remove the Good Standing rules from the process document? |
2013-07-08 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-97 AB-Name |
CLOSED |
Is using the term "Board" in "Advisory Board" really accurate and representative? |
2014-06-04 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-98 meeting rules |
CLOSED |
What are requirements for meetings |
2014-06-11 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-101 better diagrams |
CLOSED |
Improve the diagrams in the Process document |
2014-06-18 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-109 Unreviewed Charter Extension |
CLOSED |
Should AC approval be required to extend a charter |
2014-08-19 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-111 CharterInterest |
CLOSED |
W3C creates a charter based on interest from the Members and Team |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-112 |
CLOSED |
Remove Activity Proposals |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-113 |
CLOSED |
Advisory Committee Review of Charter Extentions |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-115 ActivityStatementRevision |
CLOSED |
Revising the Activity Statement for each Activity every 6 months |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-116 CharterAnnoucement |
CLOSED |
Announcing a Working Group Charter |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-117 ActivityAppealDissent |
CLOSED |
Requirement for dissent in the AC Review of an Activity Proposal to Appeal an approval |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-118 ContextInformation |
CLOSED |
Context Informaton in Activity Proposals |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-119 CharterScope |
CLOSED |
Description of the Activity/Charter's scope |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-120 LevelOfMembeEffort |
CLOSED |
threshold level of effort that Members are expected to pledge |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-121 IPinforInCharters |
CLOSED |
Intellectual property information.in charters |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-122 WhoBenefits |
CLOSED |
What community is expected to benefit from this Activity? |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-123 FirstMeetingDateForWG |
CLOSED |
Date of the first face-to-face meeting.of a newly chartered WG |
2014-08-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-128 Lack of Test Cases |
CLOSED |
Lack of test cases is a major contributor to schedule delay. |
2014-09-13 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-129 CoordGroups |
CLOSED |
Should the Process define Coordination Groups? |
2014-09-13 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-132 voting |
CLOSED |
Change the voting system for elections? |
2014-09-14 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-134 Appeal non-WG creation |
CLOSED |
Appeal against decisions *not* to create a group? |
2014-09-15 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-135 AC appeal in WG |
CLOSED |
Direct appeal of WG decisions for AC? |
2014-09-15 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-137 rationalise heartbeat |
CLOSED |
Rationalise the heartbeats in chapter 6 and 7 |
2014-09-16 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-138 editor-free |
CLOSED |
Does the process assume ‘an’ editor, or is group-editing formally ok? |
2014-09-16 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-140 The Team in the process |
CLOSED |
The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process document is out of date |
2014-09-18 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-143 Abstract grammar |
CLOSED |
The grammar in the abstract is somewhat unclear |
2014-10-02 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-145 W3Chair... |
CLOSED |
Clean up mentions of W3C Chair, COO etc |
2014-10-22 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-148 Consider Liaisons |
CLOSED |
Consider Liaison when deciding who should review a REC Track document |
2014-11-17 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-151 Resigning from a WG |
CLOSED |
How to resign from a working group |
2015-01-11 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-152 Regress Editorial Change |
CLOSED |
Process2014 Regresses Editorial Revision of RECs |
2015-01-13 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-154 AC review default confidenitality |
CLOSED |
SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? |
2015-01-30 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-158 New or continued WG? |
CLOSED |
Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? |
2015-02-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-159 define editorial change |
CLOSED |
Remove the current circularity in definition of "editorial change" |
2015-04-07 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-164 Appeal Cleanup |
CLOSED |
Clean up the description of Appeals throughout the Process Document |
2015-07-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-165 List of Appealable Decisions |
CLOSED |
Where and how should an appealable decision be identified |
2015-07-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-166 Appeals of Decisions not in the Process |
CLOSED |
How should appeals for decisions not mentioned in the Process Document be documented |
2015-07-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-167 Proposal Rejection with positive reviews |
CLOSED |
Allow appeal of the Director's rejection of a Proposal up for AC Review if there were positive reviews |
2015-07-12 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-169 Team submission consensus |
CLOSED |
Consensus on a Team Submission |
2016-08-03 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-174 |
CLOSED |
Rescinding a Recommendation in conflict with later versions and patent obligations |
2016-10-10 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-106 TR-graveyard |
RAISED |
The graveyard of /TR |
2014-08-08 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-126 autoWDpublish |
RAISED |
Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs |
2014-09-10 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-127 Horizontal Group Input |
RAISED |
Can we improve input from 'horizontal' groups (WAI, I18N, ...) |
2014-09-13 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-130 BG CG process |
RAISED |
Should the Process define Business and Community Groups? |
2014-09-14 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-136 Public input |
RAISED |
Does process adequately cater for public input? |
2014-09-15 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-139 non-members in member submission |
RAISED |
What are the rights and obligations of non-member participants in the creation of a member submission? |
2014-09-18 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-149 no-delegation |
RAISED |
Are there things the director should not be able to delegate? |
2014-11-26 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-155 Errata Access in RECs |
RAISED |
Errata access from TR page |
2015-02-07 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-156 Errata vs REC track process |
RAISED |
Do we need separate Errata and REC Track Processes? |
2015-02-08 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-160 Dismissal without cause |
RAISED |
Director can dismis a AB or TAG participant without giving a cause? |
2015-04-09 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-161 Voting Rules in Charter |
RAISED |
Sections 3.4 and 6.2.6 have different statements about Voting rules in a Charter |
2015-04-09 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-163 consortium membership |
RAISED |
How should consortia which are members of W3C nominate representatives and commit IPR? |
2015-05-06 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-173 Affiliate Memberships |
RAISED |
Affiliate Memberships are undefined in the Process Document |
2016-10-10 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-175 multiple hats? |
RAISED |
Can a group member represent more than one organisation? |
2016-11-07 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-176 charter-process-substantive-changes |
RAISED |
Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews |
2016-12-16 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-177 editorial-minor-confusion |
RAISED |
Editorial changes often called "minor changes" |
2016-12-20 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-178 CEPC |
RAISED |
Add CEPC in the Process Document |
2017-02-17 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-179 nomcom |
RAISED |
Should we have a nomination committee seeking candidates for the AB and TAG? |
2017-02-22 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-180 implementation experience |
RAISED |
"Implementation experience" description should clearly identify likelihood of broad acceptance |
2017-02-22 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-181 sentence |
RAISED |
A sentence was removed in the AC meeting and it, or something like it, should be put back |
2017-02-23 |
Process Document |
0 |
ISSUE-182 CRballots |
RAISED |
Process2014 introduced an AC ballot for CR transitions and now we have a ballot open for a year |
2017-02-23 |
Process Document |
0 |