Copyright © 2022 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang). W3C liability, trademark and permissive document license rules apply.
This specification defines common infrastructure that other specifications can use to interact with browser permissions that allow or deny access to powerful features on the web platform. For developers, the specification defines an API to query the permission state of a powerful feature, or be notified if a permission for a powerful feature changes state.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at https://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is a work in progress.
This document was published by the Web Application Security Working Group as a Working Draft using the Recommendation track.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by W3C and its Members.
This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
This document was produced by a group operating under the 1 August 2017 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
This document is governed by the 2 November 2021 W3C Process Document.
This section is non-normative.
This example uses the Permissions API to decide whether local news should be shown using the Geolocation API or with a button offering to add the feature.
const { state } = await navigator.permissions.query({
name: "geolocation"
});
switch (state) {
case "granted":
showLocalNewsWithGeolocation();
break;
case "prompt":
showButtonToEnableLocalNews();
break;
case "denied":
showNationalNews();
break;
}
This example simultaneously checks the state of the "geolocation"
and "notifications"
powerful features:
const queryPromises = ["geolocation", "notifications"].map(
name => navigator.permissions.query({ name })
);
for await (const status of queryPromises) {
console.log(`${status.name}: ${status.state}`);
}
This example is checking the permission state of the available cameras.
const devices = await navigator.mediaDevices.enumerateDevices();
// filter on video inputs, and map to query object
const queries = devices
.filter(({ kind }) => kind === "videoinput")
.map(({ deviceId }) => ({ name: "camera", deviceId }));
const promises = queries.map((queryObj) =>
navigator.permissions.query(queryObj)
);
try {
const results = await Promise.all(promises);
// log the state of each camera
results.forEach(({ state }, i) => console.log("Camera", i, state));
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
}
This section specifies a model for permissions to use powerful features on the Web platform.
A permission represents a user's decision as to whether a web application can use a powerful feature. The decision is represented as a permission state.
Express permission refers to the user granting the web application the ability to use a powerful feature.
Conceptually, a permission for a powerful feature can be in one of the following states:
To ascertain new information about the user's intent, a user agent MAY collect information about a user's intentions. This information can come from explicit user action, aggregate behavior of both the relevant user and other users, or implicit signals this specification hasn't anticipated.
Every permission has a lifetime, which is the duration for which a particular permission remains granted before it reverts back to its default state. A lifetime could be until a particular Realm is destroyed, until a particular top-level browsing context is destroyed, an amount of time, or infinite. The lifetime is negotiated between the end-user and the user agent when the user gives express permission to use a feature — usually via some permission UI or user-agent defined policy.
Every permission has a default state (usually prompt), which is the state that the permission is in when the user has not yet given express permission to use the feature or it has been reset because its lifetime has expired.
A powerful feature is a web platform feature (usually an API) for which a user gives express permission before the feature can be used. Access to the feature is determined by the user having granted permission, or by satisfying some criteria that is equivalent to a permission grant.
A powerful feature is identified by its name, which is a string literal (e.g., "geolocation").
The user agent is responsible for tracking what powerful features each realm has the user's permission to use via the environment settings object.
Each powerful feature can define zero or more additional aspects. An aspect is defined as WebIDL dictionary that
inherits from PermissionDescriptor
and serves as an WebIDL
interface's permission descriptor type.
When a specification specifies a powerful feature it:
PermissionDescriptor
.
Registering the newly specified powerful features in the Registry of Powerful Features gives this Working Group an opportunity to provide feedback and check that integration with this specification is done effectively.
PermissionDescriptor
or one of its subtypes. If unspecified, this defaults to
PermissionDescriptor
.
The feature can define a partial order on descriptor
instances. If descriptorA is stronger than descriptorB, then if descriptorA's
permission state is "granted
", descriptorB's permission
state must also be "granted
", and if descriptorB's
permission state is "denied
", descriptorA's permission
state must also be "denied
".
{name: "midi", sysex: true}
("midi-with-sysex") is
stronger than {name: "midi", sysex: false}
("midi-without-sysex"), so if the user denies access to midi-without-sysex, the UA must
also deny access to midi-with-sysex, and similarly if the user grants access to
midi-with-sysex, the UA must also grant access to midi-without-sysex.
Some powerful features have more information associated with them than just a
PermissionState
. For example, getUserMedia
()
needs to determine
which cameras the user has granted the current realm record
permission to access. Each of these features defines an extra permission data type. If a DOMString
name names one of these features, then
name's extra permission
data for an optional environment settings object settings is the result
of the following algorithm:
If specified, the extra permission data algorithm is usable for this feature.
PermissionStatus
or one of its subtypes. If unspecified, this defaults to
PermissionStatus
.
Takes an instance of the permission descriptor type and a new or
existing instance of the permission result type, and updates the
permission result type instance with the query result. Used by
Permissions
' query
(permissionDesc)
method and the
PermissionStatus
update steps. If unspecified, this defaults to the default
permission query algorithm.
The default permission query algorithm, given a PermissionDescriptor
permissionDesc and a PermissionStatus
status, runs the following
steps:
status.state
to permissionDesc's permission state.
Takes no arguments. Updates any other parts of the implementation that need to be kept in sync with changes in the results of permission states or extra permission data, and then react to the user revoking permission.
If unspecified, this defaults to running react to the user revoking permission.
Specifications that define one or more powerful features SHOULD suggest a permission lifetime that is best suited for the particular feature. Some guidance on determining the lifetime of a permission is noted below, with a strong emphasis on user privacy. If no lifetime is specified, the user agent provides one.
When the permission lifetime expires for an origin:
An PermissionState
value that serves as a permission's default state of a powerful feature.
If not specified, the permission's default state is
"prompt
".
A default powerful feature is a powerful feature with all of the above types and algorithms defaulted.
To get the current
permission state, given a name name and an optional
environment settings object settings. This algorithm returns one of the
PermissionState
enum values:
PermissionDescriptor
whose name
is initialized with name.
A descriptor's permission state for an
optional environment settings object settings is the result of the following
algorithm. It returns a PermissionState
enum value:
denied
".
name
.
Document
run the following step:
Document
.
denied
".
PermissionState
enum value that presents permission state of
feature, taking into account any permission state constraints for
descriptor's name
.
Safari is the only known UA that returns different results from this algorithm for different settings objects with the same origin. We should test which of the several possible settings objects it uses.
As a shorthand, a DOMString
name's permission state is the permission
state of a PermissionDescriptor
with its name
member set
to name.
To request permission to use a descriptor, the UA must perform the
following steps. This algorithm returns either "granted
" or
"denied
".
prompt
", return current
state and abort these steps.
granted
"; otherwise return "denied
". The user's
interaction may provide new information about the user's intent for this realm and other realms with the same origin.
This is intentionally vague about the details of the permission UI and how the UA infers user intent. UAs should be able to explore lots of UI within this framework.
As a shorthand, requesting permission to use a DOMString
name, is the same
as requesting permission to use a PermissionDescriptor
with its
name
member set to name.
To prompt the user to choose one of several options associated with a
descriptor, the UA must perform the following steps. This algorithm returns either
"denied
" or one of the options.
denied
", return
"denied
" and abort these steps.
granted
", the UA
may return one of options and abort these steps. If the UA returns without prompting,
then subsequent prompts for the user to choose
from the same set of options with the same descriptor must return the same option,
unless the UA receives new information about the user's intent.
denied
". If the user's interaction indicates they intend this choice
to apply to other realms, then treat this this as new information about the user's
intent for other realms with the same origin.
This is intentionally vague about the details of the permission UI and how the UA infers user intent. UAs should be able to explore lots of UI within this framework.
As a shorthand, prompting the user to choose from options associated with a
DOMString
name, is the same as prompting the user to choose from those
options associated with a PermissionDescriptor
with its name
member set to name.
When the UA learns that the user no longer intends to grant permission for a realm to use a feature, react to the user revoking permission by:
WebIDL[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface Permissions
{
Promise<PermissionStatus
> query
(object permissionDesc);
};
dictionary PermissionDescriptor
{
required DOMString name
;
};
When the query()
method is invoked, the user agent MUST run the
following query a permission algorithm, passing the parameter
permissionDesc:
name
member is not supported, return
a promise rejected with a TypeError
.
PermissionDescriptor
.
name
's permission descriptor type.
PermissionStatus
with typedDescriptor.
[[query]]
internal slot.
name
's permission query algorithm, passing query and status.
WebIDL[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface PermissionStatus
: EventTarget {
readonly attribute PermissionState
state
;
readonly attribute DOMString name
;
attribute EventHandler onchange
;
};
enum PermissionState
{
"granted
",
"denied
",
"prompt
",
};
PermissionStatus
instances are created with a [[query]] internal slot,
which is an instance of a feature's permission descriptor type.
The "granted
", "denied
", and "prompt
" enum values
represent the concepts of granted, denied, and
prompt respectively.
To create a PermissionStatus
for a given
PermissionDescriptor
permissionDesc:
name
.
The name
attribute returns the value it was initialized to.
The state
attribute returns the latest value that was set on the current
instance.
The onchange
attribute is an event handler whose corresponding
event handler event type is change
.
Whenever the user agent is aware that the state of a PermissionStatus
instance
status has changed, it asynchronously runs the PermissionStatus
update
steps:
[[query]]
internal slot.
name
's permission query algorithm, passing query and status.
change
at status.
A PermissionStatus
object MUST NOT be garbage collected if it has an event listener whose type is change
.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words MAY, MUST, MUST NOT, and SHOULD in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
This section is non-normative.
Although technically this specification and the Permissions Policy specification deal with "permissions", each specification serves a distinct purpose in the platform. Nevertheless, the two specifications do explicitly overlap.
On the one hand, this specification exclusively concerns itself with powerful features whose access is managed through a user-agent mediated permissions UI (i.e., permissions where the user gives express consent before that feature can be used, and where the user retains the ability to deny that permission at any time for any reason). These powerful features are registered in the Registry of Powerful Features.
On the other hand, the Permissions Policy specification allows developers to
selectively enable and disable powerful features through a "permissions policy" (be it a HTTP header or a the allow
attribute). The APIs and features
in scope for the Permissions Policy specification go beyond those identified in the
Registry of Powerful Features (e.g., "sync-xhr" and "gamepad"). In that sense, the
Permissions Policy subsumes this specification in that Permissions Policy governs
whether a feature is available at all, independently of this specification.
A powerful feature that has been disabled by the Permissions Policy specification always has its permission state reflected as "denied" by this specification. This occurs because reading the current permission relies on [HTML]'s "allowed to use" check, which itself calls into the Permissions Policy specification. Important to note here is the sharing of permission names across both specifications. Both this specification and the Permissions Policy specification rely on other specifications defining the names of the permission and name, and they are usually named the same thing (e.g., "geolocation" of the Geolocation API, and so on).
Finally, it's not possible for a powerful feature to ever become "granted" through any means provided by the Permissions Policy specification. The only way that a powerful feature can be granted is by the user giving express permission or by some user agent policy.
This section is non-normative.
Automated testing of this specification is performed using the API provided by the Permissions Automation document.
An adversary could use a permission state as an element in creating a "fingerprint" corresponding to an end-user. Although an adversary can already determine the state of a permission by actually using the API, that often leads to a UI prompt being presented to the end-user (if the permission was not already granted). Even though this API doesn't expose new fingerprinting information to websites, it makes it easier for an adversary to have discreet access to this information.
A user agent SHOULD provide a means for the user to review, update, and reset the permission state of powerful features associated with a realm or origin.
There are no documented security considerations at this time. Readers are instead encouraged to read section C. Privacy considerations.
WebIDL[Exposed=(Window)]
partial interface Navigator {
[SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions
;
};
[Exposed=(Worker)]
partial interface WorkerNavigator {
[SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions
;
};
[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface Permissions
{
Promise<PermissionStatus
> query
(object permissionDesc);
};
dictionary PermissionDescriptor
{
required DOMString name
;
};
[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface PermissionStatus
: EventTarget {
readonly attribute PermissionState
state
;
readonly attribute DOMString name
;
attribute EventHandler onchange
;
};
enum PermissionState
{
"granted
",
"denied
",
"prompt
",
};
This section is non-normative.
The editors would like to thank Adrienne Porter Felt, Anne van Kesteren, Domenic Denicola, Jake Archibald and Wendy Seltzer for their help with the API design and editorial work.
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in:
Referenced in: