Copyright © 2010-2018 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, Beihang). W3C liability, trademark and permissive document license rules apply.
JSON is a useful data serialization and messaging format. This specification defines JSON-LD, a JSON-based format to serialize Linked Data. The syntax is designed to easily integrate into deployed systems that already use JSON, and provides a smooth upgrade path from JSON to JSON-LD. It is primarily intended to be a way to use Linked Data in Web-based programming environments, to build interoperable Web services, and to store Linked Data in JSON-based storage engines.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at https://www.w3.org/TR/.
This document has been developed by the JSON-LD Working Group and was derived from the JSON-LD Community Group's Final Report.
There is a live JSON-LD playground that is capable of demonstrating the features described in this document.
This document was published by the JSON-LD Working Group as a Working Draft. This document is intended to become a W3C Recommendation.
GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion of this specification. Alternatively, you can send comments to our mailing list. Please send them to public-json-ld-wg@w3.org (archives).
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
This document is governed by the 1 February 2018 W3C Process Document.
This document is one of three JSON-LD 1.1 Recommendations produced by the JSON-LD Working Group:
This section is non-normative.
Linked Data [LINKED-DATA] is a way to create a network of standards-based machine interpretable data across different documents and Web sites. It allows an application to start at one piece of Linked Data, and follow embedded links to other pieces of Linked Data that are hosted on different sites across the Web.
JSON-LD is a lightweight syntax to serialize Linked Data in JSON [RFC8259]. Its design allows existing JSON to be interpreted as Linked Data with minimal changes. JSON-LD is primarily intended to be a way to use Linked Data in Web-based programming environments, to build interoperable Web services, and to store Linked Data in JSON-based storage engines. Since JSON-LD is 100% compatible with JSON, the large number of JSON parsers and libraries available today can be reused. In addition to all the features JSON provides, JSON-LD introduces:
JSON-LD is designed to be usable directly as JSON, with no knowledge of RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. It is also designed to be usable as RDF, if desired, for use with other Linked Data technologies like SPARQL. Developers who require any of the facilities listed above or need to serialize an RDF Graph or Dataset in a JSON-based syntax will find JSON-LD of interest. People intending to use JSON-LD with RDF tools will find it can be used as another RDF syntax, as with [Turtle] and [TriG]. Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in section 10. Relationship to RDF.
The syntax is designed to not disturb already deployed systems running on JSON, but provide a smooth upgrade path from JSON to JSON-LD. Since the shape of such data varies wildly, JSON-LD features mechanisms to reshape documents into a deterministic structure which simplifies their processing.
This section is non-normative.
This document is a detailed specification for a serialization of Linked Data in JSON. The document is primarily intended for the following audiences:
A companion document, the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API], specifies how to work with JSON-LD at a higher level by providing a standard library interface for common JSON-LD operations.
To understand the basics in this specification you must first be familiar with JSON, which is detailed in [RFC8259].
This document almost exclusively uses the term IRI (Internationalized Resource Indicator) when discussing hyperlinks. Many Web developers are more familiar with the URL (Uniform Resource Locator) terminology. The document also uses, albeit rarely, the URI (Uniform Resource Indicator) terminology. While these terms are often used interchangeably among technical communities, they do have important distinctions from one another and the specification goes to great lengths to try and use the proper terminology at all times.
This section is non-normative.
There are a number of ways that one may participate in the development of this specification:
This section is non-normative.
The following typographic conventions are used in this specification:
markup
markup definition reference
markup external definition reference
Notes are in light green boxes with a green left border and with a "Note" header in green. Notes are always informative.
This document uses the following terms as defined in JSON [RFC8259]. Refer to the JSON Grammar section in [RFC8259] for formal definitions.
@context
where the value,
or the @id
of the value, is null
,
explicitly decouples a term's association with an IRI.
A dictionary member in the body of a JSON-LD document
whose value is null
has the same meaning as if the dictionary member was not defined.
If @value
, @list
, or @set
is set to null
in expanded form,
then the entire JSON object is ignored.Furthermore, the following terminology is used throughout this document:
_:
._:
.@language
key
whose value MUST be a string representing a [BCP47] language code or null
.@graph
member,
and MAY also have @id
, and @index
members.
A simple graph object
is a graph object which does not have an @id
member.
Note that node objects may have a @graph
member,
but are not considered graph objects if they include any other members.
A top-level object consisting of @graph
is also not a graph object.@container
set to @id
,
whose keys are interpreted as IRIs representing
the @id
of the associated node object;
value MUST be a node object.
If the value contains a key expanding to @id
,
it's value MUST be equivalent to the referencing key.@container
is set to @graph
.@container
set to @index
,
whose values MUST be any of the following types:
string,
number,
true,
false,
null,
node object,
value object,
list object,
set object, or
an array of zero or more of the above possibilities.
@container
set to @language
,
whose keys MUST be strings representing [BCP47] language codes
and the values MUST be any of the following types:
null,
string, or
an array of zero or more of the above possibilities.
@list
key.@context
keyword.@value
, @list
, or @set
keywords, or@graph
and @context
.@version
member in a context,
or via explicit API option,
other processing modes can be accessed.
This specification defines extensions for the json-ld-1.1
processing mode.@type
,
and values of terms defined to be vocabulary relative
are resolved relative to the vocabulary mapping,
not the base IRI.@set
member.@container
set to @type
,
whose keys are interpreted as IRIs
representing the @type
of the associated node object;
the value MUST be a node object, or array of node objects.
If the value contains a term expanding to @type
,
it's values are merged with the map value when expanding.@value
member.@vocab
key
whose value MUST be an absolute IRI or null
.This section is non-normative.
JSON-LD satisfies the following design goals:
@context
and @id
) to use the basic functionality in JSON-LD.This section is non-normative.
Generally speaking, the data model described by a JSON-LD document is a labeled, directed graph. The graph contains nodes, which are connected by edges. A node is typically data such as a string, number, typed values (like dates and times) or an IRI.
Within a directed graph, nodes with may be unnamed, i.e., not identified by an IRI or representing data such as strings or numbers. Such nodes are called blank nodes, and may be identified using a blank node identifier. These identifiers may be required to represent a fully connected graph using a tree structure, such as JSON, but otherwise have no intrinsic meaning.
This simple data model is incredibly flexible and powerful, capable of modeling almost any kind of data. For a deeper explanation of the data model, see section 8. Data Model.
Developers who are familiar with Linked Data technologies will recognize the data model as the RDF Data Model. To dive deeper into how JSON-LD and RDF are related, see section 10. Relationship to RDF.
At the surface level, a JSON-LD document is simply JSON, detailed in [RFC8259]. For the purpose of describing the core data structures, this is limited to arrays, dictionaries (the parsed version of a JSON Object), strings, numbers, booleans, and null, called the JSON-LD internal representation. This allows surface syntaxes other than JSON to be manipulated using the same algorithms, when the syntax maps to equivalent core data structures.
Although not discussed in this specification, parallel work using YAML [YAML] and binary representations such as CBOR [RFC7049] could be used to map into the internal representation, allowing the JSON-LD 1.1 API [JSON-LD11-API] to operate as if the source was a JSON document.
JSON-LD specifies a number of syntax tokens and keywords that are a core part of the language:
:
@base
@container
@context
@context
keyword is described in detail in
section 3.1 The Context.@graph
@id
@index
@language
@list
@nest
@none
@prefix
@reverse
@set
@type
@type
to define a type for both
node objects and value objects addresses the basic need to type data,
be it a literal value or a more complicated resource.
Experts may find the overloaded use of the @type
keyword for both purposes concerning,
but should note that Web developer usage of this feature over multiple years
has not resulted in its misuse due to the far less frequent use of @type
to express typed literal values.
@value
@version
json-ld-1.1
.
@vocab
@type
with a common prefix
IRI. This keyword is described in section 4.1.2 Default Vocabulary.All keys, keywords, and values in JSON-LD are case-sensitive.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words MAY, MUST, MUST NOT, RECOMMENDED, SHOULD, and SHOULD NOT are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Conformance criteria are relevant to authors and authoring tool implementers. As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
A JSON-LD document complies with this specification if it follows the normative statements in appendix 9. JSON-LD Grammar. JSON documents can be interpreted as JSON-LD by following the normative statements in section 6. Interpreting JSON as JSON-LD. For convenience, normative statements for documents are often phrased as statements on the properties of the document.
This specification makes use of the following namespace prefixes:
Prefix | IRI |
---|---|
dc | http://purl.org/dc/terms/ |
cred | https://w3id.org/credentials# |
foaf | http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ |
geojson | https://purl.org/geojson/vocab# |
prov | http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# |
rdf | http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# |
schema | http://schema.org/ |
skos | http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# |
xsd | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# |
These are used within this document as part of a compact IRI
as a shorthand for the resulting absolute IRI, such as dc:title
used to represent http://purl.org/dc/terms/title
.
This section is non-normative.
JSON [RFC8259] is a lightweight, language-independent data interchange format. It is easy to parse and easy to generate. However, it is difficult to integrate JSON from different sources as the data may contain keys that conflict with other data sources. Furthermore, JSON has no built-in support for hyperlinks, which are a fundamental building block on the Web. Let's start by looking at an example that we will be using for the rest of this section:
{
"name": "Manu Sporny",
"homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org/",
"image": "http://manu.sporny.org/images/manu.png"
}
It's obvious to humans that the data is about a person whose
name
is "Manu Sporny"
and that the homepage
property contains the URL of that person's homepage.
A machine doesn't have such an intuitive understanding and sometimes,
even for humans, it is difficult to resolve ambiguities in such representations. This problem
can be solved by using unambiguous identifiers to denote the different concepts instead of
tokens such as "name", "homepage", etc.
Linked Data, and the Web in general, uses IRIs
(Internationalized Resource Identifiers as described in [RFC3987]) for unambiguous
identification. The idea is to use IRIs
to assign unambiguous identifiers to data that may be of use to other developers.
It is useful for terms,
like name
and homepage
, to expand to IRIs
so that developers don't accidentally step on each other's terms. Furthermore, developers and
machines are able to use this IRI (by using a web browser, for instance) to go to
the term and get a definition of what the term means. This process is known as IRI
dereferencing.
Leveraging the popular schema.org vocabulary, the example above could be unambiguously expressed as follows:
In the example above, every property is unambiguously identified by an IRI and all values
representing IRIs are explicitly marked as such by the
@id
keyword. While this is a valid JSON-LD
document that is very specific about its data, the document is also overly verbose and difficult
to work with for human developers. To address this issue, JSON-LD introduces the notion
of a context as described in the next section.
This section only covers the most basic features of JSON-LD. More advanced features, including typed values, indexed values, and named graphs, can be found in section 4. Advanced Concepts.
This section is non-normative.
When two people communicate with one another, the conversation takes place in a shared environment, typically called "the context of the conversation". This shared context allows the individuals to use shortcut terms, like the first name of a mutual friend, to communicate more quickly but without losing accuracy. A context in JSON-LD works in the same way. It allows two applications to use shortcut terms to communicate with one another more efficiently, but without losing accuracy.
Simply speaking, a context is used to map terms to IRIs. Terms are case sensitive and any valid string that is not a reserved JSON-LD keyword can be used as a term.
For the sample document in the previous section, a context would look something like this:
{ "@context": { "name": "http://schema.org/name", ← This means that 'name' is shorthand for 'http://schema.org/name' "image": { "@id": "http://schema.org/image", ← This means that 'image' is shorthand for 'http://schema.org/image' "@type": "@id" ← This means that a string value associated with 'image' should be interpreted as an identifier that is an IRI }, "homepage": { "@id": "http://schema.org/url", ← This means that 'homepage' is shorthand for 'http://schema.org/url' "@type": "@id" ← This means that a string value associated with 'homepage' should be interpreted as an identifier that is an IRI } } }
As the context above shows, the value of a term definition can either be a simple string, mapping the term to an IRI, or a dictionary.
When a when a member with a term key has a dictionary value, the dictionary is called
an expanded term definition. The example above specifies that
the values of image
and homepage
, if they are
strings, are to be interpreted as
IRIs. Expanded term definitions
also allow terms to be used for index maps
and to specify whether array values are to be
interpreted as sets or lists.
Expanded term definitions may
be defined using absolute or
compact IRIs as keys, which is
mainly used to associate type or language information with an
absolute or compact IRI.
Contexts can either be directly embedded
into the document or be referenced. Assuming the context document in the previous
example can be retrieved at https://json-ld.org/contexts/person.jsonld
,
it can be referenced by adding a single line and allows a JSON-LD document to
be expressed much more concisely as shown in the example below:
The referenced context not only specifies how the terms map to
IRIs in the Schema.org vocabulary but also
specifies that string values associated with
the homepage
and image
property
can be interpreted as an IRI ("@type": "@id"
,
see section 3.2 IRIs for more details). This information allows developers
to re-use each other's data without having to agree to how their data will interoperate
on a site-by-site basis. External JSON-LD context documents may contain extra
information located outside of the @context
key, such as
documentation about the terms declared in the
document. Information contained outside of the @context
value
is ignored when the document is used as an external JSON-LD context document.
JSON documents can be interpreted as JSON-LD without having to be modified by referencing a context via an HTTP Link Header as described in section 6. Interpreting JSON as JSON-LD. It is also possible to apply a custom context using the JSON-LD 1.1 API [JSON-LD11-API].
In JSON-LD documents, contexts may also be specified inline. This has the advantage that documents can be processed even in the absence of a connection to the Web. Ultimately, this is a modeling decision and different use cases may require different handling.
This section only covers the most basic features of the JSON-LD Context. The Context can also be used to help interpret other more complex JSON data structures, such as indexed values, ordered values, and nested properties. More advanced features related to the JSON-LD Context are covered in section section 4. Advanced Concepts.
This section is non-normative.
IRIs (Internationalized Resource Identifiers [RFC3987]) are fundamental to Linked Data as that is how most nodes and properties are identified. In JSON-LD, IRIs may be represented as an absolute IRI or a relative IRI. An absolute IRI is defined in [RFC3987] as containing a scheme along with path and optional query and fragment segments. A relative IRI is an IRI that is relative to some other absolute IRI. In JSON-LD, with exceptions are as described below, all relative IRIs are resolved relative to the base IRI.
Properties, values of @type
,
and values of properties with a term definition
that defines them as being relative to the vocabulary mapping,
may have the form of a relative IRI, but are resolved using the
vocabulary mapping, and not the base IRI.
A string is interpreted as an IRI when it is the
value of an dictionary member with the key@id
:
{ ... "homepage": { "@id": "http://example.com/" } ... }
Values that are interpreted as IRIs, can also be
expressed as relative IRIs. For example,
assuming that the following document is located at
http://example.com/about/
, the relative IRI
../
would expand to http://example.com/
(for more
information on where relative IRIs can be
used, please refer to section 9. JSON-LD Grammar).
{ ... "homepage": { "@id": "../" } ... }
Absolute IRIs can be expressed directly in the key position like so:
{ ... "http://schema.org/name": "Manu Sporny", ... }
In the example above, the key http://schema.org/name
is interpreted as an absolute IRI.
Term-to-IRI expansion occurs if the key matches a term defined within the active context:
JSON keys that do not expand to an IRI, such as status
in the example above, are not Linked Data and thus ignored when processed.
If type coercion rules are specified in the @context
for
a particular term or property IRI, an IRI is generated:
In the example above, since the value http://manu.sporny.org/
is expressed as a JSON string, the type coercion
rules will transform the value into an IRI when processing the data.
See section 4.2.2 Type Coercion for more
details about this feature.
In summary, IRIs can be expressed in a variety of different ways in JSON-LD:
@id
or @type
.@type
key that is
set to a value of @id
or @vocab
.This section only covers the most basic features associated with IRIs in JSON-LD. More advanced features related to IRIs are covered in section 4. Advanced Concepts.
This section is non-normative.
To be able to externally reference nodes in a graph, it is important that nodes have an identifier. IRIs are a fundamental concept of Linked Data, for nodes to be truly linked, dereferencing the identifier should result in a representation of that node. This may allow an application to retrieve further information about a node.
In JSON-LD, a node is identified using the @id
keyword:
The example above contains a node object identified by the IRI
http://me.markus-lanthaler.com/
.
This section only covers the most basic features associated with node identifiers in JSON-LD. More advanced features related to node identifiers are covered in section 4. Advanced Concepts.
As a syntax, JSON has only a limited number of syntactic elements:
true
and false
, which describe literal boolean values,Null
, which describes the absense of a value,The JSON-LD data model allows for a richer set of resources, based on the RDF data model. The data model is described more fully in section 8. Data Model. JSON-LD uses JSON objects to describe various resources, along with the relationships between these resources:
@index
.
See section 4.6.1 Data Indexing for more information,
and section 9.7 Index Maps for the normative definition.
@id
.
See section 4.6.3 Node Identifier Indexing for more information,
and section 9.8 Id Maps for the normative definition.
@type
.
See section 4.6.4 Node Type Indexing for more information,
and section 9.9 Type Maps for the normative definition.
This section is non-normative.
In Linked Data, it is common to specify the type of a graph node;
in many cases, this can be inferred based on the properties used within a
given node object, or the property for which a node is a value. For
example, in the schema.org vocabulary, the givenName
property is associated with a Person. Therefore, one may reason that
if a node object contains the property firstName, that the
type is a Person; making this explicit with @type
helps
to clarify the association.
The type of a particular node can be specified using the @type
keyword. In Linked Data, types are uniquely
identified with an IRI.
A node can be assigned more than one type by using an array:
The value of a @type
key may also be a term defined in the active context:
In addition to setting the type of nodes,
@type
can also be used to set the type of a value
to create a typed value.
This use of @type
is similar to that used to define the type of a node object,
but value objects are restricted to having just a single type.
The use of @type to create typed values is discussed more fully in section 4.2.1 Typed Values.
Typed values can also be defined implicitly, by specifying @type in an expanded term definition. This is covered more fully in section 4.2.2 Type Coercion.
The ability coerce a value using a term definition is distinct from setting one or more types on a node object, as the former does not result in new data being added to the graph, while the later manages node types through adding additional relationships to the graph.
JSON-LD has a number of features that provide functionality above and beyond the core functionality described above. JSON can be used to express data using such structures, and the features described in this section can be used to interpret a variety of different JSON structures as Linked Data. A JSON-LD processor will make use of provided and embedded contexts to interpret property values in a number of different idiomatic ways.
One pattern in JSON is for the value of a property to be a string. Often times, this string actually represents some other typed value, for example an IRI, a date, or a string in some specific language. See section 4.2 Describing Values for details on how to describe such value typing.
In JSON, a property with an array value implies an implicit order; arrays in JSON-LD do not provide an ordering of the contained elements by default, unless defined using embedded structures or through a context definition. See section 4.3 Value Ordering for a further discussion.
Another JSON idiom often found in APIs is to use an intermediate object to represent the properties of an object; in JSON-LD these are refered to as nested properties and are described in section 4.4 Nested Properties.
Linked Data is all about describing the relationships between different resources. Sometimes these relationships are between resources defined in different documents described on the web, sometimes the resources are described within the same document.
In this case, a document residing at http://manu.sporny.org/about
may contain the example above, and reference another document at
http://greggkellogg.net/foaf
which could include a similar
representation.
A common idiom found in JSON usage is objects being specified as the value of other objects, called object embedding in JSON-LD; for example, a friend specified as an object value of a Person:
See section 4.5 Embedding details these relationships.
Another common idiom in JSON is to use an intermediate object to represent property values via indexing. JSON-LD allows data to be indexed in a number of different ways, as detailed in section 4.6 Indexed Values.
JSON-LD serializes directed graphs. That means that every property points from a node to another node or value. However, in some cases, it is desirable to serialize in the reverse direction, as detailed in section 4.7 Reverse Properties.
The following sections describe such advanced functionality in more detail.
This section is non-normative.
Section 3.1 The Context introduced the basics of what makes JSON-LD work. This section expands on the basic principles of the context and demonstrates how more advanced use cases can be achieved using JSON-LD.
In general, contexts may be used any time a dictionary is defined. The only time that one cannot express a context is as a direct child of another context definition (other than as part of an expanded term definition). For example, a JSON-LD document may use more than one context at different points in a document:
Duplicate context terms are overridden using a most-recently-defined-wins mechanism.
In the example above, the name
term is overridden
in the more deeply nested details
structure. Note that this is
rarely a good authoring practice and is typically used when working with
legacy applications that depend on a specific structure of the
dictionary. If a term is redefined within a
context, all previous rules associated with the previous definition are
removed. If a term is redefined to null
,
the term is effectively removed from the list of
terms defined in the active context.
Multiple contexts may be combined using an array, which is processed
in order. The set of contexts defined within a specific dictionary are
referred to as local contexts. The
active context refers to the accumulation of
local contexts that are in scope at a
specific point within the document. Setting a local context
to null
effectively resets the active context
to an empty context, without term definitions, default language,
or other things defined within previous contexts.
The following example specifies an external context
and then layers an embedded context on top of the external context:
When possible, the context definition should be put at the top of a JSON-LD document. This makes the document easier to read and might make streaming parsers more efficient. Documents that do not have the context at the top are still conformant JSON-LD.
To avoid forward-compatibility issues, terms
starting with an @
character are to be avoided as they
might be used as keyword in future versions
of JSON-LD. Terms starting with an @
character that are not
JSON-LD 1.1 keywords are treated as any other term, i.e.,
they are ignored unless mapped to an IRI. Furthermore, the use of
empty terms (""
) is not allowed as
not all programming languages are able to handle empty JSON keys.
This section is non-normative.
New features defined in JSON-LD 1.1 are available
when the processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
.
This may be set using the @version
member in a context
set to the value 1.1
as a number, or through an API option.
{ "@context": { "@version": 1.1, ... }, ... }
The first context
encountered when processing a
document which contains @version
determines the processing mode
,
unless it is defined explicitly through an API option.
Setting the processing mode explicitly for JSON-LD 1.1 is necessary so that a JSON-LD 1.0 processor does not attempt to process a JSON-LD 1.1 document and silently produce different results.
This section is non-normative.
At times, all properties and types may come from the same vocabulary. JSON-LD's
@vocab
keyword allows an author to set a common prefix which
is used as the vocabulary mapping and is used
for all properties and types that do not match a term and are neither
a compact IRI nor an absolute IRI (i.e., they do
not contain a colon).
If @vocab
is used but certain keys in an
dictionary should not be expanded using
the vocabulary IRI, a term can be explicitly set
to null in the context. For instance, in the
example below the databaseId
member would not expand to an
IRI causing the property to be dropped when expanding.
In some cases, vocabulary terms are defined directly within the document
itself, rather than in an external vocabulary. Since
json-ld-1.1
, the vocabulary mapping in the active
context can be set to the empty string ""
, which causes terms which
are expanded relative to the vocabulary, such as the keys of node
objects, to use the base IRI to create absolute
IRIs.
{ "@context": { "@version": 1.1, "@base": "http://example/document", "@vocab": "" }, "@id": "http://example.org/places#BrewEats", "@type": "#Restaurant", "#name": "Brew Eats" ... }
If this document were located at http://example/document
, it would expand as follows:
This section is non-normative.
JSON-LD allows IRIs
to be specified in a relative form which is
resolved against the document base according
section 5.1 Establishing a Base URI
of [RFC3986]. The base IRI may be explicitly set with a context
using the @base
keyword.
For example, if a JSON-LD document was retrieved from http://example.com/document.jsonld
,
relative IRIs would resolve against that IRI:
{
"@context": {
"label": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label"
},
"@id": "",
"label": "Just a simple document"
}
This document uses an empty @id
, which resolves to the document base.
However, if the document is moved to a different location, the IRI would change.
To prevent this without having to use an absolute IRI, a context
may define an @base
mapping, to overwrite the base IRI for the document.
Setting @base
to null will prevent
relative IRIs from being expanded to
absolute IRIs.
Please note that the @base
will be ignored if used in
external contexts.
This section is non-normative.
A compact IRI is a way of expressing an IRI
using a prefix and suffix separated by a colon (:
).
The prefix is a term taken from the
active context and is a short string identifying a
particular IRI in a JSON-LD document. For example, the
prefix foaf
may be used as a short hand for the
Friend-of-a-Friend vocabulary, which is identified using the IRI
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
. A developer may append
any of the FOAF vocabulary terms to the end of the prefix to specify a short-hand
version of the absolute IRI for the vocabulary term. For example,
foaf:name
would be expanded to the IRI
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
.
In the example above, foaf:name
expands to the IRI
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
and foaf:Person
expands
to http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
.
Prefixes are expanded when the form of the value
is a compact IRI represented as a prefix:suffix
combination, the prefix matches a term defined within the
active context, and the suffix does not begin with two
slashes (//
). The compact IRI is expanded by
concatenating the IRI mapped to the prefix to the (possibly empty)
suffix. If the prefix is not defined in the active context,
or the suffix begins with two slashes (such as in http://example.com
),
the value is interpreted as absolute IRI instead. If the prefix is an
underscore (_
), the value is interpreted as blank node identifier
instead.
It's also possible to use compact IRIs within the context as shown in the following example:
In JSON-LD 1.0, terms may be chosen as compact IRI prefixes when
compacting only if a simple term definition is used where the value ends with a
URI gen-delim character (e.g, /
,
#
and others, see [RFC3986]).
The previous specification allows any term to be chosen as
a compact IRI prefix, which led to a poor experience.
In JSON-LD 1.1, terms may be chosen as compact IRI prefixes
when compacting only if
a simple term definition is used where the value ends with a URI gen-delim character,
or if their expanded term definition contains
a @prefix
member with the value true.
This represents a small change to the 1.0 algorithm to prevent IRIs that are not really intended to be used as prefixes from being used for creating compact IRIs.
When processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
, terms will be used as compact IRI prefixes
when compacting only if their expanded term definition contains
a @prefix
member with the value true, or if it has a
a simple term definition where the value ends with a URI gen-delim character
(e.g, /
, #
and others, see [RFC3986]).
In this case, the compact-iris term would not normally be usable as a prefix, both
because it is defined with an expanded term definition, and because
it's @id
does not end in a
gen-delim character. Adding
"@prefix": true
allows it to be used as the prefix portion of
the compact IRI compact-iris:are-considered.
This section is non-normative.
Each of the JSON-LD keywords,
except for @context
, may be aliased to application-specific
keywords. This feature allows legacy JSON content to be utilized
by JSON-LD by re-using JSON keys that already exist in legacy documents.
This feature also allows developers to design domain-specific implementations
using only the JSON-LD context.
In the example above, the @id
and @type
keywords have been given the aliases
url and a, respectively.
Other than for @type
, properties of
expanded term definitions where the term is a keyword are be ignored.
When processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
,
@type
may be used with an expanded term definition with @container
set
to @set
; no other members may be set within such an expanded term definition.
This is used by the Compaction algorithm to ensure that the values of @type (or an alias)
are always represented in an array.
{
"@context": {
"@version": 1.1,
"@type": {"@container": "@set"}
},
"@type": ["http:/example.org/type"]
}
Since keywords cannot be redefined, they can also not be aliased to other keywords.
Aliased keywords MUST NOT be used within a context, itself.
This section is non-normative.
In general, normal IRI expansion rules apply
anywhere an IRI is expected (see section 3.2 IRIs). Within
a context definition, this can mean that terms defined
within the context may also be used within that context as long as
there are no circular dependencies. For example, it is common to use
the xsd
namespace when defining typed values:
{ "@context": { "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#", "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "age": { "@id": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age", "@type": "xsd:integer" }, "homepage": { "@id": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage", "@type": "@id" } }, ... }
In this example, the xsd
term is defined
and used as a prefix for the @type
coercion
of the age
property.
Terms may also be used when defining the IRI of another term:
{ "@context": { "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/", "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#", "name": "foaf:name", "age": { "@id": "foaf:age", "@type": "xsd:integer" }, "homepage": { "@id": "foaf:homepage", "@type": "@id" } }, ... }
Compact IRIs and IRIs may be used on the left-hand side of a term definition.
{ "@context": { "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/", "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#", "name": "foaf:name", "foaf:age": { "@type": "xsd:integer" }, "foaf:homepage": { "@type": "@id" } }, ... }
In this example, the compact IRI form is used in two different
ways.
In the first approach, foaf:age
declares both the
IRI for the term (using short-form) as well as the
@type
associated with the term. In the second
approach, only the @type
associated with the term is
specified. The full IRI for
foaf:homepage
is determined by looking up the foaf
prefix in the
context.
Absolute IRIs may also be used in the key position in a context:
{ "@context": { "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/", "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#", "name": "foaf:name", "foaf:age": { "@id": "foaf:age", "@type": "xsd:integer" }, "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage": { "@type": "@id" } }, ... }
In order for the absolute IRI to match above, the absolute IRI
needs to be used in the JSON-LD document. Also note that foaf:homepage
will not use the { "@type": "@id" }
declaration because
foaf:homepage
is not the same as http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage
.
That is, terms are looked up in a context using
direct string comparison before the prefix lookup mechanism is applied.
While it is possible to define a compact IRI, or
an absolute IRI to expand to some other unrelated IRI
(for example, foaf:name
expanding to
http://example.org/unrelated#species
), such usage is strongly
discouraged.
The only exception for using terms in the context is that circular definitions are not allowed. That is, a definition of term1 cannot depend on the definition of term2 if term2 also depends on term1. For example, the following context definition is illegal:
{ "@context": { "term1": "term2:foo", "term2": "term1:bar" }, ... }
This section is non-normative.
An expanded term definition can include a @context
property, which defines a context (an embedded context) for
values of properties defined using that term. This allows
values to use term definitions, base IRI,
vocabulary mapping or default language which is different from the
node object they are contained in, as if the
context was specified within the value itself.
In this case, the social profile is defined using the schema.org vocabulary, but interest is imported from FOAF, and is used to define a node describing one of Manu's interests where those properties now come from the FOAF vocabulary.
Expanding this document, uses a combination of terms defined in the outer context, and those defined specifically for that term in an embedded context.
Scoping can also be performed using a term used as a value of @type
:
Scoping on @type
is useful when common properties are used to
relate things of different types, where the vocabularies in use within
different entities calls for different context scoping. For example,
hasPart
/partOf
may be common terms used in a document, but mean
different things depending on the context.
When expanding, each value of @type
is considered
(ordering them lexographically) where that value is also a term in
the active context having its own embedded context. If so, that
embedded context is applied to the active context. When compacting, if
a term is chosen to represent an IRI used as a value of @type
where that
term definition also has an embedded context, it is then applied to the
active context to affect further compaction.
The values of @type
are unordered, so if multiple
types are listed, the order that scoped contexts are applied is based on
lexicographical ordering.
If a term defines a scoped context, and then that term is later re-defined, the association of the context defined in the earlier expanded term definition is lost within the scope of that re-definition. This is consistent with term definitions of a term overriding previous term definitions from earlier less deeply nested definitions, as discussed in section 4.1 Advanced Context Usage.
Scoped Contexts are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
Values are leaf nodes in a graph associated with scalar values such as strings, dates, times, and other such atomic values.
This section is non-normative.
A value with an associated type, also known as a typed value, is indicated by associating a value with an IRI which indicates the value's type. Typed values may be expressed in JSON-LD in three ways:
@type
keyword when defining
a term within an @context
section.The first example uses the @type
keyword to associate a
type with a particular term in the @context
:
The modified key's value above is automatically interpreted as a
dateTime value because of the information specified in the
@context
. The example tabs show how a JSON-LD processor will interpret the data.
The second example uses the expanded form of setting the type information in the body of a JSON-LD document:
Both examples above would generate the value
2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00
with the type
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime
. Note that it is
also possible to use a term or a compact IRI to
express the value of a type.
The @type
keyword is also used to associate a type
with a node. The concept of a node type and
a value type are different.
For more on adding types to nodes, see section 3.5 Specifying the Type.
A node type specifies the type of thing that is being described, like a person, place, event, or web page. A value type specifies the data type of a particular value, such as an integer, a floating point number, or a date.
{ ... "@id": "http://example.org/posts#TripToWestVirginia", "@type": "http://schema.org/BlogPosting", ← This is a node type "http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified": { "@value": "2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00", "@type": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime" ← This is a value type } ... }
The first use of @type
associates a node type
(http://schema.org/BlogPosting
) with the node,
which is expressed using the @id
keyword.
The second use of @type
associates a value type
(http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime
) with the
value expressed using the @value
keyword. As a
general rule, when @value
and @type
are used in
the same dictionary, the @type
keyword is expressing a value type.
Otherwise, the @type
keyword is expressing a
node type. The example above expresses the following data:
This section is non-normative.
JSON-LD supports the coercion of string values to particular data types. Type coercion allows someone deploying JSON-LD to use string property values and have those values be interpreted as typed values by associating an IRI with the value in the expanded value object representation. Using type coercion, string value representation can be used without requiring the data type to be specified explicitly with each piece of data.
Type coercion is specified within an expanded term definition
using the @type
key. The value of this key expands to an IRI.
Alternatively, the keyword @id
or @vocab
may be used
as value to indicate that within the body of a JSON-LD document, a string value of a
term coerced to @id
or @vocab
is to be interpreted as an
IRI. The difference between @id
and @vocab
is how values are expanded
to absolute IRIs. @vocab
first tries to expand the value
by interpreting it as term. If no matching term is found in the
active context, it tries to expand it as compact IRI or absolute IRI
if there's a colon in the value; otherwise, it will expand the value using the
active context's vocabulary mapping, if present.
Values coerced to @id
in contrast are expanded as
compact IRI or absolute IRI if a colon is present; otherwise, they are interpreted
as relative IRI.
Terms or compact IRIs used as the value of a
@type
key may be defined within the same context. This means that one may specify a
term like xsd
and then use xsd:integer
within the same
context definition.
The example below demonstrates how a JSON-LD author can coerce values to typed values and IRIs.
It is important to note that terms are only used in expansion
for vocabulary-relative positions, such as for keys and values of dictionary members.
Values of @id
are considered to be document-relative,
and do not use term definitions for expansion. For example, consider the following:
The unexpected result is that "barney" expands to both http://example1.com/barney
and http://example2.com/barney
, depending where it is encountered.
String values interpreted as IRIs because of the associated term definition
are typically considered to be document-relative.
In some cases, it makes sense to interpret these relative to the vocabulary,
prescribed using "@type": "@vocab"
in the term definition, though this can
lead to unexpected consequences such as these.
For more on this see section 4.1.2 Default Vocabulary
A variation on the previous example using "@type": "@id"
instead
of @vocab
illustrates the behavior of interpreting "barney" relative to the document:
The triple [ ex2:fred ex1:barney, ex1:barney] .
is emitted twice,
but exists only once in an output dataset, as it is a duplicate triple.
Terms may also be defined using absolute IRIs or compact IRIs. This allows coercion rules to be applied to keys which are not represented as a simple term. For example:
In this case the @id
definition in the term definition is optional.
If it does exist, the compact IRI or IRI representing
the term will always be expanded to IRI defined by the @id
key—regardless of whether a prefix is defined or not.
Type coercion is always performed using the unexpanded value of the key. In the
example above, that means that type coercion is done looking for foaf:age
in the active context and not for the corresponding, expanded
IRI http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age
.
Keys in the context are treated as terms for the purpose of
expansion and value coercion. At times, this may result in multiple representations for the same expanded IRI.
For example, one could specify that dog
and cat
both expanded to http://example.com/vocab#animal
.
Doing this could be useful for establishing different type coercion or language specification rules. It also allows a compact IRI (or even an
absolute IRI) to be defined as something else entirely. For example, one could specify that
the term http://example.org/zoo
should expand to
http://example.org/river
, but this usage is discouraged because it would lead to a
great deal of confusion among developers attempting to understand the JSON-LD document.
This section is non-normative.
At times, it is important to annotate a string
with its language. In JSON-LD this is possible in a variety of ways.
First, it is possible to define a default language for a JSON-LD document
by setting the @language
key in the context:
The example above would associate the ja
language
code with the two strings 花澄 and 科学者.
Languages codes are defined in [BCP47]. The default language applies to all
string values that are not type coerced.
To clear the default language for a subtree, @language
can
be set to null
in a local context as follows:
{ "@context": { ... "@language": "ja" }, "name": "花澄", "details": { "@context": { "@language": null }, "occupation": "Ninja" } }
Second, it is possible to associate a language with a specific term using an expanded term definition:
{ "@context": { ... "ex": "http://example.com/vocab/", "@language": "ja", "name": { "@id": "ex:name", "@language": null }, "occupation": { "@id": "ex:occupation" }, "occupation_en": { "@id": "ex:occupation", "@language": "en" }, "occupation_cs": { "@id": "ex:occupation", "@language": "cs" } }, "name": "Yagyū Muneyoshi", "occupation": "忍者", "occupation_en": "Ninja", "occupation_cs": "Nindža", ... }
The example above would associate 忍者 with the specified default
language code ja
, Ninja with the language code
en
, and Nindža with the language code cs
.
The value of name
, Yagyū Muneyoshi wouldn't be
associated with any language code since @language
was reset to
null in the expanded term definition.
Language associations are only applied to plain strings. Typed values or values that are subject to type coercion are not language tagged.
Just as in the example above, systems often need to express the value of a property in multiple languages. Typically, such systems also try to ensure that developers have a programmatically easy way to navigate the data structures for the language-specific data. In this case, language maps may be utilized.
{ "@context": { ... "occupation": { "@id": "ex:occupation", "@container": "@language" } }, "name": "Yagyū Muneyoshi", "occupation": { "ja": "忍者", "en": "Ninja", "cs": "Nindža" } ... }
The example above expresses exactly the same information as the previous
example but consolidates all values in a single property. To access the
value in a specific language in a programming language supporting dot-notation
accessors for object properties, a developer may use the
property.language
pattern. For example, to access the occupation
in English, a developer would use the following code snippet:
obj.occupation.en
.
Third, it is possible to override the default language by using a value object:
{ "@context": { ... "@language": "ja" }, "name": "花澄", "occupation": { "@value": "Scientist", "@language": "en" } }
This makes it possible to specify a plain string by omitting the
@language
tag or setting it to null
when expressing
it using a value object:
{ "@context": { ... "@language": "ja" }, "name": { "@value": "Frank" }, "occupation": { "@value": "Ninja", "@language": "en" }, "speciality": "手裏剣" }
See section 9.6 Language Maps for a description of using language maps to set the language of mapped values.
This section is non-normative.
A JSON-LD author can express multiple values in a compact way by using arrays. Since graphs do not describe ordering for links between nodes, arrays in JSON-LD do not provide an ordering of the contained elements by default. This is exactly the opposite from regular JSON arrays, which are ordered by default. For example, consider the following simple document:
Multiple values may also be expressed using the expanded form:
The example shown above would generates statement, again with no inherent order.
Although multiple values of a property are typically of the same type, JSON-LD places no restriction on this, and a property may have values of different types:
When viewed as statements, the values have no inherent order.
This section is non-normative.
As the notion of ordered collections is rather important in data
modeling, it is useful to have specific language support. In JSON-LD,
a list may be represented using the @list
keyword as follows:
This describes the use of this array as being ordered,
and order is maintained when processing a document. If every use of a given multi-valued
property is a list, this may be abbreviated by setting @container
to @list
in the context:
The implementation of lists in RDF depends on linking anonymous nodes
together using the properties rdf:first
and
rdf:rest
, with the end of the list defined as the resource
rdf:nil
. This can be represented as statments, as the "statements"
tab illustrates.
Both JSON-LD and Turtle provide shortcuts for representing ordered lists.
In JSON-LD 1.1, lists of lists, where the value of a list object, may itself be a list object, are fully supported. For example, in GeoJSON (see [RFC7946]), coordinates are an ordered list of positions, which are represented as an array of two or more numbers:
{
"type": "Feature",
"bbox": [-10.0, -10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
"geometry": {
"type": "Polygon",
"coordinates": [
[
[-10.0, -10.0],
[10.0, -10.0],
[10.0, 10.0],
[-10.0, -10.0]
]
]
}
//...
}
For these examples, it's important that values expressed within bbox and coordinates maintain their order, which requires the use of embedded list structures. In JSON-LD 1.1, we can express this using recursive lists, by simply adding the appropriate context definion:
Note that coordinates includes three levels of lists.
Values of terms associated with an @list
container
are always represented in the form of an array,
even if there is just a single value or no value at all.
This section is non-normative.
While @list
is used to describe ordered lists,
the @set
keyword is used to describe unordered sets.
The use of @set
in the body of a JSON-LD document
is optimized away when processing the document, as it is just syntactic
sugar. However, @set
is helpful when used within the context
of a document.
Values of terms associated with an @set
container
are always represented in the form of an array,
even if there is just a single value that would otherwise be optimized to
a non-array form in compact form (see
section 5.2 Compacted Document Form). This makes post-processing of
JSON-LD documents easier as the data is always in array form, even if the
array only contains a single value.
This describes the use of this array as being unordered,
and order is maintained when processing a document. By default,
arrays of values are unordered, but this may be made explicit by
setting @container
to @set
in the context:
Since JSON-LD 1.1, the @set
keyword may be
combined with other container specifications within an expanded term
definition to similarly cause compacted values of indexes to be consistently
represented using arrays. See section 4.6 Indexed Values for a further discussion.
This section is non-normative.
Many JSON APIs separate properties from their entities using an intermediate object; in JSON-LD these are called nested properties. For example, a set of possible labels may be grouped under a common property:
By defining labels using the keyword @nest
,
a JSON-LD processor will ignore the nesting created by using the
labels property and process the contents as if it were declared
directly within containing object. In this case, the labels
property is semantically meaningless. Defining it as equivalent to
@nest
causes it to be ignored when expanding, making it
equivalent to the following:
Similarly, node objects may contain a @nest
property to
reference a term aliased to @nest
which causes such
values to be nested under that aliased term.
Nested properties are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
Embedding is a JSON-LD feature that allows an author to use node objects as property values. This is a commonly used mechanism for creating a parent-child relationship between two nodes.
Without embedding, node objects can be linked by referencing the identifier of another node object. For example:
The previous example describes two node objects, for Manu and Gregg, with
the knows
property defined to treat string values as identifiers.
Embedding allows the node object for Gregg to be embedded as a value
of the knows
property:
A node object, like the one used above, may be used in
any value position in the body of a JSON-LD document. Note that type coercion of the knows
property
is not required, as the value is not a string.
While it is considered a best practice to identify nodes in a graph,
at times this is impractical. In the data model, nodes without an explicit
identifier are called blank nodes, which can be represented in a
serialization such as JSON-LD using a blank node identifier. In the
previous example, the top-level node for Manu does not have an identifier,
and does not need one to describe it within the data model. However, if we
were to want to describe a knows relationship from Gregg to Manu,
we would need to introduce a blank node identifier
(here _:b0
).
Blank node identifiers may be automatically introduced by algorithms such as flattening, but they are also useful for authors to describe such relationships directly.
This section is non-normative.
At times, it becomes necessary to be able to express information without
being able to uniquely identify the node with an IRI.
This type of node is called a blank node. JSON-LD does not require
all nodes to be identified using @id
. However, some graph topologies
may require identifiers to be serializable. Graphs containing loops, e.g., cannot
be serialized using embedding alone, @id
must be used to connect the nodes.
In these situations, one can use blank node identifiers,
which look like IRIs using an underscore (_
)
as scheme. This allows one to reference the node locally within the document, but
makes it impossible to reference the node from an external document. The
blank node identifier is scoped to the document in which it is used.
The example above contains information about two secret agents that cannot be identified with an IRI. While expressing that agent 1 knows agent 2 is possible without using blank node identifiers, it is necessary to assign agent 1 an identifier so that it can be referenced from agent 2.
It is worth noting that blank node identifiers may be relabeled during processing. If a developer finds that they refer to the blank node more than once, they should consider naming the node using a dereferenceable IRI so that it can also be referenced from other documents.
This section is non-normative.
Sometimes multiple property values need to be accessed in a more direct fashion than iterating though multiple array values. JSON-LD provides an indexing mechanism to allow the use of an intermediate dictionary to associate specific indexes with associated values.
See section 4.8 Named Graphs for other uses of indexing in JSON-LD.
This section is non-normative.
Databases are typically used to make access to data more efficient. Developers often extend this sort of functionality into their application data to deliver similar performance gains. Often this data does not have any meaning from a Linked Data standpoint, but is still useful for an application.
JSON-LD introduces the notion of index maps
that can be used to structure data into a form that is
more efficient to access. The data indexing feature allows an author to
structure data using a simple key-value map where the keys do not map
to IRIs. This enables direct access to data
instead of having to scan an array in search of a specific item.
In JSON-LD such data can be specified by associating the
@index
keyword with a
@container
declaration in the context:
In the example above, the post term has
been marked as an index map. The en and
de keys will be ignored semantically, but preserved
syntactically, by the JSON-LD Processor. This allows a developer to
access the German version of the post using the
following code snippet: obj.post.de
.
The interpretation of the data is expressed in the statements table. Note how the index keys do not appear in the statements, but would continue to exist if the document were compacted or expanded (see section 5.2 Compacted Document Form and section 5.1 Expanded Document Form) using a JSON-LD processor.
The value of @container
can also
be an array containing both @index
and @set
.
When compacting, this ensures that a JSON-LD Processor will use
the array form for all values of indexes.
If the processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
,
the special index @none
is used for indexing
data which does not have an associated index, which is useful to maintain
a normalized representation.
This section is non-normative.
JSON which includes string values in multiple languages may be
represented using a language map to allow for easily
indexing property values by language tag. This enables direct access to
language values instead of having to scan an array in search of a specific item.
In JSON-LD such data can be specified by associating the
@language
keyword with a
@container
declaration in the context:
In the example above, the label term has
been marked as an language map. The en and
de keys are implicitly associated with their respective
values by the JSON-LD Processor. This allows a developer to
access the German version of the label using the
following code snippet: obj.label.de
.
The value of @container
can also
be an array containing both @language
and @set
.
When compacting, this ensures that a JSON-LD Processor will use
the array form for all values of language tags.
If the processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
,
the special index @none
is used for indexing
strings which do not have a language; this is useful to maintain
a normalized representation for string values not having a datatype.
This section is non-normative.
In addition to index maps, JSON-LD introduces the notion of id maps
for structuring data. The id indexing feature allows an author to
structure data using a simple key-value map where the keys map
to IRIs. This enables direct access to associated node objects
instead of having to scan an array in search of a specific item.
In JSON-LD such data can be specified by associating the
@id
keyword with a
@container
declaration in the context:
In the example above, the post
term has
been marked as an id map. The http://example.com/posts/1/en
and
http://example.com/posts/1/de
keys will be interpreted
as the @id
property of the node object value.
The interpretation of the data above is exactly the same as that in section 4.6.1 Data Indexing using a JSON-LD processor.
The value of @container
can also
be an array containing both @id
and @set
.
When compacting, this ensures that a JSON-LD processor will use
the array form for all values of node identifiers.
The special index @none
is used for indexing
node objects which do not have an @id
, which is useful to maintain
a normalized representation. The @none
index may also be
a term which expands to @none
, such as the term none
used in the example below.
Id maps are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
In addition to id and index maps, JSON-LD introduces the notion of type maps
for structuring data. The type indexing feature allows an author to
structure data using a simple key-value map where the keys map
to IRIs. This enables data to be structured based on the @type
of specific node objects.
In JSON-LD such data can be specified by associating the
@type
keyword with a
@container
declaration in the context:
In the example above, the affiliation
term has
been marked as an type map. The schema:Corporation
and
schema:ProfessionalService
keys will be interpreted
as the @type
property of the node object value.
The value of @container
can also
be an array containing both @type
and @set
.
When compacting, this ensures that a JSON-LD processor will use
the array form for all values of types.
The special index @none
is used for indexing
node objects which do not have an @type
, which is useful to maintain
a normalized representation. The @none
index may also be
a term which expands to @none
, such as the term none
used in the example below.
As with id maps, when used with @type
, a container may also
include @set
to ensure that key values are always contained in an array.
Type maps are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
JSON-LD serializes directed graphs. That means that every property points from a node to another node or value. However, in some cases, it is desirable to serialize in the reverse direction. Consider for example the case where a person and its children should be described in a document. If the used vocabulary does not provide a children property but just a parent property, every node representing a child would have to be expressed with a property pointing to the parent as in the following example.
Expressing such data is much simpler by using JSON-LD's @reverse
keyword:
The @reverse
keyword can also be used in
expanded term definitions
to create reverse properties as shown in the following example:
This section is non-normative.
At times, it is necessary to make statements about a graph
itself, rather than just a single node. This can be done by
grouping a set of nodes using the @graph
keyword. A developer may also name data expressed using the
@graph
keyword by pairing it with an
@id
keyword as shown in the following example:
The example above expresses a named graph that is identified
by the IRI http://example.org/foaf-graph
. That
graph is composed of the statements about Manu and Gregg. Metadata about
the graph itself is expressed via the generatedAt
property,
which specifies when the graph was generated.
When a JSON-LD document's top-level structure is an
dictionary that contains no other
keys than @graph
and
optionally @context
(properties that are not mapped to an
IRI or a keyword are ignored),
@graph
is considered to express the otherwise implicit
default graph. This mechanism can be useful when a number
of nodes exist at the document's top level that
share the same context, which is, e.g., the case when a
document is flattened. The
@graph
keyword collects such nodes in an array
and allows the use of a shared context.
In this case, embedding doesn't work as each node object
references the other. This is equivalent to using multiple
node objects in array and defining
the @context
within each node object:
This section is non-normative.
In some cases, it is useful to logically partition data into separate
graphs, without making this explicit within the JSON expression. For
example, a JSON document may contain data against which other metadata is
asserted and it is useful to separate this data in the data model using
the notion of named graphs, without the syntactic overhead
associated with the @graph
keyword.
An expanded term definition can use @graph
as the
value of @container
. This indicates that values of this
term should be considered to be named graphs, where the
graph name is an automatically assigned blank node identifier
creating an implicitly named graph. When expanded, these become
simple graph objects.
An alternative to our example above could use an anonymously named graph as follows:
The example above expresses a named graph that is identified
by the blank node identifier _:b0
. That
graph is composed of the statements about Manu and Gregg. Metadata about
the graph itself is expressed via the generatedAt
property,
which specifies when the graph was generated.
The blank node identifier _:b0
is automatically created to allow the default graph to reference the
named graph as the definition of the claim. These are
necessary for serialization, where nodes without explicit identifiers,
such as the named graph in this case, can be represented.
Strictly speaking, the value of such a term is not a named graph, rather it is the graph name associated with the named graph, which exists separately within the dataset.
Graph Containers are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
In addition to indexing node objects by index, graph objects may
also be indexed by an index. By using the @graph
container type, introduced in section 4.8.1 Graph Containers
in addition to @index
, an object value of such a property is
treated as a key-value map where the keys do not map to IRIs, but
are taken from an @index
property associated with named graphs
which are their values. When expanded, these must be simple graph objects
The following example describes a default graph referencing multiple named graphs using an index map.
As with index maps, when used with @graph
, a container may also
include @set
to ensure that key values are always contained in an array.
If the processing mode is set to json-ld-1.1
,
the special index @none
is used for indexing
graphs which does not have an @index
key, which is useful to maintain
a normalized representation. Note, however, that
compacting a document where multiple unidentified named graphs are
compacted using the @none
index will result in the content
of those graphs being merged. To prevent this, give each graph a distinct
@index
key.
This section is non-normative.
In addition to indexing node objects by identifier, graph objects may
also be indexed by their graph name. By using the @graph
container type, introduced in section 4.8.1 Graph Containers
in addition to @id
, an object value of such a property is
treated as a key-value map where the keys represent the identifiers of named graphs
which are their values.
The following example describes a default graph referencing multiple named graphs using an id map.
As with id maps, when used with @graph
, a container may also
include @set
to ensure that key values are always contained in an array.
As with id maps, the special index @none
is used for indexing
named graphs which do not have an @id
, which is useful to maintain
a normalized representation. The @none
index may also be
a term which expands to @none
.
Note, however, that if multiple graphs are represented without
an @id
, they will be merged on expansion. To prevent this,
use @none
judiciously, and consider giving graphs
their own distinct identifier.
Graph Containers are a new feature in JSON-LD 1.1, requiring
processing mode set to json-ld-1.1
.
This section is non-normative.
As with many data formats, there is no single correct way to describe data in JSON-LD. However, as JSON-LD is used for describing graphs, certain transformations can be used to change the shape of the data, without changing its meaning as Linked Data.
@context
is no longer necessary.
This process is described further in section 5.1 Expanded Document Form.This section is non-normative.
The JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API]
defines a method for expanding a JSON-LD document.
Expansion is the process of taking a JSON-LD document and applying a
context such that all IRIs, types, and values
are expanded so that the @context
is no longer necessary.
For example, assume the following JSON-LD input document:
{
"@context": {
"name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
"homepage": {
"@id": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage",
"@type": "@id"
}
},
"name": "Manu Sporny",
"homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org/"
}
Running the JSON-LD Expansion algorithm against the JSON-LD input document provided above would result in the following output:
JSON-LD's media type defines a
profile
parameter which can be used to signal or request
expanded document form. The profile URI identifying expanded document
form is http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#expanded
.
This section is non-normative.
The JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API] defines a method for compacting a JSON-LD document. Compaction is the process of applying a developer-supplied context to shorten IRIs to terms or compact IRIs and JSON-LD values expressed in expanded form to simple values such as strings or numbers. Often this makes it simpler to work with document as the data is expressed in application-specific terms. Compacted documents are also typically easier to read for humans.
For example, assume the following JSON-LD input document:
[
{
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": [ "Manu Sporny" ],
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage": [
{
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/"
}
]
}
]
Additionally, assume the following developer-supplied JSON-LD context:
{
"@context": {
"name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
"homepage": {
"@id": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage",
"@type": "@id"
}
}
}
Running the JSON-LD Compaction algorithm given the context supplied above against the JSON-LD input document provided above would result in the following output:
JSON-LD's media type defines a
profile
parameter which can be used to signal or request
compacted document form. The profile URI identifying compacted document
form is http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#compacted
.
This section is non-normative.
The JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API] defines a method for flattening a JSON-LD document. Flattening collects all properties of a node in a single dictionary and labels all blank nodes with blank node identifiers. This ensures a shape of the data and consequently may drastically simplify the code required to process JSON-LD in certain applications.
For example, assume the following JSON-LD input document:
{
"@context": {
"name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
"knows": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows"
},
"@id": "http://me.markus-lanthaler.com/",
"name": "Markus Lanthaler",
"knows": [
{
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu",
"name": "Manu Sporny"
}, {
"name": "Dave Longley"
}
]
}
Running the JSON-LD Flattening algorithm against the JSON-LD input document in the example above and using the same context would result in the following output:
JSON-LD's media type defines a
profile
parameter which can be used to signal or request
flattened document form. The profile URI identifying flattened document
form is http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#flattened
. It can be
combined with the profile URI identifying
expanded document form or
compacted document from.
This section is non-normative.
The JSON-LD 1.1 Framing specification [JSON-LD11-FRAMING] defines a method for framing a JSON-LD document. Framing is used to shape the data in a JSON-LD document, using an example frame document which is used to both match the flattened data and show an example of how the resulting data should be shaped.
For example, assume the following JSON-LD frame:
{
"@context": {
"@version": 1.1,
"@vocab": "http://example.org/"
},
"@type": "Library",
"contains": {
"@type": "Book",
"contains": {
"@type": "Chapter"
}
}
}
This frame document describes an embedding structure that would place objects with type Library at the top, with objects of type Book that were linked to the library object using the contains property embedded as property values. It also places objects of type Chapter within the referencing Book object as embedded values of the Book object.
When using a flattened set of objects that match the frame components:
{
"@context": {
"@vocab": "http://example.org/",
"contains": {"@type": "@id"}
},
"@graph": [{
"@id": "http://example.org/library",
"@type": "Library",
"contains": "http://example.org/library/the-republic"
}, {
"@id": "http://example.org/library/the-republic",
"@type": "Book",
"creator": "Plato",
"title": "The Republic",
"contains": "http://example.org/library/the-republic#introduction"
}, {
"@id": "http://example.org/library/the-republic#introduction",
"@type": "Chapter",
"description": "An introductory chapter on The Republic.",
"title": "The Introduction"
}]
}
The Frame Algorithm can create a new document which follows the structure of the frame:
Ordinary JSON documents can be interpreted as JSON-LD
by providing an explicit JSON-LD context document. One way
to provide this is by using referencing a JSON-LD
context document in an HTTP Link Header.
Doing so allows JSON to be unambiguously machine-readable without requiring developers to drastically
change their documents and provides an upgrade path for existing infrastructure
without breaking existing clients that rely on the application/json
media type or a media type with a +json
suffix as defined in
[RFC6839].
In order to use an external context with an ordinary JSON document, when retrieving an ordinary JSON document via HTTP, processors MUST retrieve any JSON-LD document referenced by a Link Header with:
rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context"
, andtype="application/ld+json"
.The referenced document MUST have a top-level JSON object.
The @context
member within that object is added to the top-level
JSON object of the referencing document. If an array
is at the top-level of the referencing document and its items are
JSON objects, the @context
subtree is added to all array items. All extra information located outside
of the @context
subtree in the referenced document MUST be
discarded. Effectively this means that the active context is
initialized with the referenced external context. A response MUST NOT
contain more than one HTTP Link Header [RFC8288] using the
http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context
link relation.
Other mechanisms for providing a JSON-LD Context MAY be described for other URI schemes.
The JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API] provides for an expandContext option for specifying a context to use when expanding JSON documents programatically.
The following example demonstrates the use of an external context with an ordinary JSON document over HTTP:
GET /ordinary-json-document.json HTTP/1.1 Host: example.com Accept: application/ld+json,application/json,*/*;q=0.1 ==================================== HTTP/1.1 200 OK ... Content-Type: application/json Link: <https://json-ld.org/contexts/person.jsonld>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context"; type="application/ld+json" { "name": "Markus Lanthaler", "homepage": "http://www.markus-lanthaler.com/", "image": "http://twitter.com/account/profile_image/markuslanthaler" }
Please note that JSON-LD documents
served with the application/ld+json
media type MUST have all context information, including references to external
contexts, within the body of the document. Contexts linked via a
http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context
HTTP Link Header MUST be
ignored for such documents.
JSON-LD content can be easily embedded in HTML [HTML52] by placing
it in a Script element with the type
attribute set to
application/ld+json
. Doing so creates a
data block.
Defining how such data may be used is beyond the scope of this specification. The embedded JSON-LD document might be extracted as is or, e.g., be interpreted as RDF.
If JSON-LD content is extracted as RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS], it MUST be expanded into an
RDF Dataset using the
Deserialize JSON-LD to RDF Algorithm
[JSON-LD11-API]. Unless a specific script is targeted
(see section 7.3 Locating a Specific JSON-LD Script Element),
all script elements
with type
application/ld+json
MUST be processed and merged
into a single dataset with equivalent blank node identifiers contained in
separate script elements treated as if they were in a single document (i.e.,
blank nodes are shared between different JSON-LD script elements).
base
elementWhen processing a JSON-LD script element, the Document Base URL of the containing HTML document, as defined in [HTML52], is used to establish the default base IRI of the enclosed JSON-LD content.
The use of the Document Base URL from [HTML52] for setting the base IRI of the enclosed JSON-LD is an experimental feature, which may be changed in a future version of this specification.
HTML allows for Dynamic changes to base URLs. This specification does not require any specific behavior, and to ensure that all systems process the base IRI equivalently, authors SHOULD either use absolute IRIs, or explicitly as defined in section 4.1.3 Base IRI. Implementations (particularly those natively operating in the [DOM]) MAY take into consideration Dynamic changes to base URLs.
script
elementsThis section is non-normative.
Due to the HTML Restrictions for contents of <script>
elements
additional encoding restrictions are placed on JSON-LD data contained in
script elements.
Authors should avoid using character sequences in scripts embedded in HTML which may be confused with a comment-open, script-open, comment-close, or script-close.
&
→ & (ampersand, U+0026)<
→ < (less-than sign, U+003C)>
→ > (greater-than sign, U+003E)"
→ " (quotation mark, U+0022)'
→ ' (apostrophe, U+0027)A specific script element within an HTML document may be located using a fragment identifier matching the unique identifier of the script element within the HTML document located by a URL (see [DOM]). A JSON-LD processor MUST extract only the specified data block's contents parsing it as a standalone JSON-LD document and MUST NOT merge the result with any other markup from the same HTML document.
For example, given an HTML document located at http://example.com/document
,
a script element identified by "name" can be targeted using the URL
http://example.com/document#name
.
JSON-LD is a serialization format for Linked Data based on JSON. It is therefore important to distinguish between the syntax, which is defined by JSON in [RFC8259], and the data model which is an extension of the RDF data model [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. The precise details of how JSON-LD relates to the RDF data model are given in section 10. Relationship to RDF.
To ease understanding for developers unfamiliar with the RDF model, the following summary is provided:
{
"@id": "http://example.org/1"
}
@id
.
A document may have nodes which are unrelated, as long as one or more
properties are defined, or the node is referenced from another node object.
_:
.xsd:string
), a number
(numbers with a non-zero fractional part, i.e., the result of a modulo‑1 operation,
are interpreted as typed values with type xsd:double
, all other
numbers are interpreted as typed values
with type xsd:integer
), true or false (which are interpreted as
typed values with type xsd:boolean
),
or a language-tagged string.JSON-LD documents MAY contain data that cannot be represented by the data model defined above. Unless otherwise specified, such data is ignored when a JSON-LD document is being processed. One result of this rule is that properties which are not mapped to an IRI, a blank node, or keyword will be ignored.
Additionally, the JSON serialization format is internally represented using the JSON-LD internal representation, which uses the generic concepts of arrays, dictionaries, strings, numbers, booleans, and null to describe the data represented by a JSON document.
The dataset described in this figure can be represented as follows:
Note the use of @graph
at the outer-most level to describe three top-level
resources (two of them named graphs). The named graphs use @graph
in addition
to @id
to provide the name for each graph.
This appendix restates the syntactic conventions described in the previous sections more formally.
A JSON-LD document MUST be valid JSON text as described in [RFC8259], or some format that can be represented in the JSON-LD internal representation that is equivalent to valid JSON text.
A JSON-LD document MUST be a single node object,
a dictionary consisting of only
the members @context
and/or @graph
,
or an array or zero or more node objects.
In contrast to JSON, in JSON-LD the keys in objects MUST be unique.
Whenever a keyword is discussed in this grammar, the statements also apply to an alias for that keyword.
JSON-LD allows keywords to be aliased
(see section 4.1.5 Aliasing Keywords for details). For example, if the active context
defines the term id
as an alias for @id
,
that alias may be legitimately used as a substitution for @id
.
Note that keyword aliases are not expanded during context
processing.
A term is a short-hand string that expands to an IRI or a blank node identifier.
A term MUST NOT equal any of the JSON-LD keywords.
When used as the prefix in a Compact IRI, to avoid
the potential ambiguity of a prefix being confused with an IRI
scheme, terms SHOULD NOT come from the list of URI schemes as defined in
[IANA-URI-SCHEMES]. Similarly, to avoid confusion between a
Compact IRI and a term, terms SHOULD NOT include a colon (:
)
and SHOULD be restricted to the form of
isegment-nz-nc
as defined in [RFC3987].
To avoid forward-compatibility issues, a term SHOULD NOT start
with an @
character as future versions of JSON-LD may introduce
additional keywords. Furthermore, the term MUST NOT
be an empty string (""
) as not all programming languages
are able to handle empty JSON keys.
See section 3.1 The Context and section 3.2 IRIs for further discussion on mapping terms to IRIs.
A node object represents zero or more properties of a node in the graph serialized by the JSON-LD document. A dictionary is a node object if it exists outside of a JSON-LD context and:
@graph
and @context
,@value
, @list
,
or @set
keywords, andThe properties of a node in a graph may be spread among different node objects within a document. When that happens, the keys of the different node objects need to be merged to create the properties of the resulting node.
A node object MUST be a dictionary. All keys which are not IRIs, compact IRIs, terms valid in the active context, or one of the following keywords (or alias of such a keyword) MUST be ignored when processed:
@context
,@id
,@graph
,@nest
,@type
,@reverse
, or@index
If the node object contains the @context
key, its value MUST be null, an absolute IRI,
a relative IRI, a context definition, or
an array composed of any of these.
If the node object contains the @id
key,
its value MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or a compact IRI (including
blank node identifiers).
See section 3.3 Node Identifiers,
section 4.1.4 Compact IRIs, and
section 4.5.1 Identifying Blank Nodes for further discussion on
@id
values.
If the node object contains the @graph
key, its value MUST be
a node object or
an array of zero or more node objects.
If the node object contains an @id
keyword,
its value is used as the graph name of a named graph.
See section 4.8 Named Graphs for further discussion on
@graph
values. As a special case, if a dictionary
contains no keys other than @graph
and @context
, and the
dictionary is the root of the JSON-LD document, the
dictionary is not treated as a node object; this
is used as a way of defining node objects
that may not form a connected graph. This allows a
context to be defined which is shared by all of the constituent
node objects.
If the node object contains the @type
key, its value MUST be either an absolute IRI, a
relative IRI, a compact IRI
(including blank node identifiers),
a term defined in the active context expanding into an absolute IRI, or
an array of any of these.
See section 3.5 Specifying the Type for further discussion on
@type
values.
If the node object contains the @reverse
key,
its value MUST be a dictionary containing members representing reverse
properties. Each value of such a reverse property MUST be an absolute IRI,
a relative IRI, a compact IRI, a blank node identifier,
a node object or an array containing a combination of these.
If the node object contains the @index
key,
its value MUST be a string. See
section 4.6.1 Data Indexing for further discussion
on @index
values.
If the node object contains the @nest
key,
its value MUST be an dictionary or an array of dictionaries
which MUST NOT include a value object. See
section 9.10 Property Nesting for further discussion
on @nest
values.
Keys in a node object that are not keywords MAY expand to an absolute IRI using the active context. The values associated with keys that expand to an absolute IRI MUST be one of the following:
A graph object represents a named graph, which MAY include
include an explicit graph name.
A dictionary is a graph object if
it exists outside of a JSON-LD context,
it is not a node object,
it is not the top-most dictionary in the JSON-LD document, and
it consists of no members other than @graph
,
@index
, @id
and @context
, or an alias of one of these keywords.
If the graph object contains the @context
key, its value MUST be null, an absolute IRI,
a relative IRI, a context definition, or
an array composed of any of these.
If the graph object contains the @id
key,
its value is used as the identifier (graph name) of a named graph, and
MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or a compact IRI (including
blank node identifiers).
See section 3.3 Node Identifiers,
section 4.1.4 Compact IRIs, and
section 4.5.1 Identifying Blank Nodes for further discussion on
@id
values.
A graph object without an @id
member is also a
simple graph object and represents a named graph without an
explicit identifier, although in the data model it still has a
graph name, which is an implicitly allocated
blank node identifier.
The value of the @graph
key MUST be
a node object or
an array of zero or more node objects.
See section 4.8 Named Graphs for further discussion on
@graph
values..
A value object is used to explicitly associate a type or a language with a value to create a typed value or a language-tagged string.
A value object MUST be a dictionary containing the
@value
key. It MAY also contain an @type
,
an @language
, an @index
, or an @context
key but MUST NOT contain
both an @type
and an @language
key at the same time.
A value object MUST NOT contain any other keys that expand to an
absolute IRI or keyword.
The value associated with the @value
key MUST be either a
string, a number, true,
false or null.
The value associated with the @type
key MUST be a
term, a compact IRI,
an absolute IRI, a string which can be turned
into an absolute IRI using the vocabulary mapping, or null.
The value associated with the @language
key MUST have the
lexical form described in [BCP47], or be null.
The value associated with the @index
key MUST be a
string.
See section 4.2.1 Typed Values and section 4.2.3 String Internationalization for more information on value objects.
A list represents an ordered set of values. A set
represents an unordered set of values. Unless otherwise specified,
arrays are unordered in JSON-LD. As such, the
@set
keyword, when used in the body of a JSON-LD document,
represents just syntactic sugar which is optimized away when processing the document.
However, it is very helpful when used within the context of a document. Values
of terms associated with an @set
or @list
container
will always be represented in the form of an array when a document
is processed—even if there is just a single value that would otherwise be optimized to
a non-array form in compact document form.
This simplifies post-processing of the data as the data is always in a
deterministic form.
A list object MUST be a dictionary that contains no
keys that expand to an absolute IRI or keyword other
than @list
, @context
, and @index
.
A set object MUST be a dictionary that contains no
keys that expand to an absolute IRI or keyword other
than @set
, @context
, and @index
.
Please note that the @index
key will be ignored when being processed.
In both cases, the value associated with the keys @list
and @set
MUST be one of the following types:
See section 4.3 Value Ordering for further discussion on sets and lists.
A language map is used to associate a language with a value in a
way that allows easy programmatic access. A language map may be
used as a term value within a node object if the term is defined
with @container
set to @language
,
or an array containing both @language
and @set
. The keys of a
language map MUST be strings representing
[BCP47] language codes, the keyword @none
,
or a term which expands to @none
,
and the values MUST be any of the following types:
See section 4.2.3 String Internationalization for further discussion on language maps.
An index map allows keys that have no semantic meaning,
but should be preserved regardless, to be used in JSON-LD documents.
An index map may
be used as a term value within a node object if the
term is defined with @container
set to @index
,
or an array containing both @index
and @set
.
The values of the members of an index map MUST be one
of the following types:
See section 4.6.1 Data Indexing for further information on this topic.
Index Maps may also be used to map indexes to associated
named graphs, if the term is defined with @container
set to an array containing both @graph
and
@index
, and optionally including @set
. The
value consists of the node objects contained within the named
graph which is named using the referencing key, which can be
represented as a simple graph object.
An id map is used to associate an IRI with a value that allows easy
programmatic access. An id map may be used as a term value within a node object if the term
is defined with @container
set to @id
,
or an array containing both @id
and @set
.
The keys of an id map MUST be IRIs
(relative IRI, compact IRI (including blank node identifiers), or absolute IRI),
the keyword @none
,
or a term which expands to @none
,
and the values MUST be node objects.
If the value contains a property expanding to @id
, it's value MUST
be equivalent to the referencing key. Otherwise, the property from the value is used as
the @id
of the node object value when expanding.
Id Maps may also be used to map graph names to their
named graphs, if the term is defined with @container
set to an array containing both @graph
and @id
,
and optionally including @set
. The value consists of the
node objects contained within the named graph
which is named using the referencing key.
A type map is used to associate an IRI with a value that allows easy
programmatic access. A type map may be used as a term value within a node object if the term
is defined with @container
set to @type
,
or an array containing both @type
and @set
.
The keys of a type map MUST be IRIs
(relative IRI, compact IRI (including blank node identifiers), or absolute IRI),
the keyword @none
,
or a term which expands to @none
,
and the values MUST be node objects.
If the value contains a property expanding to @type
, and it's value
is contains the referencing key after suitable expansion of both the referencing key
and the value, then the node object already contains the type. Otherwise, the property from the value is
added as a @type
of the node object value when expanding.
A nested property is used to gather properties of a node object in a separate dictionary, or array of dictionaries which are not value objects. It is semantically transparent and is removed during the process of expansion. Property nesting is recursive, and collections of nested properties may contain further nesting.
Semantically, nesting is treated as if the properties and values were declared directly within the containing node object.
A context definition defines a local context in a node object.
A context definition MUST be a dictionary whose
keys MUST be either terms, compact IRIs, absolute IRIs,
or one of the keywords @language
, @base
,
@type
, @vocab
, or @version
.
If the context definition has an @language
key,
its value MUST have the lexical form described in [BCP47] or be null.
If the context definition has an @base
key,
its value MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or null.
If the context definition has an @type
key,
its value MUST be a dictionary with the single member @container
set to @set
.
If the context definition has an @vocab
key,
its value MUST be a absolute IRI, a compact IRI,
a blank node identifier,
an empty string (""
),
a term, or null.
If the context definition has an @version
key,
its value MUST be a number with the value 1.1
.
The value of keys that are not keywords MUST be either an absolute IRI, a compact IRI, a term, a blank node identifier, a keyword, null, or an expanded term definition.
An expanded term definition is used to describe the mapping between a term and its expanded identifier, as well as other properties of the value associated with the term when it is used as key in a node object.
An expanded term definition MUST be a dictionary
composed of zero or more keys from
@id
,
@reverse
,
@type
,
@language
,
@context
,
@prefix
, or
@container
. An
expanded term definition SHOULD NOT contain any other keys.
If the term being defined is not a compact IRI or
absolute IRI and the active context does not have an
@vocab
mapping, the expanded term definition MUST
include the @id
key.
If the expanded term definition contains the @id
keyword, its value MUST be null, an absolute IRI,
a blank node identifier, a compact IRI, a term,
or a keyword.
If an expanded term definition has an @reverse
member,
it MUST NOT have @id
or @nest
members at the same time,
its value MUST be an absolute IRI,
a blank node identifier, a compact IRI, or a term. If an
@container
member exists, its value MUST be null,
@set
, or @index
.
If the expanded term definition contains the @type
keyword, its value MUST be an absolute IRI, a
compact IRI, a term, null, or one of the
keywords @id
or @vocab
.
If the expanded term definition contains the @language
keyword,
its value MUST have the lexical form described in [BCP47] or be null.
If the expanded term definition contains the @container
keyword, its value MUST be either
@list
,
@set
,
@language
,
@index
,
@id
,
@graph
,
@type
, or be
null
or an array containing exactly any one of those keywords, or a
combination of @set
and any of @index
,
@id
, @graph
, @type
,
@language
in any order
.
@container
may also be an array
containing @graph
along with either @id
or
@index
and also optionally including @set
.
If the value
is @language
, when the term is used outside of the
@context
, the associated value MUST be a language map.
If the value is @index
, when the term is used outside of
the @context
, the associated value MUST be an
index map.
If an expanded term definition has an @context
member,
it MUST be a valid context definition
.
If the expanded term definition contains the @nest
keyword, its value MUST be either @nest
, or a term
which expands to @nest
.
If the expanded term definition contains the @prefix
keyword, its value MUST be true
or false
.
Terms MUST NOT be used in a circular manner. That is, the definition of a term cannot depend on the definition of another term if that other term also depends on the first term.
See section 3.1 The Context for further discussion on contexts.
JSON-LD keywords are described in section 1.7 Syntax Tokens and Keywords, this section describes where each keyword may appear within different JSON-LD structures.
@base
@base
keyword MUST NOT be aliased, and MAY be used as a key in a context definition.
Its value MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI, or null.
@container
@container
keyword MUST NOT be aliased, and MAY be used as a key in an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be either
@list
,
@set
,
@language
,
@index
,
@id
,
@graph
,
@type
, or be
null,
or an array containing exactly any one of those keywords, or a
combination of @set
and any of @index
,
@id
, @graph
, @type
,
@language
in any order.
The value may also be an array
containing @graph
along with either @id
or
@index
and also optionally including @set
.
@context
@context
keyword MUST NOT be aliased, and MAY be used as a key in the following objects:
@context
MUST be
null,
an absolute IRI,
a relative IRI,
a context definition, or
an array composed of any of these.
@id
@id
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a node object or a graph object.
The unaliased @id
MAY be used as a key in an expanded term definition,
or as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
The value of the @id
key MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or a compact IRI (including blank node identifiers).
See section 3.3 Node Identifiers,
section 4.1.4 Compact IRIs, and
section 4.5.1 Identifying Blank Nodes for further discussion on
@id
values.
@index
@index
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a
node object, value object, graph object, set object, or list object.
The unaliased @index
MAY be used as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be a string.
See section 9.7 Index Maps for a further discussion.
@language
@language
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a value object.
The unaliased @language
MAY be used as a key in a context definition,
or as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be a string with the lexical form described in [BCP47] or be null..
See section 9.7 Index Maps for a further discussion.
@list
@list
keyword MAY be aliased and MUST be used as a key in a list object.
The unaliased @list
MAY be used as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be one of the following:
See section 4.3 Value Ordering for further discussion on sets and lists.
@nest
@nest
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a node object.
The unaliased @nest
MAY be used as the value of a simple term definition,
or as a key in an expanded term definition.
When used in a node object, its value must be a dictionary.
When used in an expanded term definition, its value MUST be a term expanding to @nest
.
Its value MUST be a string.
See section 9.10 Property Nesting for a further discussion.
@none
@none
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY beused as a key in an
index map, id map, language map, type map.
See section 4.6.1 Data Indexing,
section 4.6.2 Language Indexing,
section 4.6.3 Node Identifier Indexing,
section 4.6.4 Node Type Indexing,
section 4.8.3 Named Graph Indexing, or
section 4.8.2 Named Graph Data Indexing
for a further discussion.@prefix
@prefix
keyword MUST NOT be aliased, and MAY be used as a key in an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be true
or false
.
See section 4.1.4 Compact IRIs
and section 9.11 Context Definitions
for a further discussion.
@reverse
@reverse
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a node object.
The unaliased @reverse
MAY be used as a key in an expanded term definition.
The value of the @reverse
key MUST be an absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or a compact IRI (including blank node identifiers).
See section 4.7 Reverse Properties and
section 9.11 Context Definitions for further discussion.
@set
@set
keyword MAY be aliased and MUST be used as a key in a set object.
The unaliased @set
MAY be used as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be one of the following:
See section 4.3 Value Ordering for further discussion on sets and lists.
@type
@type
keyword MAY be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a node object or a value object.
The unaliased @type
MAY be used as a key in an expanded term definition,
or as the value of the @container
key within an expanded term definition.
The value of the @type
key MUST be a term, absolute IRI, a relative IRI,
or a compact IRI (including blank node identifiers).
Within an expanded term definition, its value may also be either @id
or @vocab
.
This keyword is described further in section 3.5 Specifying the Type
and section 4.2.1 Typed Values.
@value
@value
keyword MAY be aliased and MUST be used as a key in a value object.
Its value key MUST be either a string, a number, true, false or null.
This keyword is described further in section 9.4 Value Objects.
@version
@version
keyword MUST NOT be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a context definition.
Its value MUST be a number with the value 1.1
.
This keyword is described further in section 9.11 Context Definitions.
@vocab
@vocab
keyword MUST NOT be aliased and MAY be used as a key in a context definition
or as the value of @type
in an expanded term definition.
Its value MUST be a absolute IRI, a compact IRI, a blank node identifier, an empty string (""), a term, or null.
This keyword is described further in section 9.11 Context Definitions,
and section 4.1.2 Default Vocabulary.
JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is both an RDF document and a JSON document and correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model. However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data model to optionally allow JSON-LD to serialize generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are:
The use of blank node identifiers to label properties is obsolete, and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for generalized RDF Datasets.
Summarized, these differences mean that JSON-LD is capable of serializing any RDF graph or dataset and most, but not all, JSON-LD documents can be directly interpreted as RDF as described in RDF 1.1 Concepts [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
Authors are strongly encouraged to avoid labeling properties using blank node identifiers, instead, consider one of the following mechanisms:
urn:example:1
, see [URN], orThe normative algorithms for interpreting JSON-LD as RDF and serializing RDF as JSON-LD are specified in the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API].
Even though JSON-LD serializes RDF Datasets, it can also be used as a RDF graph source. In that case, a consumer MUST only use the default graph and ignore all named graphs. This allows servers to expose data in languages such as Turtle and JSON-LD using content negotiation.
Publishers supporting both dataset and graph syntaxes have to ensure that the primary data is stored in the default graph to enable consumers that do not support datasets to process the information.
This section is non-normative.
The process of serializing RDF as JSON-LD and deserializing JSON-LD to RDF depends on executing the algorithms defined in RDF Serialization-Deserialization Algorithms in the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API]. It is beyond the scope of this document to detail these algorithms any further, but a summary of the necessary operations is provided to illustrate the process.
The procedure to deserialize a JSON-LD document to RDF involves the following steps:
For example, consider the following JSON-LD document in compact form:
{
"@context": {
"name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
"knows": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows"
},
"@id": "http://me.markus-lanthaler.com/",
"name": "Markus Lanthaler",
"knows": [
{
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu",
"name": "Manu Sporny"
}, {
"name": "Dave Longley"
}
]
}
Running the JSON-LD Expansion and Flattening algorithms against the JSON-LD input document in the example above would result in the following output:
[
{
"@id": "_:b0",
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": "Dave Longley"
}, {
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu",
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": "Manu Sporny"
}, {
"@id": "http://me.markus-lanthaler.com/",
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": "Markus Lanthaler",
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows": [
{ "@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu" },
{ "@id": "_:b0" }
]
}
]
Deserializing this to RDF now is a straightforward process of turning each node object into one or more RDF triples. This can be expressed in Turtle as follows:
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
_:b0 foaf:name "Dave Longley" .
<http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu> foaf:name "Manu Sporny" .
<http://me.markus-lanthaler.com/> foaf:name "Markus Lanthaler" ;
foaf:knows <http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu>, _:b0 .
The process of serializing RDF as JSON-LD can be thought of as the inverse of this last step, creating an expanded JSON-LD document closely matching the triples from RDF, using a single node object for all triples having a common subject, and a single property for those triples also having a common predicate. The result may then be framed by using the Framing Algorithm described in [JSON-LD11-FRAMING] to create the desired object embedding.
This section is non-normative.
The image consists of three dashed boxes, each describing a different linked data graph. Each box consists of shapes linked with arrows describing the linked data relationships.
The first box is titled "default graph: <no name>" describes two
resources: http://example.com/people/alice
and http://example.com/people/bob
(denoting "Alice" and "Bob" respectively), which are
connected by an arrow labeled schema:knows
which describes
the knows relationship between the two resources. Additionally, the "Alice" resource is related
to three different literals:
The second and third boxes describe two named graphs, with the graph names "http://example.com/graphs/1" and "http://example.com/graphs/1", respectively.
The second box consists of two resources:
http://example.com/people/alice
and http://example.com/people/bob
related by the schema:parent
relationship, and names the
http://example.com/people/bob
"Bob".
The third box consists of two resources, one
named http://example.com/people/bob
and the other unnamed.
The two resources related to each other using schema:sibling
relationship
with the second named "Mary".
This section is non-normative.
The JSON-LD examples below demonstrate how JSON-LD can be used to express semantic data marked up in other linked data formats such as Turtle, RDFa, and Microdata. These sections are merely provided as evidence that JSON-LD is very flexible in what it can express across different Linked Data approaches.
This section is non-normative.
The following are examples of transforming RDF expressed in [Turtle] into JSON-LD.
The JSON-LD context has direct equivalents for the Turtle
@prefix
declaration:
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
<http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu> a foaf:Person;
foaf:name "Manu Sporny";
foaf:homepage <http://manu.sporny.org/> .
{
"@context": {
"foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
},
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu",
"@type": "foaf:Person",
"foaf:name": "Manu Sporny",
"foaf:homepage": { "@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/" }
}
Both [Turtle] and JSON-LD allow embedding, although [Turtle] only allows embedding of blank nodes.
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
<http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu>
a foaf:Person;
foaf:name "Manu Sporny";
foaf:knows [ a foaf:Person; foaf:name "Gregg Kellogg" ] .
{
"@context": {
"foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
},
"@id": "http://manu.sporny.org/about#manu",
"@type": "foaf:Person",
"foaf:name": "Manu Sporny",
"foaf:knows": {
"@type": "foaf:Person",
"foaf:name": "Gregg Kellogg"
}
}
In JSON-LD numbers and boolean values are native data types. While [Turtle]
has a shorthand syntax to express such values, RDF's abstract syntax requires
that numbers and boolean values are represented as typed literals. Thus,
to allow full round-tripping, the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API]
defines conversion rules between JSON-LD's native data types and RDF's
counterparts. Numbers without fractions are
converted to xsd:integer
-typed literals, numbers with fractions
to xsd:double
-typed literals and the two boolean values
true and false to a xsd:boolean
-typed
literal. All typed literals are in canonical lexical form.
{
"@context": {
"ex": "http://example.com/vocab#"
},
"@id": "http://example.com/",
"ex:numbers": [ 14, 2.78 ],
"ex:booleans": [ true, false ]
}
@prefix ex: <http://example.com/vocab#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://example.com/>
ex:numbers "14"^^xsd:integer, "2.78E0"^^xsd:double ;
ex:booleans "true"^^xsd:boolean, "false"^^xsd:boolean .
Both JSON-LD and [Turtle] can represent sequential lists of values.
@prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> .
<http://example.org/people#joebob> a foaf:Person;
foaf:name "Joe Bob";
foaf:nick ( "joe" "bob" "jaybee" ) .
{
"@context": {
"foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
},
"@id": "http://example.org/people#joebob",
"@type": "foaf:Person",
"foaf:name": "Joe Bob",
"foaf:nick": {
"@list": [ "joe", "bob", "jaybee" ]
}
}
This section is non-normative.
The following example describes three people with their respective names and homepages in RDFa [RDFA-CORE].
<div prefix="foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"> <ul> <li typeof="foaf:Person"> <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/bob/"> <span property="foaf:name">Bob</span> </a> </li> <li typeof="foaf:Person"> <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/eve/"> <span property="foaf:name">Eve</span> </a> </li> <li typeof="foaf:Person"> <a property="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/manu/"> <span property="foaf:name">Manu</span> </a> </li> </ul> </div>
An example JSON-LD implementation using a single context is described below.
This section is non-normative.
The HTML Microdata [MICRODATA] example below expresses book information as a Microdata Work item.
<dl itemscope
itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Work"
itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/works/45U8QJGZSQKDH8N">
<dt>Title</dt>
<dd><cite itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/title">Just a Geek</cite></dd>
<dt>By</dt>
<dd><span itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator">Wil Wheaton</span></dd>
<dt>Format</dt>
<dd itemprop="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization"
itemscope
itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression"
itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK">
<link itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/type" href="http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/BOOK">
Print
</dd>
<dd itemprop="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization"
itemscope
itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression"
itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK">
<link itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/type" href="http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/EBOOK">
Ebook
</dd>
</dl>
Note that the JSON-LD representation of the Microdata information stays true to the desires of the Microdata community to avoid contexts and instead refer to items by their full IRI.
[
{
"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/works/45U8QJGZSQKDH8N",
"@type": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Work",
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/title": "Just a Geek",
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator": "Wil Wheaton",
"http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization":
[
{"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK"},
{"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK"}
]
}, {
"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK",
"@type": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression",
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/type": {"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/BOOK"}
}, {
"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK",
"@type": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression",
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/type": {"@id": "http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/EBOOK"}
}
]
This section has been submitted to the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) for review, approval, and registration with IANA.
profile
A non-empty list of space-separated URIs identifying specific
constraints or conventions that apply to a JSON-LD document according to [RFC6906].
A profile does not change the semantics of the resource representation
when processed without profile knowledge, so that clients both with
and without knowledge of a profiled resource can safely use the same
representation. The profile
parameter MAY be used by
clients to express their preferences in the content negotiation process.
If the profile parameter is given, a server SHOULD return a document that
honors the profiles in the list which are recognized by the server.
It is RECOMMENDED that profile URIs are dereferenceable and provide
useful documentation at that URI. For more information and background
please refer to [RFC6906].
This specification defines three values for the profile
parameter.
To request or specify expanded JSON-LD document form,
the URI http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#expanded
SHOULD be used.
To request or specify compacted JSON-LD document form,
the URI http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#compacted
SHOULD be used.
To request or specify flattened JSON-LD document form,
the URI http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#flattened
SHOULD be used.
Please note that, according [HTTP11], the value of the profile
parameter has to be enclosed in quotes ("
) because it contains
special characters and, if multiple profiles are combined, whitespace.
When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is important to note that its value contains one or more URIs and not IRIs. In some cases it might therefore be necessary to convert between IRIs and URIs as specified in section 3 Relationship between IRIs and URIs of [RFC3987].
Since JSON-LD is intended to be a pure data exchange format for
directed graphs, the serialization SHOULD NOT be passed through a
code execution mechanism such as JavaScript's eval()
function to be parsed. An (invalid) document may contain code that,
when executed, could lead to unexpected side effects compromising
the security of a system.
When processing JSON-LD documents, links to remote contexts are typically followed automatically, resulting in the transfer of files without the explicit request of the user for each one. If remote contexts are served by third parties, it may allow them to gather usage patterns or similar information leading to privacy concerns. Specific implementations, such as the API defined in the JSON-LD 1.1 Processing Algorithms and API specification [JSON-LD11-API], may provide fine-grained mechanisms to control this behavior.
JSON-LD contexts that are loaded from the Web over non-secure connections, such as HTTP, run the risk of being altered by an attacker such that they may modify the JSON-LD active context in a way that could compromise security. It is advised that any application that depends on a remote context for mission critical purposes vet and cache the remote context before allowing the system to use it.
Given that JSON-LD allows the substitution of long IRIs with short terms, JSON-LD documents may expand considerably when processed and, in the worst case, the resulting data might consume all of the recipient's resources. Applications should treat any data with due skepticism.
Fragment identifiers used with application/ld+json are treated as in RDF syntaxes, as per RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
Consider requirements from Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy.
This section is non-normative.
The following is a list of issues open at the time of publication.
Consider using "@type": "@json"
to describe native values in the compact form.
When requesting JSON-LD from an HTTP endpoint, it would be useful to provide a reference to a context or frame which should be used by the server to put the results into the proper format.
Provide a means for refering to a remote context without without requiring it to be downloaded.
Consider a mechanism such as Microdata's @itemref
for including objects within another referencing node.
Mechinism to allow freezing terms so that additional contexts don't override them.
Should consider html>head>base@href
and xml:base
, as appropriate.
Proposal is to start from scratch, ie, deprecating @graph
and replacing the functionality with something cleaner.
"@version": [1.1, "amazingExtensionFoo", "nicheExtensionBar"]
- processors throw if they don't understand every extension listed.Consider documentation best practices.
Consider issues surrounding confusion of differing expansion rules for @id
, @type
, and dictionary members.
Node Types in @context
.
This section is non-normative.
@version
member which is used to set the processing mode.@context
property, which defines a context used for values of
a property identified with such a term.@container
values within an expanded term definition may now
include @id
, @graph
and @type
, corresponding to id maps and type maps.@nest
property, which identifies a term expanding to
@nest
which is used for containing properties using the same
@nest
mapping. When expanding, the values of a property
expanding to @nest
are treated as if they were contained
within the enclosing node object directly.@none
key, but
JSON-LD 1.0 only allowed string keys. This has been updated
to allow @none
keys.@container
in an expanded term definition
can also be an array containing any appropriate container
keyword along with @set
(other than @list
).
This allows a way to ensure that such property values will always
be expressed in array form.@prefix
member with the value true. The 1.0 algorithm has
been updated to only consider terms that map to a value that ends with a URI
gen-delim character.@container
set to @graph
are interpreted as
implicitly named graphs, where the associated graph name is
assigned from a new blank node identifier. Other combinations
include ["@container", "@id"]
, ["@container", "@index"]
each also
may include "@set"
, which create maps from the
graph identifier or index value similar to index maps
and id maps.""
) has been added as a possible value for @vocab
in
a context. When this is set, vocabulary-relative IRIs, such as the
keys of node objects, are expanded or compacted relative
to the base IRI using string concatenation.Additionally, see section G. Changes since JSON-LD Community Group Final Report.
This section is non-normative.
@type
, or an alais of @type
, may now have their @container
set to @set
to ensure that @type
members are always represented as an array. This
also allows a term to be defined for @type
, where the value MUST be a dictionary
with @container
set to @set
.This section is non-normative.
This 1.1 version of the specification is a product of deliberations by the members of the JSON-LD 1.1 Working Group chaired by Robert Sanderson and Benjamin Young along with members of the Working Group: Adam Soroka, Alejandra Gonzalez Beltran, Axel Polleres, Christopher Allen, Dan Brickley, Dave Longley, David Lehn, David Newbury, Harold Solbrig, Ivan Herman, Jeff Mixter, Leonard Rosenthol, Manu Sporny, Matthias Kovatsch, Sebastian Käbisch, Simon Steyskal, Steve Blackmon, Timothy Cole, Victor Charpenay, and Gregg Kellogg.
A large amount of thanks goes out to the JSON-LD Community Group participants who worked through many of the technical issues on the mailing list and the weekly telecons: Chris Webber, David Wood, Drummond Reed, Eleanor Joslin, Farbian Gandon, Herm Fisher, Jamie Pitts, Kim Hamilton Duffy, Niklas Lindström, Paolo Ciccarese, Paul Frazze, Paul Warren, Rego Gmür, Rob Trainer, Ted Thibodeau Jr., and Victor Charpenay.
For the 1.0 version of the specification
The authors would like to extend a deep appreciation and the most sincere thanks to Mark Birbeck, who contributed foundational concepts to JSON-LD via his work on RDFj. JSON-LD uses a number of core concepts introduced in RDFj, such as the context as a mechanism to provide an environment for interpreting JSON data. Mark had also been very involved in the work on RDFa as well. RDFj built upon that work. JSON-LD exists because of the work and ideas he started nearly a decade ago in 2004.
A large amount of thanks goes out to the JSON-LD Community Group participants who worked through many of the technical issues on the mailing list and the weekly telecons - of special mention are François Daoust, Stéphane Corlosquet, Lin Clark, and Zdenko 'Denny' Vrandečić.
The work of David I. Lehn and Mike Johnson are appreciated for reviewing, and performing several early implementations of the specification. Thanks also to Ian Davis for this work on RDF/JSON.
Thanks to the following individuals, in order of their first name, for their input on the specification: Adrian Walker, Alexandre Passant, Andy Seaborne, Ben Adida, Blaine Cook, Bradley Allen, Brian Peterson, Bryan Thompson, Conal Tuohy, Dan Brickley, Danny Ayers, Daniel Leja, Dave Reynolds, David Booth, David I. Lehn, David Wood, Dean Landolt, Ed Summers, elf Pavlik, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Erik Wilde, Fabian Christ, Jon A. Frost, Gavin Carothers, Glenn McDonald, Guus Schreiber, Henri Bergius, Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez, Ivan Herman, Jack Moffitt, Josh Mandel, KANZAKI Masahide, Kingsley Idehen, Kuno Woudt, Larry Garfield, Mark Baker, Mark MacGillivray, Marko Rodriguez, Marios Meimaris, Matt Wuerstl, Melvin Carvalho, Nathan Rixham, Olivier Grisel, Paolo Ciccarese, Pat Hayes, Patrick Logan, Paul Kuykendall, Pelle Braendgaard, Peter Patel-Schneider, Peter Williams, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Richard Cyganiak, Roy T. Fielding, Sandro Hawke, Simon Grant, Srecko Joksimovic, Stephane Fellah, Steve Harris, Ted Thibodeau Jr., Thomas Steiner, Tim Bray, Tom Morris, Tristan King, Sergio Fernández, Werner Wilms, and William Waites.