RDF 1.2 TriG

RDF Dataset Language

W3C Working Draft

More details about this document
This version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/WD-rdf12-trig-20230628/
Latest published version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-trig/
Latest editor's draft:
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-trig/spec/
History:
https://www.w3.org/standards/history/rdf12-trig/
Commit history
Test suite:
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-tests/trig/
Latest Recommendation:
https://www.w3.org/TR/trig
Editors:
Gregg Kellogg
Dominik Tomaszuk
Former editors:
Gavin Carothers
Andy Seaborne
Authors:
Chris Bizer (Freie Universität Berlin)
Richard Cyganiak (Freie Universität Berlin)
Feedback:
GitHub w3c/rdf-trig (pull requests, new issue, open issues)
public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org with subject line [rdf12-trig] … message topic … (archives)

Copyright © 2010-2023 World Wide Web Consortium. W3C® liability, trademark and permissive document license rules apply.

Abstract

This document defines a textual syntax for RDF called TriG that allows an RDF dataset to be completely written in a compact and natural text form, with abbreviations for common usage patterns and datatypes. TriG is an extension of the Turtle [RDF12-TURTLE] format.

RDF 1.2 TriG shares quoted triples with [RDF12-TURTLE] as a fourth kind of RDF term which can be used as the subject or object of another triple, making it possible to make statements about other statements.

RDF 1.2 TriG also shares the annotation syntax with [RDF12-TURTLE] which allows quoted triples to also be asserted.

Status of This Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at https://www.w3.org/TR/.

This document is part of the RDF 1.2 document suite. TriG is intended the meet the charter requirement of the RDF Working Group to define an RDF syntax for multiple graphs. TriG is an extension of the Turtle syntax for RDF [RDF12-TURTLE]. The current document is based on the original proposal by Chris Bizer and Richard Cyganiak.

This document was published by the RDF-star Working Group as a Working Draft using the Recommendation track.

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by W3C and its Members.

This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.

This document is governed by the 2 November 2021 W3C Process Document.

1. Introduction

This document defines TriG, a concrete syntax for RDF as defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax document [RDF12-CONCEPTS]. TriG is an extension of Turtle [RDF12-TURTLE], extended to support representing a complete RDF dataset.

2. TriG Language

This section is non-normative.

A TriG document allows writing down an RDF dataset in a compact textual form. It consists of a sequence of directives, triple statements, graph statements which contain triple-generating statements and optional blank lines. Comments may be given after a # that is not part of another lexical token and continue to the end of the line.

Graph statements are a pair of an IRI or blank node and a group of triple statements surrounded by braces ("{}"). The IRI or blank node of the graph statement may be used in another graph statement which implies taking the union of the tripes generated by each graph statement. An IRI or blank node used as a graph label may also reoccur as part of any triple statement. Optionally a graph statement may not not be labeled with an IRI. Such a graph statement corresponds to the Default Graph of an RDF dataset.

The construction of an RDF dataset from a TriG document is defined in 4. TriG Grammar and 5. Parsing.

2.1 Triple Statements

As TriG is an extention of the Turtle language it allows for any constructs from the Turtle language. Simple Triples, Predicate Lists, and Object Lists can all be used either inside a graph statement, or on their own as in a Turtle document. When outside a graph statement, the triples are considered to be part of the default graph of the RDF dataset.

2.2 Graph Statements

A graph statement pairs an IRIs or blank node with an RDF graph. The triple statements that make up the graph are enclosed in {}.

In a TriG document a graph IRI or blank node may be used as label for more than one graph statements. The graph label of a graph statement may be omitted. In this case the graph is considered the default graph of the RDF dataset.

A RDF dataset might contain only a single graph.

Example 1: Dataset with single graph 

# This document encodes one graph.
@prefix ex: <http://www.example.org/vocabulary#> .
@prefix : <http://www.example.org/exampleDocument#> .

:G1 { :Monica a ex:Person ;
    ex:name "Monica Murphy" ;
    ex:homepage <http://www.monicamurphy.org> ;
    ex:email <mailto:monica@monicamurphy.org> ;
    ex:hasSkill ex:Management ,
                ex:Programming .
}

A RDF dataset may contain a default graph, and named graphs.

Example 2: Dataset with default and named graphs 

# This document contains a default graph and two named graphs.

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .

# default graph
{
  <http://example.org/bob> dc:publisher "Bob" .
  <http://example.org/alice> dc:publisher "Alice" .
}

<http://example.org/bob> {
   _:a foaf:name "Bob" .
   _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:bob@oldcorp.example.org> .
   _:a foaf:knows _:b .
}

<http://example.org/alice> {
   _:b foaf:name "Alice" .
   _:b foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@work.example.org> .
}

TriG provides various alternative ways to write graphs and triples, giving the data writer choices for clarity:

Example 3: Alternative ways to write named graphs 

# This document contains a same data as the previous example.

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .

# default graph - no {} used.
<http://example.org/bob> dc:publisher "Bob" .
<http://example.org/alice> dc:publisher "Alice" .

# GRAPH keyword to highlight a named graph
# Abbreviation of triples using ;
GRAPH <http://example.org/bob>
{
   [] foaf:name "Bob" ;
      foaf:mbox <mailto:bob@oldcorp.example.org> ;
      foaf:knows _:b .
}

GRAPH <http://example.org/alice>
{
    _:b foaf:name "Alice" ;
        foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@work.example.org>
}

2.3 Quoted Triples

TriG shares the same syntax for representing quoted triples as Turtle, including the Annotation Syntax.

Example 4: TriG annotated triples 

  BASE <http://example.org/>
  PREFIX : <#>
  :G {
    _:a :name "Alice" {| :statedBy :bob |} .
  }

2.4 Other Terms

All other terms and directives come from Turtle.

2.4.1 Special Considerations for Blank Nodes

Blank nodes sharing the same identifier in differently labeled graph statements are considered to be the same blank node.

3. Conformance

As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.

The key words MUST and SHOULD in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

This specification defines conformance criteria for:

A conforming TriG document is a Unicode string that conforms to the grammar and additional constraints defined in 4. TriG Grammar, starting with the trigDoc production. A TriG document serializes an RDF dataset.

A conforming TriG parser is a system capable of reading TriG documents on behalf of an application. It makes the serialized RDF dataset, as defined in 5. Parsing, available to the application, usually through some form of API.

The IRI that identifies the TriG language is: http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/TriG

Note

This specification does not define how TriG parsers handle non-conforming input documents.

3.1 Media Type and Content Encoding

The media type of TriG is application/trig. The content encoding of TriG content is always UTF-8.

4. TriG Grammar

A TriG document is a Unicode [UNICODE] character string encoded in UTF-8. Unicode characters only in the range U+0000 to U+10FFFF inclusive are allowed.

4.1 White Space

White space (production WS) is used to separate two terminals which would otherwise be (mis-)recognized as one terminal. Rule names below in capitals indicate where white space is significant; these form a possible choice of terminals for constructing a TriG parser.

White space is significant in the production String.

4.2 Comments

Comments in TriG take the form of '#', outside an IRI or a string, and continue to the end of line (marked by characters U+000D or U+000A) or end of file if there is no end of line after the comment marker. Comments are treated as white space.

4.3 IRI References

Relative IRI references are resolved with base IRIs as per Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax [RFC3986] using only the basic algorithm in section 5.2. Neither Syntax-Based Normalization nor Scheme-Based Normalization (described in sections 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 of RFC3986) are performed. Characters additionally allowed in IRI references are treated in the same way that unreserved characters are treated in URI references, per section 6.5 of Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987].

The @base directive defines the Base IRI used to resolve relative IRI references per [RFC3986] section 5.1.1, "Base URI Embedded in Content". Section 5.1.2, "Base URI from the Encapsulating Entity" defines how the In-Scope Base IRI may come from an encapsulating document, such as a SOAP envelope with an xml:base directive or a mime multipart document with a Content-Location header. The "Retrieval URI" identified in 5.1.3, Base "URI from the Retrieval URI", is the URL from which a particular TriG document was retrieved. If none of the above specifies the Base URI, the default Base URI (section 5.1.4, "Default Base URI") is used. Each @base directive sets a new In-Scope Base URI, relative to the previous one.

4.4 Escape Sequences

There are three forms of escapes used in TriG documents:

Context where each kind of escape sequence can be used
numeric
escapes		 string
escapes		 reserved character
escapes
IRIs, used as RDF terms or as in @prefix or @base declarations yes no no
local names no no yes
Strings yes yes no
Note

%-encoded sequences are in the character range for IRIs and are explicitly allowed in local names. These appear as a '%' followed by two hex characters and represent that same sequence of three characters. These sequences are not decoded during processing. A term written as <http://a.example/%66oo-bar> in TriG designates the IRI http://a.example/%66oo-bar and not IRI http://a.example/foo-bar. A term written as ex:%66oo-bar with a prefix @prefix ex: <http://a.example/> also designates the IRI http://a.example/%66oo-bar.

4.5 Grammar

The EBNF used here is defined in XML 1.0 [EBNF-NOTATION].

Notes:

  1. A blank node identifier represents the same blank node throughout the TriG document.
  2. Keywords in single quotes ( '@base', '@prefix', 'a', 'true', 'false') are case-sensitive. Keywords in double quotes ( "BASE", "PREFIX" "GRAPH" ) are case-insensitive.
  3. Escape sequences markers \u, \U and those in ECHAR are case sensitive.
  4. When tokenizing the input and choosing grammar rules, the longest match is chosen.
  5. The TriG grammar is LL(1) and LALR(1) when the rules with uppercased names are used as terminals.
  6. The entry point into the grammar is trigDoc.
  7. In signed numbers, no white space is allowed between the sign and the number.
  8. The strings '@prefix' and '@base' match the pattern for LANGTAG, though neither "prefix" nor "base" are registered language subtags. This specification does not define whether a quoted literal followed by either of these tokens (e.g., "Z"@base) is in the TriG language.
[1] trigDoc ::= (directive | block)*
[2] block ::= triplesOrGraph | wrappedGraph | triples2 | ("GRAPH" labelOrSubject wrappedGraph)
[3] triplesOrGraph ::= (labelOrSubject (wrappedGraph | (predicateObjectList "."))) | (quotedTriple predicateObjectList ".")
[4] triples2 ::= (blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList? ".") | (collection predicateObjectList ".")
[5] wrappedGraph ::= "{" triplesBlock? "}"
[6] triplesBlock ::= triples ("." triplesBlock?)?
[7] labelOrSubject ::= iri | BlankNode
[8] directive ::= prefixID | base | sparqlPrefix | sparqlBase
[9] prefixID ::= "@prefix" PNAME_NS IRIREF "."
[10] base ::= "@base" IRIREF "."
[11] sparqlPrefix ::= "PREFIX" PNAME_NS IRIREF
[12] sparqlBase ::= "BASE" IRIREF
[13] triples ::= (subject predicateObjectList) | (blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList?)
[14] predicateObjectList ::= verb objectList (";" (verb objectList)?)*
[15] objectList ::= object annotation? ("," object annotation?)*
[16] verb ::= predicate | "a"
[17] subject ::= iri | BlankNode | collection | quotedTriple
[18] predicate ::= iri
[19] object ::= iri | BlankNode | collection | blankNodePropertyList | literal | quotedTriple
[20] literal ::= RDFLiteral | NumericLiteral | BooleanLiteral
[21] blankNodePropertyList ::= "[" predicateObjectList "]"
[22] collection ::= "(" object* ")"
[23] NumericLiteral ::= INTEGER | DECIMAL | DOUBLE
[24] RDFLiteral ::= String (LANGTAG | ("^^" iri))?
[25] BooleanLiteral ::= "true" | "false"
[26] String ::= STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_SINGLE_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_LONG_SINGLE_QUOTE | STRING_LITERAL_LONG_QUOTE
[27] iri ::= IRIREF | PrefixedName
[28] PrefixedName ::= PNAME_LN | PNAME_NS
[29] BlankNode ::= BLANK_NODE_LABEL | ANON
[30] quotedTriple ::= "<<" qtSubject predicate qtObject ">>"
[31] qtSubject ::= iri | BlankNode | quotedTriple
[32] qtObject ::= iri | BlankNode | literal | quotedTriple
[33] annotation ::= "{|" predicateObjectList "|}"

Productions for terminals
[35] IRIREF ::= "<" ([^#x00-#x20<>"{}|^`\] | UCHAR)* ">"
[36] PNAME_NS ::= PN_PREFIX? ":"
[37] PNAME_LN ::= PNAME_NS PN_LOCAL
[38] BLANK_NODE_LABEL ::= "_:" (PN_CHARS_U | [0-9]) ((PN_CHARS | ".")* PN_CHARS)?
[39] LANGTAG ::= "@" [a-zA-Z]+ ("-" [a-zA-Z0-9]+)*
[40] INTEGER ::= [+-]? [0-9]+
[41] DECIMAL ::= [+-]? ([0-9]* "." [0-9]+)
[42] DOUBLE ::= [+-]? (([0-9]+ "." [0-9]* EXPONENT) | ("." [0-9]+ EXPONENT) | ([0-9]+ EXPONENT))
[43] EXPONENT ::= [eE] [+-]? [0-9]+
[44] STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE ::= '"' ([^#x22#x5C#x0A#x0D] | ECHAR | UCHAR)* '"'
[45] STRING_LITERAL_SINGLE_QUOTE ::= "'" ([^#x27#x5C#x0A#x0D] | ECHAR | UCHAR)* "'"
[46] STRING_LITERAL_LONG_SINGLE_QUOTE ::= "'''" (("'" | "''")? ([^'\] | ECHAR | UCHAR))* "'''"
[47] STRING_LITERAL_LONG_QUOTE ::= '"""' (('"' | '""')? ([^"\] | ECHAR | UCHAR))* '"""'
[48] UCHAR ::= ("\u" HEX HEX HEX HEX) | ("\U" HEX HEX HEX HEX HEX HEX HEX HEX)
[49] ECHAR ::= "\" [tbnrf\"']
[50] NIL ::= "(" WS* ")"
[51] WS ::= #x20 | #x09 | #x0D | #x0A
[52] ANON ::= "[" WS* "]"
[53] PN_CHARS_BASE ::= [A-Z]
| [a-z]
| [#xC0-#xD6]
| [#xD8-#xF6]
| [#xF8-#x02FF]
| [#x0370-#x037D]
| [#x037F-#x1FFF]
| [#x200C-#x200D]
| [#x2070-#x218F]
| [#x2C00-#x2FEF]
| [#x3001-#xD7FF]
| [#xF900-#xFDCF]
| [#xFDF0-#xFFFD]
| [#x00010000-#x000EFFFF]
[54] PN_CHARS_U ::= PN_CHARS_BASE | "_"
[55] PN_CHARS ::= PN_CHARS_U | "-" | [0-9] | #xB7 | [#x0300-#x036F] | [#x203F-#x2040]
[56] PN_PREFIX ::= PN_CHARS_BASE ((PN_CHARS | ".")* PN_CHARS)?
[57] PN_LOCAL ::= (PN_CHARS_U | ":" | [0-9] | PLX) ((PN_CHARS | "." | ":" | PLX)* (PN_CHARS | ":" | PLX))?
[58] PLX ::= PERCENT | PN_LOCAL_ESC
[59] PERCENT ::= "%" HEX HEX
[60] HEX ::= [0-9] | [A-F] | [a-f]
[61] PN_LOCAL_ESC ::= "\" ("_" | "~" | "." | "-" | "!" | "$" | "&" | "'" | "(" | ")" | "*" | "+" | "," | ";" | "=" | "/" | "?" | "#" | "@" | "%")

5. Parsing

The RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax [RDF12-CONCEPTS] specification defines four types of RDF Term: IRIs, literals, blank nodes, and quoted triples. Literals are composed of a lexical form and an optional language tag [BCP47] or datatype IRI. An extra type, prefix, is used during parsing to map string identifiers to namespace IRIs. This section maps a string conforming to the grammar in 4.5 Grammar to a set of triples by mapping strings matching productions and lexical tokens to RDF terms or their components (e.g., language tags, lexical forms of literals). Grammar productions change the parser state and emit triples.

5.1 Parser State

Parsing TriG requires a state of seven items:

Additionally, curSubject can be bound to any RDF_Term (including a quoted triple).

5.2 RDF Term Constructors

This table maps productions and lexical tokens to RDF terms or components of RDF terms listed in 5. Parsing:

production type procedure
IRIREF IRI The characters between "<" and ">" are taken, with the numeric escape sequences unescaped, to form the unicode string of the IRI. Relative IRI reference resolution is performed per 4.3 IRI References.
PNAME_NS prefix When used in a prefixID or sparqlPrefix production, the prefix is the potentially empty unicode string matching the first argument of the rule is a key into the namespaces map.
IRI When used in a PrefixedName production, the iri is the value in the namespaces map corresponding to the first argument of the rule.
PNAME_LN IRI A potentially empty prefix is identified by the first sequence, PNAME_NS. The namespaces map MUST have a corresponding namespace. The unicode string of the IRI is formed by unescaping the reserved characters in the second argument, PN_LOCAL, and concatenating this onto the namespace.
STRING_LITERAL_SINGLE_QUOTE lexical formThe characters between the outermost "'"s are taken, with numeric and string escape sequences unescaped, to form the unicode string of a lexical form.
STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE lexical formThe characters between the outermost '"'s are taken, with numeric and string escape sequences unescaped, to form the unicode string of a lexical form.
STRING_LITERAL_LONG_SINGLE_QUOTElexical formThe characters between the outermost "'''"s are taken, with numeric and string escape sequences unescaped, to form the unicode string of a lexical form.
STRING_LITERAL_LONG_QUOTE lexical formThe characters between the outermost '"""'s are taken, with numeric and string escape sequences unescaped, to form the unicode string of a lexical form.
LANGTAG language tagThe characters following the @ form the unicode string of the language tag.
RDFLiteral literal The literal has a lexical form of the first rule argument, String, and either a language tag of LANGTAG or a datatype IRI of iri, depending on which rule matched the input. If the LANGTAG rule matched, the datatype is rdf:langString and the language tag is LANGTAG. If neither a language tag nor a datatype IRI is provided, the literal has a datatype of xsd:string.
INTEGER literal The literal has a lexical form of the input string, and a datatype of xsd:integer.
DECIMAL literal The literal has a lexical form of the input string, and a datatype of xsd:decimal.
DOUBLE literal The literal has a lexical form of the input string, and a datatype of xsd:double.
BooleanLiteral literal The literal has a lexical form of the true or false, depending on which matched the input, and a datatype of xsd:boolean.
BLANK_NODE_LABEL blank node The string matching the second argument, PN_LOCAL, is a key in bnodeLabels. If there is no corresponding blank node in the map, one is allocated.
ANON blank node A blank node is generated.
blankNodePropertyList blank node A blank node is generated. Note the rules for blankNodePropertyList in the next section.
collection blank node For non-empty lists, a blank node is generated. Note the rules for collection in the next section.
IRI For empty lists, the resulting IRI is rdf:nil. Note the rules for collection in the next section.
quotedTriple quoted triple The quoted triple is composed of the terms constructed from the subject, predicate, and object productions.

5.3 RDF Triples Construction

A TriG document defines an RDF Dataset composed of one default graph and zero or more named graphs. Each graph is composed of a set of RDF triples.

5.3.1 Output Graph

The state curGraph is initially unset. It records the label of the graph for triples produced during parsing. If undefined, the default graph is used.

The rule labelOrSubject sets both curGraph and curSubject (only one of these will be used).

The following grammar production clauses set curGraph to be undefined, indicating the default graph:

  • The grammar production clause wrappedGraph in rule block.
  • The grammar production in rule triples2.

The grammar production labelOrSubject predicateObjectList '.' unsets curGraph before handling predicateObjectLists in rule triplesOrGraph.

Beginning the quotedTriple production records the curSubject and curPredicate. Finishing the quotedTriple production yields the RDF triple curSubject curPredicate curObject and restores the recorded values of curSubject and curPredicate.

Beginning the annotation production records the curSubject and curPredicate, and sets the curSubject to the RDF triple curSubject curPredicate curObject. Finishing the annotation production

5.3.2 Triple Output

Each RDF triple produced is added to curGraph, or the default graph if curGraph is not set at that point in the parsing process.

The subject production sets the curSubject. The verb production sets the curPredicate.

Triples are produced at the following points in the parsing process and each RDF triple produced is added to the graph identified by curGraph.

5.3.3 Triple Production

Each object N in the document produces an RDF triple: curSubject curPredicate N.

5.3.4 Property Lists

Beginning the blankNodePropertyList production records the curSubject and curPredicate, and sets curSubject to a novel blank node B. Finishing the blankNodePropertyList production restores curSubject and curPredicate. The node produced by matching blankNodePropertyList is the blank node B.

5.3.5 Collections

Beginning the collection production records the curSubject and curPredicate. Each object in the collection production has a curSubject set to a novel blank node B and a curPredicate set to rdf:first. For each object objectn after the first produces a triple:objectn-1 rdf:rest objectn . Finishing the collection production creates an additional triple curSubject rdf:rest rdf:nil . and restores curSubject and curPredicate The node produced by matching collection is the first blank node B for non-empty lists and rdf:nil for empty lists.

A. Privacy Considerations

This section is non-normative.

Editor's note

TODO

B. Security Considerations

This section is non-normative.

The STRING_LITERAL_SINGLE_QUOTE, STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE, STRING_LITERAL_LONG_SINGLE_QUOTE, and STRING_LITERAL_LONG_QUOTE, productions allows the use of unescaped control characters. Although this specification does not directly expose this content to an end user, it might be presented through a user agent, which may cause the presented text to be obfuscated due to presentation of such characters.

TriG is a general-purpose assertion language; applications may evaluate given data to infer more assertions or to dereference IRIs, invoking the security considerations of the scheme for that IRI. Note in particular, the privacy issues in [RFC3023] section 10 for HTTP IRIs. Data obtained from an inaccurate or malicious data source may lead to inaccurate or misleading conclusions, as well as the dereferencing of unintended IRIs. Care must be taken to align the trust in consulted resources with the sensitivity of the intended use of the data; inferences of potential medical treatments would likely require different trust than inferences for trip planning.

The TriG language is used to express arbitrary application data; security considerations will vary by domain of use. Security tools and protocols applicable to text (for example, PGP encryption, checksum validation, password-protected compression) may also be used on TriG documents. Security/privacy protocols must be imposed which reflect the sensitivity of the embedded information.

TriG can express data which is presented to the user, such as RDF Schema labels. Applications rendering strings retrieved from untrusted TriG documents, or using unescaped characters, SHOULD use warnings and other appropriate means to limit the possibility that malignant strings might be used to mislead the reader. The security considerations in the media type registration for XML ([RFC3023] section 10) provide additional guidance around the expression of arbitrary data and markup.

TriG uses IRIs as term identifiers. Applications interpreting data expressed in TriG SHOULD address the security issues of Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987] Section 8, as well as Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax [RFC3986] Section 7.

Multiple IRIs may have the same appearance. Characters in different scripts may look similar (for instance, a Cyrillic "о" may appear similar to a Latin "o"). A character followed by combining characters may have the same visual representation as another character (for example, LATIN SMALL LETTER "E" followed by COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT has the same visual representation as LATIN SMALL LETTER "E" WITH ACUTE). Any person or application that is writing or interpreting data in TriG must take care to use the IRI that matches the intended semantics, and avoid IRIs that may look similar. Further information about matching visually similar characters can be found in Unicode Security Considerations [UNICODE-SECURITY] and Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987] Section 8.

C. Media Type Registration

Contact:
Eric Prud'hommeaux
See also:
How to Register a Media Type for a W3C Specification
Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use
TAG Finding 3 June 2002 (Revised 4 September 2002)

The Internet Media Type (formerly known as MIME Type) for TriG is "application/trig".

It is recommended that TriG files have the extension ".trig" (all lowercase) on all platforms.

It is recommended that TriG files stored on Macintosh HFS file systems be given a file type of "TEXT".

This information that follows will be submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration with IANA.

Type name:
application
Subtype name:
trig
Required parameters:
None
Optional parameters:
None
Encoding considerations:
The syntax of TriG is expressed over code points in Unicode [UNICODE]. The encoding is always UTF-8 [UTF-8].
Unicode code points may also be expressed using an \uXXXX (U+0000 to U+FFFF) or \UXXXXXXXX syntax (for U+10000 onwards) where X is a hexadecimal digit [0-9A-Fa-f]
Security considerations:
See B. Security Considerations.
Interoperability considerations:
There are no known interoperability issues.
Published specification:
This specification.
Applications which use this media type:
No widely deployed applications are known to use this media type. It may be used by some web services and clients consuming their data.
Additional information:
Magic number(s):
TriG documents may have the strings 'prefix' or 'base' (case independent) near the beginning of the document.
File extension(s):
".trig"
Base URI:
The TriG base directive can change the current base URI for relative IRI references in the language that are used sequentially later in the document.
Macintosh file type code(s):
"TEXT"
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Intended usage:
COMMON
Restrictions on usage:
None
Author/Change controller:
The TriG specification is the product of the RDF WG. The W3C reserves change control over this specifications.

D. Acknowledgments

This section is non-normative.

D.1 Acknowledgments for RDF 1.1

This section is non-normative.

The editors gratefully acknowledge the work of Chris Bizer and Richard Cyganiak in creating the original TriG specification. Valuable contributions to this version were made by Gregg Kellogg, Eric Prud'hommeaux and Sandro Hawke.

The document was improved through the review process by the wider community.

D.2 Acknowledgments for RDF 1.2

This section is non-normative.

In addition to the editors, the following people have contributed to this specification: Pierre-Antoine Champin

Members of the RDF-star Working Group Group included Achille Zappa, Adrian Gschwend, Andy Seaborne, Antoine Zimmermann, Dan Brickley, David Chaves-Fraga, Dominik Tomaszuk, Dörthe Arndt, Enrico Franconi, Fabien Gandon, Gregg Kellogg, Gregory Williams, Jesse Wright, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo, Julián Arenas-Guerrero, Olaf Hartig, Ora Lassila, Pasquale Lisena, Peter Patel-Schneider, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Raphaël Troncy, Ruben Taelman, Rémi Ceres, Souripriya Das, Stuart Sutton, Ted Thibodeau, Thomas Pellissier Tanon, Timothée Haudebourg, and Vladimir Alexiev.

Editor's note

Recognize members of the Task Force? Not an easy to find list of contributors.

E. Changes between RDF 1.1 and RDF 1.2

This section is non-normative.

This section describes the main differences from the RDF 1.1 Recommendation.

F. Index

F.1 Terms defined by this specification

F.2 Terms defined by reference

G. References

G.1 Normative references

[BCP47]
Tags for Identifying Languages. A. Phillips, Ed.; M. Davis, Ed.. IETF. September 2009. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5646
[EBNF-NOTATION]
EBNF Notation. Tim Bray; Jean Paoli; Michael Sperberg-McQueen; Eve Maler; François Yergeau et al. W3C. W3C Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-notation
[RDF12-CONCEPTS]
RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Olaf Hartig; Pierre-Antoine Champin; Gregg Kellogg. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/
[RDF12-TURTLE]
RDF 1.2 Turtle. Gregg Kellogg; Dominik Tomaszuk. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-turtle/
[RFC2119]
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. S. Bradner. IETF. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119
[RFC3986]
Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. T. Berners-Lee; R. Fielding; L. Masinter. IETF. January 2005. Internet Standard. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986
[RFC3987]
Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs). M. Duerst; M. Suignard. IETF. January 2005. Proposed Standard. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3987
[RFC8174]
Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words. B. Leiba. IETF. May 2017. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174
[UNICODE]
The Unicode Standard. Unicode Consortium. URL: https://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/
[UTF-8]
UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646. F. Yergeau. IETF. November 2003. Internet Standard. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3629

G.2 Informative references

[LANG-SUBTAG-REGISTRY]
Language Subtag Registry. IANA. URL: http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry
[RDF12-N-QUADS]
RDF 1.2 N-Quads. Gregg Kellogg; Dominik Tomaszuk. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-n-quads/
[RDF12-N-TRIPLES]
RDF 1.2 N-Triples. Gregg Kellogg; Dominik Tomaszuk. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-n-triples/
[RDF12-NEW]
What’s New in RDF 1.2. David Wood. W3C. DNOTE. URL: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-new/spec/
[RDF12-PRIMER]
RDF 1.2 Primer. Guus Schreiber; Yves Raimond. W3C. DNOTE. URL: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-primer/spec/
[RDF12-SCHEMA]
RDF 1.2 Schema. Dominik Tomaszuk; Timothée Haudebourg. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-schema/
[RDF12-SEMANTICS]
RDF 1.2 Semantics. Peter Patel-Schneider; Dörthe Arndt; Timothée Haudebourg. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-semantics/
[RDF12-XML]
RDF 1.2 XML Syntax. Gregg Kellogg. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-xml/
[RFC3023]
XML Media Types. M. Murata; S. St. Laurent; D. Kohn. IETF. January 2001. Proposed Standard. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3023
[SPARQL12-CONCEPTS]
SPARQL 1.2 Concepts. The W3C RDF-star Working Group. W3C. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://w3c.github.io/sparql-concepts/spec/
[SPARQL12-ENTAILMENT]
SPARQL 1.2 Entailment Regimes. Peter Patel-Schneider. W3C. 15 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-entailment/
[SPARQL12-FEDERATED-QUERY]
SPARQL 1.2 Federated Query. Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-federated-query/
[SPARQL12-GRAPH-STORE-PROTOCOL]
SPARQL 1.2 Graph Store Protocol. Andy Seaborne; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-graph-store-protocol/
[SPARQL12-NEW]
What’s New in SPARQL 1.2. The W3C RDF-star Working Group. W3C. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://w3c.github.io/sparql-new/spec/
[SPARQL12-PROTOCOL]
SPARQL 1.2 Protocol. Andy Seaborne; Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-protocol/
[SPARQL12-QUERY]
SPARQL 1.2 Query Language. Olaf Hartig; Andy Seaborne; Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/
[SPARQL12-RESULTS-CSV-TSV]
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats. Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-results-csv-tsv/
[SPARQL12-RESULTS-JSON]
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results JSON Format. Andy Seaborne; Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-results-json/
[SPARQL12-RESULTS-XML]
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results XML Format. Ruben Taelman; Dominik Tomaszuk; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-results-xml/
[SPARQL12-SERVICE-DESCRIPTION]
SPARQL 1.2 Service Description. Ruben Taelman; Gregory Williams. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-service-description/
[SPARQL12-UPDATE]
SPARQL 1.2 Update. Ruben Taelman; Andy Seaborne; Thomas Pellissier Tanon. W3C. 16 June 2023. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-update/
[UNICODE-SECURITY]
Unicode Security Considerations. Mark Davis; Michel Suignard. Unicode Consortium. 19 September 2014. Unicode Technical Report #36. URL: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/tr36-15.html