Tamil Gap Analysis

The W3C needs to make sure that the text layout and typographic needs of scripts and languages around the world are built in to technologies such as HTML, CSS, SVG, etc. so that Web pages and eBooks can look and behave as people expect around the world.

This page documents difficulties people encounter when trying to use the Tamil language in the Tamil script on the Web.

Having identified an issue, it investigates the current status with regards to web specifications and implementations by user agents (browsers, e-readers, etc.), and attempts to prioritise the severity of the issue for web users.

A summary of this report and others can be found as part of the language matrix.

For a description of the Tamil script see the (non-W3C) page Tamil, which summarises aspects of the orthography and typographic features, including relevant Unicode characters and their use.

This version of the document is a preliminary analysis

Gap analysis work usually starts with a preliminary analysis, conducted quickly by one or a small group of experts. Then a more detailed analysis is carried out, involving a wider range of experts. The detailed analysis may involve the development of tests, in order to illustrate issues and track results for browsers. The next phase is ongoing maintenance. It is expected that the resulting document will not be frozen: as gaps are fixed, this should be noted in the document. It is also possible that new gaps are noticed or arise, and they can be added to this document when that happens.

As the gap analysis develops, the requirements for features that are problematic should be described in the companion document, Tamil Layout Requirements. Links to the appropriate part of that document should be added to this document as the material is created. Note that the requirements document should not contain any technology-specific information: all of that belongs here.

This document not only describes gaps, it also attempts to prioritise them in terms of the impact on the local user. The prioritisation is indicated by colour.

Key:

It is important to note that these colours do not indicate to what extent a particular features is broken. They indicate the impact of a broken or missing feature on the content author or end user.

Basic styling is the level that would be generally accepted as sufficient for most Web pages. Advanced level support would include additional features one might expect to include in ebooks or other advanced typographic formats. There may be features of a script or language that are not supported on the Web, but that are not generally regarded as necessary (usually archaic or obscure features). In this case, the feature can be described here, but the status should be marked as OK.

The decision as to what priority level is assigned to a described gap is down to the experts doing the gap analysis. It may not always be straightforward to decide. If a given section in this document refers to more than one feature that is broken, each with different impacts on Web users, the priority for the section should be the lowest denominator.

A cell can be scored as OK if the feature in question is specified in an appropriate specification, and is supported by user agents. A specification that is in CR or later and has two implementations in 'major' browsers will count. This means that the feature may not be supported in all browsers yet. (At some point in the future we may try to distinguish, visually, whether support is available in a specification but still pending in major browsers or applications.)

See also General page layout & progression for features such as column layout, page turning direction, etc. that are affected by text direction.

Are the script requirements for vertically oriented text met? What about if you mix vertical text with scripts that are normally only horizontal? Do you need a switch to use different characters in vertical vs. horizontal text? Does the browser support short runs of horizontal text in vertical lines (tate-chu-yoko in Japanese) as expected? Is the orientation of characters and the directional ordering of characters supported as needed?

GitHub issue #70

This issue is applicable to many Indian languages.

When upright characters appear in vertical lines of text, browsers need to tailor grapheme cluster rules so that full orthographic syllables represented as conjuncts, are kept together.

See requirements at: Indic Layout Requirements, but add to those the points made in Typographic character units in complex scripts.

Gecko appears to segment on grapheme clusters. Blink, and Webkit keep conjuncts together. But all engines have problems with vowel-signs, especially but not only pre-base vowel-signs.

Marked as advanced, since vertical text is not a common use case. In writing sytems like modern Tamil, it is even less common, since conjuncts are rarely used.

Interactive test, When devanagari characters are rendered upright in vertical text, orthographic syllables containing conjuncts are kept together

Gecko • Blink • Webkit

tbd

If this script runs right-to-left, are there any issues when handling that? Is bidirectional text adequately supported? What about numbers and expressions? Do the Unicode bidi controls and HTML markup provide the support needed? Is isolation of directional runs problematic?

Do the standard fallback fonts used in browsers (eg. serif, sans-serif, cursive, etc.) match expectations? Are special font or OpenType features needed for this script that are not available?

Does the script in question require additional user control features to support alterations to the position or shape of glyphs, for example adjusting the distance between the base text and diacritics, or changing the glyphs used in a systematic way? Do you need to be able to compose/decompose conjuncts, or show characters that are otherwise hidden, etc?

This covers ways of modifying the glyphs, such as for italicisation, bolding, oblique, etc. Do italic fonts lean in the right direction? Is synthesised italicisation problematic? Are there other problems relating to bolding or italicisation - perhaps relating to generalised assumptions of applicability?

If this script is cursive (eg. Arabic, N’Ko, Syriac, etc), are there problems or needed features related to the handling of cursive text? Do cursive links break if parts of a word are marked up or styled? Do Unicode joiner and non-joiner characters behave as expected?

Does your script need special text transforms that are not supported? Does your script convert letters to uppercase, capitalised and lowercase alternatives according to your typographic needs? Do you need to to convert between half-width and full-width presentation forms?

Are there any character repertoire issues preventing use of this script on the Web? Do variation selectors need attention? Are there any other encoding-related issues?

This is about how text is divided into graphemes, words, sentences, etc., and behaviour associated with that. Do Unicode grapheme clusters appropriately segment character units for your script? When you double- or triple-click on the text, is the expected range of characters highlighted? When you move through the text with the cursor, or backspace, etc. do you see the expected behaviour? (Some of the answers to these questions may be picker up in other sections, such as line-breaking, or initial-letter styling.)

GitHub issue #89

If you try to style part of a syllable by putting a span around the characters you want to style, the overall shape of the syllable is broken.

Here are a number of examples:

Devanagari. If you put a span around the first two characters of the 3-character syllable स्तिठड (eg. in order to color or otherwise style it), the i vowel-sign no longer appears at the start of the word, but looks like it modifies the next character (ठ).
Gujarati. If you put a span around the ન્ડ two characters of the 3-character syllable ન્ડિ in ઇન્ડિય (eg. in order to color or otherwise style it), the i vowel-sign no longer appears at the start of the word, but looks like it modifies the next character (ય).
Bengali. If you put a span around the ব first character of the two character syllable বি in বিভাগের (eg. in order to color or otherwise style it), the vowel-sign no longer appears at the start of the word, but looks like incorrect inputting at the wrong place.
Tamil. If you put a span around the ம first character of the two character syllable மொ in மொழி (eg. in order to color or otherwise style it), the half part of o vowel-sign no longer appears at the start of the word, but looks like incorrect inputting at the wrong place.

Apparently this requirement is a bit difficult to cater to as it requires the knowledge to be transferred by the font to the rendering engine about which part of the glyph is attributed to which code-point in storage. However, if it can be achieved, nothing like it.

GitHub issue #72

The Unicode concept of 'grapheme cluster' currently fails to represent the small number of conjuncts that are used in modern Tamil, ie. kṣa க்ஷ and the two alternative sequences for srī, ஶ்ரீ and ஸ்ரீ. This means that various editing operations, line breaking algorithms, vertical text, etc. are liable to break text at the wrong point when those conjuncts are used. For more details, see the relevant sections.

Indic Layout Requirements provides a grammar for indian orthographic syllable boundaries which works for the consonant clusters in Tamil which don't use conjuncts.

Specs: CSS uses the concept of 'typographic character unit', rather than grapheme cluster, in its specs with the explanation that these cases are beyond the scope of the grapheme cluster concept and that implementations should provide appropriate support.

Are there specific problems related to punctuation or the interaction of the text with punctuation (for example separation of punctuation from previous text, but allowing no line break between)? Are there issues related to handling of abbreviation, ellipsis, or iteration? Are there problems related to bracketing information or demarcating things such as proper nouns, etc?

Are there any issues when dealing with quotations marks, especially when nested? Should block quotes be indented or handled specially?

The ruby spec currently specifies an initial subset of requirements for fine-tuning the typography of phonetic and semantic annotations of East Asian text, including furigana, pinyin and zhuyin fuhao systems. Is is adequate for what it sets out to do? What other controls will be needed in the future? What about other types of inline annotation, such as warichu? (For referent-type notes such as footnotes, see below.)

This is about ways of marking text (see also specific sections dedicated to quotations and inline notes/annotations). Is it possible to express emphasis or highlight content as expected? Bold, italic and under-/over-lines are not always appropriate, and some scripts have their own unique ways of doing things, that are not in the Western tradition at all. Text delimiters mark certain items or sections off from the main text, such as book names in Chinese, quotations, head markers in Tibetan, etc, and often involve the use of punctuation. Is there any behaviour that isn't well supported, such as overlines for numeric digits in Syriac? Are there issues about the positioning or use of underlines? Some aspects related to the drawing of lines alongside or through text involve local typographic considerations. Do underlines need to be broken in special ways for this script? Do you need support for additional line shapes or widths? Does the distance or position of the lines relative to the text need to vary in ways that are not achievable? Are lines correctly drawn relative to vertical text?

GitHub issue #90

Indian language text has some signs called as Matras which sometimes join above the shirorekha or below the normal baseline.

Applications should ensure that the underline and overline when getting rendered, should adaquetly be taken into consideration. Chrome browser seemed to be perfectly rendering the underline and overline feature by breaking the same where a matra occurs. Internet Explorer also handles it a bit differently by appropriately lowering or heightening the respective lines.

If the script has its own set of number digits, are there any issues in how they are used? Does the script or language use special format patterns that are problematic (eg. 12,34,000 in India)? What about date/time formats and selection - and are non-Gregorian calendars needed? Do percent signs and other symbols associated with number work correctly, and do numbers need special decorations, (like in Ethiopic or Syriac)? How about the management of personal names, addresses, etc. in web pages: are there issues?

GitHub issue #91

Generally Latin Numerals are acceptable in Devanagari text. Most of the user community identifies with them. However, there could be cases where certain web-pages would prefer to have numerals in Devanagari to cater to mono-lingual (mono-script rather) readers. This is particularly required for input types number and date. It would be useful if the input type values are augmented with the script mnemonics e.g. number_deva or date_deva instead of changing it for entire page through some locale setting. There could be cases where a user may require both kinds of numbering in the same web-page.

Does the browser capture the rules about the way text in your script wraps when it hits the end of a line? Does line-breaking wrap whole 'words' at a time, or characters, or something else (such as syllables in Tibetan and Javanese)? What characters should not appear at the end or start of a line, and what should be done to prevent that?

GitHub issue #79

None of the major browsers support Tamil hyphenation out of the box. This is a problem for text in narrow columns, because Tamil words tend to be long.

In the case of Tamil, simple dictionary lookup is not enough, because the language is highly inflexional and a significant element of morphological analysis is needed in addition to other Tamil-specific orthographic rules for placement of break opportunities.

Tamil also needs to hyphenate without adding a visual marker, as shown in the picture where yellow text indicates hyphenated words that have been wrapped.

hyphenation_ta

Specs: css-text-3 provides the hyphens property, but browsers need to implement the actual mechanism for processing the text.

(It is possible to produce manual hyphenation, but given the number of words that need to be hyphenated in a typical Tamil text, this isn't going to be very useful. The html spec defines the wbr element, which could be used because it doesn't produce a hyphen mark, it only marks a potential break point. does produce a hyphen, so it isn't helpful for Tamil.)

css-text-4 provides the hyphenate-character property, which should allow authors to indicate that Tamil should have no visible marker for hyphenation.

Tests & results: interactive test, hyphens:auto will produce hyphenation for Tamil words

Gecko, Blink, and Webkit all fail to hyphenate the Tamil text when hyphens is set to auto.

Santhosh Thottingal has written a JavaScript-based tool for hyphenating Indian scripts, which mostly relies on syllable-breaks plus a few additional rules.

Browser bug reports: Chromium • Webkit • Mozilla

Priority: The impact of this is basic, because of the difficulties of handling text in narrow columns.

GitHub issue #78

line-break:anywhere causes lines to break inside words. It should break lines on grapheme cluster boundaries for all consonant clusters apart from the 3 special conjuncts. Chrome doesn't support the anywhere value. Firefox and Safari behave as expected.

The exceptions are the sequences க்ஷ k͓ʂ, and ஶ்ரீ ʃ͓ɾī / ஸ்ரீ s͓ɾī (which are synonyms). These sequences should not be broken during line breaking. Correct line breaking of these conjunct-forming sequences are not supported by default by Unicode grapheme clusters (which split them in two), and requires the application of tailored rules.

Test: line-break:anywhere should not break shri or ksha conjuncts.

Firefox is ok for shri and for ksha without a vowel-sign, but in ரிக்ஷா leaves க் on previous line, still shaped for half a conjunct. Safari is ok for shri in HTML, but leaves ஸ் behind in textarea; for ksha, in textarea leaves க் behind, in HTML initially moves whole word to next line, then puts ரி back at end of line as you decrease the window width.

Similar results are produced for word-break: break-all, except that Chrome supports this property and value. Chrome wraps ஸ்ரீந as a single unit and ரிக்ஷா as a unit.

The impact of this is advanced, although it would be good to fix it.

GitHub issue #77

In general, there are no issues with ordinary Tamil line-breaking. Line-break opportunities occur at the spaces between words, and characters that are not supposed to appear at a line start do not.

The exception to the latter is that । [U+0964 DEVANAGARI DANDA] and ॥ [U+0965 DEVANAGARI DOUBLE DANDA] will wrap alone to the beginning of a line if there is a space between them and the previous word. This is the case for all browsers.

Test: A line should not start with a danda character even if it is separated from the previous word by a space.

The impact of this is advanced, although it would be good to fix it.

When text in a paragraph needs to have flush lines down both sides, does it follow the rules for your script? Does the script need assistance to conform to a grid pattern? Does your script allow punctuation to hang outside the text box at the start or end of a line? Where adjustments are need to make a line flush, how is that done? Do you shrink/stretch space between words and/or letters? Are word baselines stretched, as in Arabic? What about paragraph indents, or the need for logical alignment keywords, such as start/end, rather than left/right?

GitHub issue #80

Tamil words can be quite long, which can cause problems for justified text, especially in narrow columns, because large gaps can appear between words, or at the end of a line if only one word fits on that line. To mitigate this, especially in the absence of hyphenation, lines that are justified in Tamil should automatically stretch words to fit in the following cases.

When only one word fits on a line, that word should be stretched to fit the whole line. Here is an example:

justification_one_word

Where a small number of words appears on a line, the words on that line may also be stretched, so as to reduce the inter-word spacing. Here is an example:

justification_in_newsprint

Note that justification doesn't stretch words unless one of these cases applies.

However, a distinctive feature of Tamil is that the adjustments applied should equally expand the space between all unconnected, spacing glyphs (including the space between various vowel-signs and their base), rather than solely putting space around syllables, grapheme clusters or even code points. Here is an example:

partridge

More information:

* Approaches to full justification * Tamil Layout Requirements * Tamil orthography notes

Specs: css-text provides an auto value for the text-justify property, which relies on the UA to determine the justification algorithm to follow, based on a balance between performance and adequate presentation quality, and taking into account writing system and language.

The spec says: For example, the UA could use by default a justification method that is a simple universal compromise for all writing systems—such as primarily expanding word separators and between CJK typographic letter units along with secondarily expanding between Southeast Asian typographic letter units. Then, in cases where the content language of the paragraph is known, it could choose a more language-tailored justification behavior e.g. following the Requirements for Japanese Text Layout for Japanese [JLREQ], using cursive elongation for Arabic, using inter-word for German, etc.

Tests & results: interactive test, With CSS set to text-align:justify; text-justify:auto, when large gaps appear between justified words in Tamil the browser will automatically reduce the gaps by stretching words on the affected line.

Gecko: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/94.0*
Blink: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.69 Safari/537.36*
Webkit: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.1 Safari/605.1.15*

interactive test, With CSS set to text-align:justify; text-justify:auto, when a narrow column means that only one Tamil word fits on a line, the word will be stretched to fit the whole width of the column

Gecko: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/94.0*
Blink: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.69 Safari/537.36*
Webkit: ❌ *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.1 Safari/605.1.15*

interactive test, When inter-character spacing is applied to Tamil, equal space is added between all unligated spacing glyphs, including between the glyphs forming vowel-signs and their base characters, but ligated glyphs and non-spacing combining characters are not separated from the base.

Gecko: ✅❌ Inter-character spacing is applied, but inter-glyph spacing is not. *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/96.0*
Blink: ❌ No inter-character spacing is applied. *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36*
Webkit: ❌ No inter-character spacing is applied. *Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.2 Safari/605.1.15*

Browser bug reports: Gecko • Blink • Webkit

Priority: The impact of this is marked as advanced, because oversized gaps in text seem to be fairly common in Tamil printed materials, but perhaps this should be basic instead? Availability of hyphenation for Tamil would also ease this issue, but that is not yet supported by browsers.

Some scripts create emphasis or other effects by spacing out the words, letters or syllables in a word. Are there requirements for this script/language that are unsupported? (For justification related spacing, see below.)

GitHub issue #118

This issue applies to all languages that use letter-spacing.

Currently browsers that apply letter-spacing do so by adding a space after every letter in the text that is tracked. This results in a superfluous space at the end of the range, which creates an inappropriate gap before the following text. Letter spacing at the end of a line makes the line look misaligned in justified or right-justified text. It also has implications for text that has other styling, such as an outline or a coloured background, at the same time as being stretched.

For more details, see this GitHub issue, which is being used to track this gap. Please add any discussion there, and not to this issue.

GitHub issue #117

This issue is applicable to most languages that form conjuncts from consonant clusters using an invisible virama.

A consonant cluster that uses a conjunct (rather than visible virama) should not be split when letter-spacing is applied.

Relying on grapheme clusters as the main segmentation approach fails for many Indic scripts because conjuncts are composed of multiple grapheme clusters, and should be kept together as a unit.

For these situations it is necessary to tailor the segmentation algorithm, so that it recognises the whole consonant cluster plus any attached vowel-signs or combining characters as a single unit.

For examples see Typographic character units in complex scripts.

See also notes on segmentation for the following orthographies relevant to this project: Hindi, Bangla, Punjabi, Tamil.

css-text-3 CSS uses the concept of 'typographic character unit', rather than grapheme cluster, in its specs with the explanation that the cases just described go beyond the scope of the grapheme cluster concept and that implementations should provide appropriate support. The spec doesn't provide details about the support needed for each language.

The Unicode Consortium made some attempts to address this issue, but it has so far not yielded results. CLDR now flags up a few scripts for which conjuncts are common.

Keeping conjuncts together is a pretty basic requirement. It is not possible to work around this problem.

That said, letter-spacing is not relied on for essential content authoring, therefore the priority was set to advanced.

Interactive test, When letter-spacing is applied to Devanagari the browser will not split conjuncts
Interactive test, When letter-spacing is applied to Bengali the browser will not split conjuncts

Gecko: ❌ Most of the half-form conjuncts (which is the large majority of all conjuncts) have space inserted between the glyphs that make up the conjunct (ie. not split into consonants with visible viramas). Vertically-combined glyphs tend not to be split.
Blink: ❌ Same as Gecko.
Webkit: ❌ Same as Gecko.

tbd

Does the browser support requirements for baseline alignment between mixed scripts and in general?

The CSS Counter Styles specification describes a limited set of simple and complex styles for counters to be used in list numbering, chapter heading numbering, etc.The rules plus more counter styles (totalling around 120 for over 30 scripts) are listed in the document Ready-made Counter Styles. Do these cover your needs? Are the details correct? Are there other aspects related to counters and lists that need to be addressed?

GitHub issue #82

Customisable counters are needed for many languages.

There is no general support for counters that use the Tamil script or digits. There is also no way for users to create their own counter styles, or to modify things such as prefix/suffix assignments for particular contexts.

This gap is now fixed. For more details, see this GitHub issue, which is being used to track this gap. Please add any discussion there, and not to this issue.

What follows are Tamil-specific notes.

For Tamil the numeric style is most common, although there is also a question about whether an alphabetic counter style needs to be defined for Tamil. An additive style is used in older texts.

Specs: predefined-counter-styles Two Tamil counter styles are defined in this document: tamil (numeric) and ancient-tamil (additive).

css-counter-styles-3 All of these counter styles could be defined by users if the Counter Styles spec's generic mechanism for defining counter styles was implemented. The spec is essentially done. The numeric style is defined explicitly in this specification; the additive style, however, relies on the user-defined mechanism in order to be applied.

Issue, Are alphabetic counter styles common in Tamil content? Open.

Tests & results: I18n test suite, Simple numeric.
The numeric counter style is only supported by Gecko. Blink and Webkit do not support it.

I18n test suite, Ancient-Tamil.
Neither Gecko, Blink, nor Webkit support it.

I18n test suite, Basic custom counter styles.
The spec is essentially done, but so far only Gecko has implemented it. Blink and Webkit do not support it (however, we are hopefully close seeing this feature supported in Blink, too).

Browser bug reports: Blink

Priority: The impact of the lack of support cited here is mediated by the tendency to use western counters, however there appears to be a desire for native styles (at least the numeric) to be made available. So the impact is being marked as advanced.

Does the browser or ereader correctly handle special styling of the initial letter of a line or paragraph, such as for drop caps or similar? How about the size relationship between the large letter and the lines alongide? where does the large letter anchor relative to the lines alongside? is it normal to include initial quote marks in the large letter? is the large letter really a syllable? etc. Are all of these things working as expected?

GitHub issue #116

When the start of a line contains a consonant cluster that uses a conjunct (rather than visible virama), ::first-letter should highlight the whole cluster. Usually, modern Tamil has only two of these conjuncts, however one of them can be created in two ways (making a total of 3 clusters to test).

This doesn't work well if segmentation relies on Unicode grapheme clusters, since a conjunct with two consonants will be parsed as two grapheme clusters (the first ending after the virama, and the second starting with the second consonant and including any following vowel-signs or other combining characters).

For these situations it is necessary to tailor the segmentation algorithm, so that it recognises the whole consonant cluster plus any attached vowel-signs or combining characters as a single unit. This is a particular issue for Tamil, since all other clusters are typically decomposed and show the virama.

Specs:

The Unicode Consortium made some attempts to address this issue, but it has so far not yielded results. CLDR now flags up a few scripts for which conjuncts are common. Tamil is not among them.

Tests & results: Interactive test, When ::first-letter is applied to Tamil the browser will select the KSHA and SHRI conjuncts as a single unit
Gecko produces the expected result. Blink, and Webkit only select the first consonant+pulli.

Browser bug reports: Chromium • Webkit

Priority: The impact here is advanced, since the impact of the failures cited here on the user is likely to be very small, especially since they can resort to markup in the rare cases where the conjuncts are not properly handled. Not many words begin with the conjuncts tested. (One example of such would be ஶ்ரீநகர்)

GitHub issue #84

Having selected the correct text for highlighting, it is important to ensure proper alignment of the baseline and height of the initial letter highlight relative to the other lines of text. This doesn't work well without help from the dedicated CSS properties, initial-letters and the initial-letters-align. Unfortunately, only Safari supports the first property, and it requires the -webkit prefix, so this is still an immature feature.

Safari aligns the alphabetic baseline of the highlighted text with that on the specified number of lines. The relationship between the highlighted letters and the first line of the paragraph appears to be based on cap height, but is not clear. The requirements for that relationship are not yet really clear, despite the information in Indian Layout Requirements.

The impact here is advanced, since it is mainly needed for advanced layouts.

How are the main text area and ancilliary areas positioned and defined? Are there any special requirements here, such as dimensions in characters for the Japanese kihon hanmen? The book cover for scripts that are read right-to-left scripts is on the right of the spine, rather than the left. Is that provided for? When content can flow vertically and to the left or right, how do you specify the location of objects, text, etc. relative to the flow? For example, keywords 'left' and 'right' are likely to need to be reversed for pages written in English and page written in Arabic. Do tables and grid layouts work as expected? How do columns work in vertical text? Can you mix block of vertical and horizontal text correctly? Does text scroll in the expected direction? Other topics that belong here include any local requirements for things such as printer marks, tables of contents and indexes.

Does the script have special requirements for character grids or tables?

Does your script have special requirements for footnotes, endnotes or other necessary annotations of this kind in the way needed for your culture? (There is a section above for purely inline annotations, such as ruby or warichu. This section is more about annotation systems that separate the reference marks and the content of the notes.)

Are there special conventions for page numbering, or the way that running headers and the like are handled?

Are vertical form controls well supported? In right-to-left scripts, is it possible to set the base direction for a form field? Is the scroll bar on the correct side? etc.

Sometimes a script or language does things that are not common outside of its sphere of influence. This is a loose bag of additional items that weren't previously mentioned. This section may also be relevant for observations related to locale formats (such as number, date, currency, format support).

There are many other CSS modules which may need review for script-specific requirements, not to mention the SVG, HTML, Speech, MathML and other specifications. What else is likely to cause problems for worldwide deployment of the Web, and what requirements need to be addressed to make the Web function well locally?

Tamil Gap Analysis

Abstract

Status of This Document

1. Introduction

1.1 Work flow

1.2 Prioritization

2. Text direction

2.1 Vertical text

#70 Upright text in vertical lines doesn't segment correctly

The GAP

Priority

Tests

Action taken

Outcomes

2.2 Bidirectional text

3. Glyph shaping & positioning

3.1 Fonts & font styles

3.2 Context-based shaping and positioning

3.3 Letterform slopes, weights, & italics

3.4 Cursive text

3.5 Case & other character transforms

4. Typographic units

4.1 Characters & encoding

4.2 Grapheme/word segmentation & selection

#89 Spans around partial orthographic syllables can't be styled

#72 Grapheme clusters fail to represent syllabic conjuncts in Tamil

5. Punctuation & inline features

5.1 Phrase & section boundaries

5.2 Quotations & citations

5.3 Inline notes & annotations

5.4 Text decoration & other inline features

#90 Underline and overline need to clear glyph ascenders and descenders

5.5 Data formats & numbers

#91 Data formats need to be controllable by users

6. Line and paragraph layout

6.1 Line breaking & hyphenation

#79 Tamil hyphenation isn't supported

#78 Break anywhere fails on conjuncts

#77 Dandas are wrapped alone to the beginning of a line

6.2 Text alignment & justification

#80 Word stretching is not applied to justified Tamil text when large gaps appear between words.

6.3 Text spacing

#118 Browsers apply extraneous spaces when letter-spacing

#117 Letter-spacing splits conjuncts

The GAP

Priority

Tests & results

Action taken

Outcomes

6.4 Baselines, line-height, etc

6.5 Lists, counters, etc.

#82 Local counter styles are not well supported

FIXED !

6.6 Styling initials

#116 Tamil conjuncts are not selected as a single unit when styling initials

#84 initial-letter positioning is not widely available

7. Page & book layout

7.1 General page layout & progression

7.2 Grids & tables

7.3 Footnotes, endnotes, etc.

7.4 Page headers, footers, etc.

7.5 Forms & user interaction

8. Other

8.1 Culture-specific features

8.2 What else?