Discussion of format of site: some concern about the foreground/background
choices.
Action Item: Jim to discuss site foreground/background with Kitch.
Discussion of what information people are asked to submit to Kitch/Jim.
Jb: maybe include reference to audience (unless it is too obvious).
What criteria should we use to decide what goes on the list and what
doesn't.
Ss: conferences that highlight development, design and implementation
Ja: what about NFB conference?
Ss: thinks that those that are appropriate to create awareness
Discussion: maybe a heading or keywords associated with
Action Item: Jim and Kitch to develop a short list of criteria for
submissions.
Ja: Internationalization - very important - people around the world
are
encouraged to send input.
Jb: how else can we ensure that the listing is kept up to date?
We could ask major organizations to put us on their mailing lists.
Kc: there is a regular list published in England. Will forward such to Jim.
Ja: we should also have a listing of magazine articles that mention
WAI.
Jb: will add something like that to the deliverables. Somebody in the
W3C
was tracking that stuff. Will try to pull out just the
access stuff.
Ja: will there be a listing on a web site?
Jb: yes.
Action Item: Judy to look into a press article list.
Action Item: someone? will refine IETF conference listing
Pb: would it be useful to have a rating of the conference to indicate
if it
is being covered, should be covered, not important, etc.
Kc: will integrate the TIDE information
Ja: there is already an Articles, Chapters ,Books… would this be a place
to
put the press compilation activity?
Jb: No - this is specifically for book, chapters, modules etc.
Ss: should indicate the priorities on the index
Hb: should be sorted in some meaningful way.
Jb: how would you suggest ordering them?
Wl: what is the method for keeping the document updated? E.g. knows
we have
started the policy reference area even though the draft indicates that
it
is not started.
Hb: how will this be used: will only EO people look at it. If
others will
use it publicly, then it might need a different structure.
Jb: currently in a public space. Has some concerns that outsiders will
take
this as firm commitments. Do we need a more private space to
work in.
Comments: Kc: yes.
Jb: would have to look at the security aspects.
Anon: should have a standard disclaimer up front. Seconded by Chuck.
Priorities:
Anon: we need to include a "Done" priority (e.g. on CSS2 and HTML4
new
access features).
Ss: what is "User Information & Involvement/ Related Projects"
that my name
appears against.
Pb: interested in that particular strand as well.
Action Item: Judy, Sheila and Peter will have an off-line call about
User
Information & Involvement/ Related Projects.
Some discussion of "Scenario" section. William offered to take on
Scenarios. William should try to get info about any existing
work from Kitch.
Ja: Judy can edit the Events Calendar section to indicate the definite
status: ongoing - remove Judy, and question marks. Under notes, say,
"please submit".
Hb: on tables! Would change it to examples of tables rather than
implementation of table.
Some discussion of Peterborough Agenda.
Action Item: Judy will post revised meeting schedule.
Meeting adjourned at 12:07 EDT
----
Starling Access Services
"Access A World Of Possibility"
e-mail: info@starlingweb.com
URL: http://www.starlingweb.com
Phone: 613-820-2272 FAX: 613-820-6983