Spec Review: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Put a link to the spec with it's full name from the title element, i.e., "<nowiki>[<latest version uri> | <full title including version></nowiki>". | * Put a link to the spec with it's full name from the title element, i.e., "<nowiki>[<latest version uri> | <full title including version></nowiki>". | ||
* In a bullet list, add entries for every interaction we have with the spec, including whether we looked at it, what we decided to do, any action items taken, links to conversations with the spec developers, etc. Each bullet begins with a date. | * In a bullet list, add entries for every interaction we have with the spec, including whether we looked at it, what we decided to do, any action items taken, links to conversations with the spec developers, etc. Each bullet begins with a date. | ||
[https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/index.php?action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Spec_Review_Page Create a spec review page] | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 20 January 2016
Specifications that have been reviewed by the APA WG are listed on the Spec Review category page.
Instructions for tracking a spec:
- Create a page using the title of the spec.
- Begin the page with "[[Category:Spec Review]]".
- Optionally, add a category for the technology, such as HTML, CSS, SVG, etc.
- Potentially, add a category for the WG developing the spec.
- Put a link to the spec with it's full name from the title element, i.e., "[<latest version uri> | <full title including version>".
- In a bullet list, add entries for every interaction we have with the spec, including whether we looked at it, what we decided to do, any action items taken, links to conversations with the spec developers, etc. Each bullet begins with a date.