This is a page from the Cascading Style Sheets Working Group Blog. Some other places to find information are the “current work” page, the www-style mailing list, the Future of CSS syndicator, and the issue list on Github.
Do you want to know how the CSS WG works? Fantasai has written about:csswg, An Inside View of the CSS Working Group at W3C.
The CSS Working Group has published a First Public Working Draft of CSS Values and Units Level 5. This module defines a variety of value types for CSS. This module is currently drafted as a diff spec over CSS Values and Units Level 4, and defines several new generic value functions that can be used nearly anywhere in CSS. Additions since Level 4 are listed in the Changes section and include:
*-progress()
family of functions*-mix()
family of functions*-progress()
function, they allow interpolation along a given range.
first-valid()
brings the ability back for these cases.)
<em>
inside of a context that’s already italics can automatically switch to being unitalicized; or nested lists can automatically cycle between several list-style-type
values regardless of nesting depth.
content
property, and only pulled the attribute value as a string; this spec allows it to parse to multiple types of values, and be used anywhere.
random()
and random-item()
functions sibling-count()
and sibling-index()
functionscalc-size()
functionauto
or max-content
) to be adjusted similar to calc()
. Most importantly, this allows such keywords to be interpolated with lengths, allowing things like interpolating height: auto
to height: 0
. The new interpolate-size
property allows authors to opt into this interpolation behavior by default (as back-compat prevents us from doing it automatically).
url()
modifiers allow control over cross-origin requests etc.
Please send feedback by either filing an issue in GitHub (preferable) or sending mail to the (archived) public mailing list www-style@w3.org with the spec code ([css-values-5]
) and your comment topic in the subject line. (Alternatively, you can email one of the editors and ask them to forward your comment.)